I think, in principle, we are in agreement, but I was just underscoring a fact, which gets clouded in Muslim conversations, where whilst fighting for the rights of the Palestinians, and doing all we can for their wellbeing, and return of their land, we must remember Jews are also natives to the land (I am not taking about converts).
The issue is about 60 to 70% are actually converts and this 60 to 70% are the ones who pushed for all of this an control the government there and do everything over there. This 60/70% runs the show and is who is mainly represented and started zionism. The ones pushing for this project of isreal aren't are the converts that have no ethnic ties to the land.
You mean like how today's ethnic Somalis displaced erstwhile natives to take over the land, and make it their own? After all, the land we call ours today was originally inhabited by Bantus, no?
Bantus aren't even native to the East Side of Africa at all they migrated from west Africa into the east and wiped out ethnic groups along the way. The whole them being natives is a retcon and it's the victim narrative I'm talking about. East Africa is native to nilotes, cushites and those San people who are on the verge of extinction. Somalis are a mix of the nilotes that lived in this region and natufians from between North and East Africa in Sudan and Egypt.
The fact that they believe there natives and pushing for reconquest is them feeling entitled and trying to push that only bantus are native to Africa and that we aren't because we don't look like them physically. There whole argument is based off somalis not looking like "real" Africans and many African and non Africans have fallen for it. To bad there fuuleys and can't act on it but that there sentiment.
I did not realise you were an ethnocentricst, why not, after all, you are a Northerner (kaftan)?
No that's an example of what they want to do not what they are doing. They want somalia "back" which would involved ethnically cleansing somalis just like the hutus tried to do with the tutsis. We already have seen there attempt in action aswell as there justifications when there not even natives to rawanda or like I said before anywhere along east Africa.
If it is your ancestral land, could you not just return at any time?
I don't have a problem with returning to ones ancestral land. I have a problem with trying to take over and do underhanded stuff and acting a victim and then going on to cry when you get push back. If you wanna take somewhere by force expect the blowback and Don't go off on stuff that ain't true but then again propaganda is propaganda and technically everything is fair in war.
You mean like Liberia being taken over by former slaves from the US?
Not really I was just giving an example that people have been given opportunity to go back to there ancestral lands like the AAs and that there is nothing wrong with going back to it as someone who's been removed from it for 100s of years.
The second part is about what isreal was doing in comparison because they always had accesses to going back to there ancestral lands but they wanted to take over and completely wipe out its previous inhabitants which is what they are doing to this day.
