Atheists why don't you belive in Allah

Status
Not open for further replies.
That statement itself cannot be proven to be true empirically. Your argument is self-defeating.

The burden of proof is on the person making a positive claim as in God exist.

Furthermore belief requires a reason and lack of empirical proof or evidence to the contrary makes the belief baseless.
 

Apollo

VIP
I'm a Deist.

Basically, there probably is a God, but he is not a personal one and never contacted humanity. Het set up the laws of physics and the created the universe and through evolution created humans. Humans have free will and can create their own destiny.
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
@AussieHustler I told you @Geeljire sanbuur is a Muslim. I told you he was trolling before but you kept calling me a qabilist and that I defended him just because he was from my tribe.

You didn't believe me. :ivers:

Now who's right?

68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f6e3549756e39566c6267776955773d3d2d3337313830353637352e313461326230346130636335623030613335333134383639393839342e676966
 
I'm a Deist.

Basically, there probably is a God, but he is not a personal one and never contacted humanity. Het set up the laws of physics and the created the universe and through evolution created humans.
What about all the signs the prophet saw said that came true surely it's not luck islam is the real religion face it guys
 
The burden of proof is on the person making a positive claim as in God exist.

Furthermore belief requires a reason and lack of empirical proof or evidence to the contrary makes the belief baseless.
Watch the link and tell me how it's possible for someone to see the future so much Allah is the one true God face it steam you can have 72 virgins in jannah don't waste that for ten secs of pleasure in this dunya
 
The burden of proof is on the person making a positive claim as in God exist.

Furthermore belief requires a reason and lack of empirical proof or evidence to the contrary makes the belief baseless.

You didn't adress my argument. You're claiming that only empiricism amounts to true proof, which is false. That assertion itself cannot be proven by empiricism which makes makes your argument self-destructive.

Secondly, there are other methods that lead to knowledge like deduction and testimony which means that the abcense of empirical proofs is not a proof of Allaahs non-existence, as his existence can be proven through other routes.
 
You didn't adress my argument. You're claiming that only empiricism amounts to true proof, which is false. That assertion itself cannot be proven by empiricism which makes makes your argument self-destructive.

Secondly, there are other methods that lead to knowledge like deduction and testimony which means that the abcense of empirical proofs is not a proof of Allaahs non-existence, as his existence can be proven through other routes.

It is not self-destructive, the person making the claim have to proof the claim or assertion, and there is no empirical proof for God's existence as it stands today.

Lack of empirical proof does not mean lack of existence correct, but empirically speaking there is as much evidence for God's existence as there is for the Spaghetti monster, they are equal claims scientifically speaking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top