Yeah they have more admixture I guess.
Somalis have the least J DNA (Arab) out of the Horn of Africa ethnic groups
- Thread starter Bohol
- Start date
- Status
do you know who the precushitic group were
DuctTape
I have an IQ of 300
Apparently they were quite similar to Nilotic groups like the Dinka.
I don't think there's any way of knowing what they looked like, but going from what some Somalis can look like, I think they look like a lot of modern Nilotic groups today. It explains why there's so much variation in the way we look.
Hararis are 100% Habesha. However, many of them do not identify with the Habesha label due to it being so synonymous with the Ethiopian Christian Orthodox Church. But nevertheless, Hararis still originated from the ancient Kingdom of Aksum and are thus "Habesha" in terms of genetics. They also speak a Semetic language.
"Hararis are 100% Habesha."
he just told you habesha is cultural term. even within them the admixture is varied. in fact i think when he posted his results he got 30 something percent non horner dna if i am not mistaken.
just looking at hararis alone you will see there is more to their story than just habesha
good pointApparently they were quite similar to Nilotic groups like the Dinka.
I don't think there's any way of knowing what they looked like, but going from what some Somalis can look like, I think they look like a lot of modern Nilotic groups today. It explains why there's so much variation in the way we look.
We need to take back our rightful land.
Operation invade XABESHA,DJIBOUTI, SUDAN AND EGYPT
and get back our rightful land @XamarCade I make you leader of this operation 
if J is arab then this makes no sense though. how are afars identical with amhara.So why do they claim Arabs? Heck even the Gambela has more J DNA.@AbdiJohnson
was right when he said a large number of Somalis are Arab booty clappers.
gambela i would assume is from habesha contribution which would explain the latter's look
lets take back mogadishu from brundi first
We need to take back our rightful land.
Operation invade XABESHA,DJIBOUTI, SUDAN AND EGYPT
Bohol
VIP
if J is arab then this makes no sense though. how are afars identical with amhara.
gambela i would assume is from habesha contribution which would explain the latter's look
Those Afars are properly assimilated Afars in the Afar region and not real Afars.
It is believable though a lot of Afar women have soft hair and caramel skin.
so your whole thread is BS thenThose Afars are properly assimilated Afars in the Afar region and not real Afars.
It is believable though a lot of Afar women have soft hair and caramel skin.
.
So much suugo-science in one thread.
@Endriam If Cushitic is a linguistic group, then so is Somali, you imbecile. Languages come from people. People have ancestry. The reason some afars have higher J haplo is irrelevant (heck even some nilotic groups have a lot of J and E3b), I doubt it is because they are more admixed than say Somalis or Oromos. It may be just an ethnic group with a higher haplogroup diversity. What matters is autosomal DNA, not haplogroups - otherwise people from Greece, Southern Italy and Albania have Somali ancestry.
You are also forgetting that many of the Cushitic languages form a substratum base for the Ethio-Semitic languages and even some south Arabian languages. Which means any genetic similarities is due to them having Cushitic ancestry not the other way around.
@Endriam If Cushitic is a linguistic group, then so is Somali, you imbecile. Languages come from people. People have ancestry. The reason some afars have higher J haplo is irrelevant (heck even some nilotic groups have a lot of J and E3b), I doubt it is because they are more admixed than say Somalis or Oromos. It may be just an ethnic group with a higher haplogroup diversity. What matters is autosomal DNA, not haplogroups - otherwise people from Greece, Southern Italy and Albania have Somali ancestry.
You are also forgetting that many of the Cushitic languages form a substratum base for the Ethio-Semitic languages and even some south Arabian languages. Which means any genetic similarities is due to them having Cushitic ancestry not the other way around.
Young Popeye
Call me pops
Habesha is a linguistic and cultural term rather than genetic, Bilen and Saho's are not really considered Habesha.
Genetically they are probably more closer.
Hararis arent Habesha either
I've never even met Harari's to even comment on them
.
Xaagi-Cagmadigtee
Guul ama Dhimasho
This is what matters to me in order of significance: paternal haplogroup, Y-DNA; followed by autosomal DNA; and lastly maternal haplogroup, mtDNA.
Side note: few Xabashi (Amhars and Tigrays) I came across have vastly different paternal haplogroup than either Somalis or many Oromos, Afars. They are neither Cushitic, nor Semitic, mostly Nilotic with Yemeni admixture....real mutts for last 2,500 years.
Side note: few Xabashi (Amhars and Tigrays) I came across have vastly different paternal haplogroup than either Somalis or many Oromos, Afars. They are neither Cushitic, nor Semitic, mostly Nilotic with Yemeni admixture....real mutts for last 2,500 years.
Last edited:
- Status
