@merka @Bahal @Gambar
Let me make it clear. I'm well aware he wants to ban Muslims for Islamic terrorism reasons. He's not banning Muslims because he hates them for their religion. He banned the 6 countries for 90 days until he comes up with the "extreme vetting". Yes, he can extend it for "security reasons". He can't ban other Muslim countries that don't have terrorism issues because he has no excuses if he truly hates Muslims. He can't ban people because of their religion as he would violate the first amendment.
He clearly is banning countries with terrorism problems. The question is, does the state support or does the country have terrorists in them. YES, so he has valid argument there.
A Muslim ban would be banning people for their religion (Islam) which he never stated that I'm aware of. If you can provide evidence for this, I will happily admit my wrong here.
I don't agree with the order, but it's invalid to say this is a Muslim ban he's not banning people for their religion, but for security reasons.
Until their is an order where he bans all Muslims or adds countries that have no terrorism, then this argument would be valid.