Somalis are too superstitious as a people

[Steamdevolopment]

Whaat ? there are all kinds of characters on this forum, but this new young absolutely takes the biscuit

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/women-are-so-boring.48974/page-4#post-1344446

I suspect this is @Geeljire lotus new acount

 

[Geeljire lotus]

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/women-are-so-boring.48974/page-4#post-1344446

I suspect this is @Geeljire lotus new acount

False wtf lool

 

[munira]

There is difference between asking whether we exist and weather exist inside a simulation or are a part of some cosmic game. Whether we exist can be proven trough empirical evidence by physicist to determine that we are in fact made of atoms or trough abductive reasoning, that we're a conscious, only living things can be conscious and therefore we exist.

Furthermore you're committing a straw-man by assuming a person that I don't have, which is that only empirical evidence is valid, which isn't the case. Science is not perfect, it is merely the best tool available to understand the world and which we trough reasoning can make determinations about that which is true or false.

You choose to rely on blind-faith and arguments based on logical fallacies, the height of irrationality.
Show me a peer-reviewed evidence for God's existence and then we'll talk, not just evidence which can be anything when you disregard the best tool for understand the world.

Umm I thought I clearly stated that science can’t prove we are not living in a STIMULATION. So you’re first paragraph was unnecessary.

I don’t understand what you mean when you say ‘a person I don’t have’. The beginning of your second paragraph makes no sense.
But anyways, science is the best thing YOU have to understand the world. Alhamdulilah I have the deen of Allah.

Lastly, you’re asking for science to proof the existence of God. Can science disproof God?
Science cannot proof nor disproof the existence of God. So with your logic, you should be agnostic not atheist.

But I have reasons to belief the existence of God and the only science I need is the basic concept of cause and effect.
If you want to know how cause and effect is a reason to believe in God, then by all means tell me and I would be happy to explain.

 

[munira]

What planet do you live on kulaha science can not provide evidence that we exist so what now your some fantastical phantom commenting on this forum through what ever device that was created through science, and then to top it of you end your reply by saying don't believe in scientifical fact, but believe in some fictitious deity on pure blind faith your on something

Okay umm. Again alhamdulilah I’m Muslim so I’m not a ‘fantanstical phantom’ or whatever. But as an atheist, why aren’t you open to this theory. You may be living in a stimulation.

Can you disproof the stimulation theory??

Yeah, the device I’m using was created using science. I’m lost on how this fact is relevant.

And I can tell you aren’t the sharpest, you should leave all the atheistic talk to @Steamdevolopment.
A scientific fact isn’t an absolute fact, science is forever changing. A scientific fact that is factual now may be disproven in two years time.

 

[munira]

False wtf lool

Don’t worry, last week I was @Knowles, now I’m you. Who knows who I’ll be in a weeks time.

 

[munira]

Whaat ? there are all kinds of characters on this forum, but this new young absolutely takes the biscuit

Awww, I love you too

 

[munira]

We were edgy teenagers too, let her grow and mature.


Yesterday we caught her erasing history and claiming that untermensch had no nazi heritage.
She'll ignore even the most profound evidence

I wasn’t erasing history. That word that I can’t say due to @Emily wasn’t ONLY used by the socialists. Yes, the leader of the socialist used it in his book, but it only means SUBHUMAN in german.

Honestly, you’re so xenophobic.

 

[Emily]

I wasn’t erasing history. That word that I can’t say due to @Emily wasn’t ONLY used by the socialists. Yes, the leader of the socialist used it in his book, but it only means SUBHUMAN in german.

Honestly, you’re so xenophobic.

B stop mentioning my name
I can’t stand your racist ass

 

[munira]

B stop mentioning my name
I can’t stand your racist ass

Loool, are you gonna report me for mentioning your name now? And racist is a strong word.
I’m not a racist I love all human beings.
They just have to be human for me to love them.

And don’t misinterpret what I said.

