just did research, turns out @Shimbiris is right. All papers show that our HG ancestors were indeed monogamous. TBH, even our religious traditions illustrates that with with Adam and Eve and the earlier generations of mankind all marrying one woman. According to science, polygamy only comes about during the advent of agriculture and private property. Once men enter agricultural way of living and start the concept of private property and with that warring over property did humans start having multiple wives.
Marry A p0rnstar Farahs! Turn a h03 Into A Housewife!
- Thread starter Keep it a boqol
- Start date
just did research, turns out @Shimbiris is right. All papers show that our HG ancestors were indeed monogamous. TBH, even our religious traditions illustrates that with with Adam and Eve and the earlier generations of mankind all marrying one woman. According to science, polygamy only comes about during the advent of agriculture and private property. Once men enter agricultural way of living and start the concept of private property and with that warring over property did humans start having multiple wives.
Why? What’s weird about that. Once humans start to live in an agricultural way of life, you find that many women were sharing one man. Apparently, there was mass violence during that period and for the first time many women were left without partners. Also, society became rather greedy with certain men amassing more men. That is where the origins of polygamy stems from.
GuanYu
Custom title
Lmao I was thinking how can someone have more Woman ancestors, when it requires 1 female and 1 male to dilly dally, so we have equal number of females and males as ancestors
It refers to how, for example, most Somali males are dominated by subclades of two simple lineages:
E-Z813 YTree
T-Y45591 YTree
The vast majority of Somali men from Diridhabe to Caluulo and down to Garissa are all the descendants of two dudes who were alive as recently as the Bronze Age whereas in the case of our maternal lineages there were a lot more women we were descended from who were likely kicking during the Bronze-Age:
Somali mtDNA frequencies
While like I've said; I don't touch upon Uniparental data ( Y-DNA & mtDNA ) too much, I still thought sharing this data would be rather in...
anthromadness.blogspot.com
Now, a lot of this is due to bottle-necks and founder-effects that probably phased out other Cushitic lineages like E-V6, E-V22, E-M293 and A-M13 but, all in all, even with those added the female lineages vastly outnumber them which points to the tribal, pastoral and polygamous nature of our ancestors. A few men fathering a whole pre-historic tribe or subtribe, for example. And those few men were probably very well-off and owned large herds and commanded much influence and power and could phase out the rest.
One male and multiple females. A man can impregnate a whole village.
Would it be a case of majority of men being forced with celibacy or was society very violent? I can’t imagine society being peaceful, if men had to watch from the sidelines a few men being able to procreate. So I’m guessing many would often die in battle or what exactly? Men and women are generally equal in numbers.It refers to how, for example, most Somali males are dominated by subclades of two simple lineages:
E-Z813 YTree
www.yfull.com
T-Y45591 YTree
The vast majority of Somali men from Diridhabe to Caluulo and down to Garissa are all the descendants of two dudes who were alive as recently as the Bronze Age whereas in the case of our maternal lineages there were a lot more women we were descended from who were likely kicking during the Bronze-Age:
Somali mtDNA frequencies
While like I've said; I don't touch upon Uniparental data ( Y-DNA & mtDNA ) too much, I still thought sharing this data would be rather in...
Now, a lot of this is due to bottle-necks and founder-effects that probably phased out other Cushitic lineages like E-V6, E-V22, E-M293 and A-M13 but, all in all, even with those added the female lineages vastly outnumber them which points to the tribal, pastoral and polygamous nature of our ancestors. A few men fathering a whole pre-historic tribe or subtribe, for example. And those few men were probably very well-off and owned large herds and commanded much influence and power and could phase out the rest.
GuanYu
Custom title
It refers to how, for example, most Somali males are dominated by subclades of two simple lineages:
E-Z813 YTree
T-Y45591 YTree
The vast majority of Somali men from Diridhabe to Caluulo and down to Garissa are all the descendants of two dudes who were alive as recently as the Bronze Age whereas in the case of our maternal lineages there were a lot more women we were descended from who were likely kicking during the Bronze-Age:
Somali mtDNA frequencies
While like I've said; I don't touch upon Uniparental data ( Y-DNA & mtDNA ) too much, I still thought sharing this data would be rather in...
Now, a lot of this is due to bottle-necks and founder-effects that probably phased out other Cushitic lineages like E-V6, E-V22, E-M293 and A-M13 but, all in all, even with those added the female lineages vastly outnumber them which points to the tribal, pastoral and polygamous nature of our ancestors. A few men fathering a whole pre-historic tribe or subtribe, for example. And those few men were probably very well-off and owned large herds and commanded much influence and power and could phase out the rest.
