First off all the people I know who are married from all cultures are married to women who wear hijab or niqab.
Anyways If a woman is displaying her beauty/awrah to non mahram men and a guy marries her knowing that and she carries on like that then he's a dayooth because that's immodesty on her part and a dayooth is person who is apathetic or permissive with regard to immodest behaviour by female relatives or a spouse. He went in knowing she's a non hijabi and the context of my post is that she died a non hijabi.
If a woman later on takes it off and doesn't listen to advice then that is different and that person isn't considered a dayooth.
And I'm not harming Muslims with my tongue I'm just saying it as it is. I didn't call any actual individuals out for it to be considered "harming with my tongue"
actually thats not what a dayooth is, a dayooth is a man who takes pleasure in his wife being with other men or has no care if she sleeps with other men, that is what the meaning of dayuuth is, to qualify for it your wife must commit zina with other men and you must know about it and not care, thats a cuckhold
a man not caring if his wife leaves his house without hijab lacks gheerah but does not qualify to be called a dayuuth as that is not the meaning of the word and to label anyone as that is extreme as being a dayuuth is a extreme major sin and marrying a women who doesn't wear hijab or let her not wear hijab outside the house is not a major sin.
Also, the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasalams wives did not wear full hijab and abaya before the verses were sent down so according to your understanding the Prophet sallallahu alayhi waslaam and the sahaba would have all been dayuuth for letting their wives go outside not dressed modestly, when we know that isn't true, and being a dayuuth is not restricted to after the revelation as being a dayuuth is something known and is disgusting whether a person knows the punishment for being a dayuuth or not whereas the specific commandments about what women can wear can vary and if a man lets his wife wearing things outside that is not very revealing he cannot be labelled as a dayuuth
here is an example
Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: A man came to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and said: "My wife does not object if anyone touches her." He said: "Divorce her." The man said: "I am afraid that I will miss her." The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Then enjoy her."
Sahih/Authentic. - [An-Nasaa’i]
Explanation
The Hadīth indicates that a Companion came to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) seeking advice concerning his wife. The man told the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) that his wife did not object if anyone touched her. The scholars had a great difference of opinion over the meaning of this statement. The preponderant opinion is that the woman did not avoid men and did not object to a person who touched her seeking thereby to enjoy her, or that she did not keep away from men and was not reserved in speech to them and did not screen herself from them such that they would touch her body, or they would shake hands with her and she would not avoid that. This does not mean that she would consent to adultery, because the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would not approve the man’s marriage to an adulteress. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) firstly advised the man to part with her, out of sympathy for him to stay with such a woman. However, the man informed the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about his deep love for his wife and his fear that he would miss her if he were to leave her. Then the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) felt that it was beneficial in this situation for the man to remain with his wife, for fear of the harm that would be caused by separation. Therefore, averting greater harm by engaging in an issue with lesser harm is a necessity. Moreover, the woman could probably reform in the future. Allah, the Exalted, knows best.
so, here we know, the man shouldn't have stayed with the women, but he was not a cukhold/dayuuth, as the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasalam would object to that, especially if it was a major sin