The alchemist
VIP
I support equal rights, not a feminist. It boils down to dumb tribalism and labels.
Individualism always allow nationalism but nationalism only allow individualism if it's the goal of the state which is usually not the case. Individualism is about each people working together whenever they share value(out of either personal or collective(if they believe) interest). Individualists usually allow collectivists as long as they don't tread on unconsensual victim. On the other hand, collectivists usually do not do this. They want to put their value first and do not care about other. This lack of empathy is generally bad for the society. Even the most collectivistic people (rationally possible) would likely admit that a nation is too huge for all to share value.
God bless women.
Without women, I would have put my d*ck inside men instead.![]()
Equivalating manhood with penis size? Imagine if a man reduced womanhood to sex, vaginal functions or breast size. Perfect example of feminist hypocrisy right here folksI agree they are ugly, broke, with small manhood. Already two small d having niggas disliked this thread
It’s in the Quran and the Bible, plus men are natural born leaders and are also stronger than women and most civilisations have been built by men, most wars fought by men, the most difficult jobs are performed by men( building houses, sky scrapers, mining, railway etc.)
That’s the role of the man and his purpose other than worshipping the one true God. However the woman has her role which is a nurture and a helper to the man, like I said two different creations two different roles and responsibilities but I am 100% for equal rights.View attachment 66777
It’s the truth though anti feminists are small or in the closet. Which one are youEquivalating manhood with penis size? Imagine if a man reduced womanhood to sex, vaginal functions or breast size. Perfect example of feminist hypocrisy right here folks
Didn’t you read what I wrote?Lmao @HIGH PRIESTESS is mistaking misandrism with feminism. Feminism promotes femininity, gender, equality and women empowerment.
Equivalating manhood with penis size? Imagine if a man reduced womanhood to sex, vaginal functions or breast size. Perfect example of feminist hypocrisy right here folks
Didn’t you read what I wrote?I specifically stated that Western feminism is misandrist in nature and does not align with the true purpose of feminism which is female empowerment and liberation. It’s not me that’s confusing misandrism and feminism, it’s those clueless so-called feminists.
Neither. I'm not an anti-feminist. Feminism is not a clearly defined ideology. Like you already mentioned, it encompasses a wide set of beliefs and two different feminists can often hold contradicting ideas. Some feminist ideas make sense but others are outright ridiculous. I'm not much concerned with the label itself since it doesn't tell me what the feminist actually believes. Are you one of those feminists who campaign for equal rights in the workplace or the abolition of FGM, or are you one of those who believe that they will destroy the patriarchy by showing their armpit hair?It’s the truth though anti feminists are small or in the closet. Which one are you![]()
![]()
I see the definition of a "real man" has changed considerably. Say, has the defining what constitutes a man been hijacked by women?
It doesn't work in the West what are you talking about, what you think every country in the West is like France or the UK, everybody thinks for them selfs what you want someone to think for you ??
Your all over the place, your not putting forward one singular straight thought point, why I'm saying this for example the exact same thing your pushing for we have been doing it since forever!, and nothing has changed for the better doing the same thing over and over looking to get a different result each time is pure insanity, and you still want more of the same ishat this point i don't even know if your trolling or not, and the icing on the cake is you literally want to send us back to the medieval times, that small village you live in frog land has driven you up the wall.
View attachment 66776
![]()
I see the definition of a "real man" has changed considerably. Say, has the defining what constitutes a man been hijacked by women?
Delusional is synonymous with somalisYour delusional, but I hear your habesha so it might be all that kifto you eat. Maybe start cooking your hiilib and your brain cells might function to there maximum, my habesha macanay.View attachment 66781
Neither. I'm not an anti-feminist. Feminism is not a clearly defined ideology. Like you already mentioned, it encompasses a wide set of beliefs and two different feminists can often hold contradicting ideas. Some feminist ideas make sense but others are outright ridiculous. I'm not much concerned with the label itself since it doesn't tell me what the feminist actually believes. Are you one of those feminists who campaign for equal rights in the workplace or the abolition of FGM, or are you one of those who believe that they will destroy the patriarchy by showing their armpit hair?
Also, there is no correlation between penis size and a man's view on feminism. Radical feminists on the other hand tend to be fat, hairy and unloved. The fat acceptance movement is heavily (pun intended) associated with 3rd wave feminism