I see, Yes then I am way out of my Depth here
Admirable to admit but it's no big deal, walaalkay. Can easily learn this stuff.
Lol. So all of a sudden when men started eating vegetables that’s when they decided that they wanted multiple women? Somehow veggies changed our bodies and we decided to practice polygyny. QASHIN. By your same logic, we should also marry our sisters since adam’s children married each other.
No where in history did the human psyche change? our bodies and natural inclinations have always been the same. Our conditions only changed.
The early generations had to be monogamous by necessity. There weren’t hella women around. That doesn’t mean we’re monogamous by nature.
I think they always desired more women they just didn't have the environment to practice their desire
lets be honest no man wants just one women but they don't have the energy or ability to get multiple woman so they are stuck with one, if the society normalised it they would gp ahead with it straight away, for now they are forced to monogamy (usually for their own good) and just do stuff on the side
polgyny sounds like a nice idea but for most men it is a headache, its like when mike tyson said everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth
Instead most men would probably prefer to just commit zina with multiple woman (like ths society) instead of marrying multiple woman, thats just my take on it anyway
Lol. So all of a sudden when men started eating vegetables that’s when they decided that they wanted multiple women? Somehow veggies changed our bodies and we decided to practice polygyny. QASHIN. By your same logic, we should also marry our sisters since adam’s children married each other.
No where in history did the human psyche change? our bodies and natural inclinations have always been the same. Our conditions only changed.
The early generations had to be monogamous by necessity. There weren’t hella women around. That doesn’t mean we’re monogamous by nature.
How many sisters do u have?
I don't think angelina was saying men aren't polgynous by nature she is just pointing out that most men will be monogamous in their life and thats just the way life works so men acting like they have a right to do polgyny is stupid since most men have been monogamous and fine
Why do you think Dhulbahante and Isaaq men like to be monogamous? Are they more civilized than say- the Mjs who are notorious with polygamy
Hmm
Men who are not polygnous can usually control their animal desires(usually), I guess it would make it easier for them to have civilised character
although I will not generlise anyones qabeel
You don’t actually read people’s reply do you?Lol. So all of a sudden when men started eating vegetables that’s when they decided that they wanted multiple women? Somehow veggies changed our bodies and we decided to practice polygyny. QASHIN. By your same logic, we should also marry our sisters since adam’s children married each other.
No where in history did the human psyche change? our bodies and natural inclinations have always been the same. Our conditions only changed.
The early generations had to be monogamous by necessity. There weren’t hella women around. That doesn’t mean we’re monogamous by nature.
it had nothing to do with vegetables and everything to do with private property. Once men started to amass wealth for themselves, men started to fight intensively for resources which resulted in deaths of young men, some men being too poor and women having no choice but to be with the most wealthiest.
It is for that reason the Ancient Romans banned polygamous marriages. The west believes in monogamous marriages not because of Christianity but because Romans banning due to fears of rebellious men and violence.
You’ll probably reduce my point to vegetables as you don’t like to engage with people and simply reply to respond rather than understand and take information. Anyways, humans existed for at least 50 million, whilst supposedly we’ve only been polygamous for ten thousand.
You do get a lot of men who have means to be polygamous but are staunchly monogamous though. You see it throughout history. I think men are both monogamous and polygamous.
How polygamous would men be if their was no rich and poor and no wars? Probably not. In order for polygamy to thrive there needs to be an underclass of men and women who are wholly dependent on men’s wealth.
Why?
Islam recognizes that men can be both polygamous and monogamous. Also, Islam at the time was the only religion that limited men’s polygamy and added restrictions.
No they just dont want the headache of 2 women probably
All men(99%) would want another woman in some kind of way, which is why most men in the west in monogamous marriages cheat and have side woman, bc it takes no responsibility and they get to be with another woman
Also monogamy has alot of benefits of less headache and family politics, also get to keep ur wealth only to one family, also ppl just follow their culture maybe they never thought of marrying another woman, but all men desire to be with another woman, every man is like this, they just supress their desires and stick to their wife cos its an easier life to live
Trending
-
NSFW Breaking 🚨 conservative influencer Charlie Kirk shot in Utah
- Started by Chaseyourdreamzz
- Replies: 490
-
Charlie Kirk's killer identified as Tyler Robinson of Utah.
- Started by Lightshow
- Replies: 39
-
Latest posts
-
-
-
NSFW Breaking 🚨 conservative influencer Charlie Kirk shot in Utah- Latest: Fobnimo Till I Dhimo