 

[Baki]

Okay umm. Again alhamdulilah I’m Muslim so I’m not a ‘fantanstical phantom’ or whatever. But as an atheist, why aren’t you open to this theory. You may be living in a stimulation.

Can you disproof the stimulation theory??

Yeah, the device I’m using was created using science. I’m lost on how this fact is relevant.

And I can tell you aren’t the sharpest, you should leave all the atheistic talk to @Steamdevolopment.
A scientific fact isn’t an absolute fact, science is forever changing. A scientific fact that is factual now may be disproven in two years time.

1st of all there are many theories out there, doesn't mean i go by all of them i go for the most reasonable one that is mostly backed by tangible proof, the simulation theory at the current moment is nothing more then a hypothesis, so you saying can i disproof the simulation theory makes absolute no sense.

And me being a Atheist what has that to do with anything ?,
By the way do you even know the meaning of what scientific fact even means ?

In the most basic sense, a scientific fact is an objective and verifiable observation, in contrast with a hypothesis or theory, which is intended to explain or interpret facts.

Let me go back to what you stated saying that science can't proof our existence by the means of
"simulation theory", yes i agree with you it can't at the moment since this theory is mostly a hypothesis, but science can and has already proven our existence i can't even belief i'm arguing about this where do you think biology comes from ?

The whole premise of your argument is absurd and it don't make sense in the slightest, at one point your saying do away with science and that science can't proof that we exist, if we don't exist how the hell i'm i typing this comment to you through a laptop that was created through science, and then you go ahead and say come back to your creator a fictional deity that no one has and never ever will have any proof or any evidence of that it exists,

Your a child that's just talking for the sake of talking, you hardly or don't even know the terms your slinging around such as scientific fact, Simulation theory etc, and my last but not final point when your debating and bringing forward a argument/idea you need to make concise points, so people can understand you clearly because you're all over the place, for a 16 year old you come of as extremely arrogant and obtuse.

"A wise man knows he doesn't know everything. A fool thinks he knows everything"

 

[munira]

1st of all there are many theories out there, doesn't mean i go by all of them i go for the most reasonable one that is mostly backed by tangible proof, the simulation theory at the current moment is nothing more then a hypothesis, so you saying can i disproof the simulation theory makes absolute no sense.

And me being a Atheist what has that to do with anything ?,
By the way do you even know the meaning of what scientific fact even means ?

In the most basic sense, a scientific fact is an objective and verifiable observation, in contrast with a hypothesis or theory, which is intended to explain or interpret facts.

Let me go back to what you stated saying that science can't proof our existence by the means of
"simulation theory", yes i agree with you it can't at the moment since this theory is mostly a hypothesis, but science can and has already proven our existence i can't even belief i'm arguing about this where do you think biology comes from ?

The whole premise of your argument is absurd and it don't make sense in the slightest, at one point your saying do away with science and that science can't proof that we exist, if we don't exist how the hell i'm i typing this comment to you through a laptop that was created through science, and then you go ahead and say come back to your creator a fictional deity that no one has and never ever will have any proof or any evidence of that it exists,

Your a child that's just talking for the sake of talking, you hardly or don't even know the terms your slinging around such as scientific fact, Simulation theory etc, and my last but not final point when your debating and bringing forward a argument/idea you need to make concise points, so people can understand you clearly because you're all over the place, for a 16 year old you come of as extremely arrogant and obtuse.

"A wise man knows he doesn't know everything. A fool thinks he knows everything"

Oh sorry for saying you weren’t the sharpest. I didn’t know it was going to trigger you. Again, my apologies.

 

[Baki]

Oh sorry for saying you aren’t the sharpest. I didn’t know it was going to trigger you. Again, my apologies.

It took you but a second to reply back and that tells me you didn't read a word of what i said, this is my last reply back to you have a good day.

 

[munira]

It took you but a second to reply back and that tells me you didn't read a word of what i said, this is my last reply back to you have a good day.

Umm, you must be a slower reader
I read everything in that ‘second’ and you sounded triggered - almost @Emily like.
Anyways Salaam.

 

[Emily]