BANTU
+op MVLI
Do you have proof of compulsion or not?Stay out of this walaalo this is ahlul sunnah business![]()
Do you have proof of compulsion or not?Stay out of this walaalo this is ahlul sunnah business![]()
One is unreliable, and the other is the cornerstone of Islam, sit down you salafi.The Sunnah is derived from the Hadith, where do you think the source is..![]()
Do you have proof of compulsion or not?
So, at the McDonald's cow killing factory they say "in the name of Cthulu" every time they slaughter a cow?
Dedicated to capitalism? I don't get your logic, having no dedication = not dedicated to other than Allah.It says dedicated to other than Allah. They don't have to yell Cthulu every time to kill a cow for it to not be dedicated to Allah
I take it you don't follow any school of thoughts?
Ameen!f*ck HADITHS. Allah clearly stated that he brought down the Quran as a guide for us. We don't need anything else my niggas
One is unreliable, and the other is the cornerstone of Islam, sit down you salafi.
Weak as f*ck, unreliable, usually contradicts the Quran, lmao.
Dedicated to capitalism? I don't get your logic, having no dedication = not dedicated to other than Allah.
I don't follow any school of thought, but whatever school of thought that brings the type of logic you provided isn't worth my time
Should be and has to be are two very different things.Haye,
"... So mention the name of Allah upon them when lined up [for sacrifice]; and when they are [lifeless] on their sides, then eat from them and feed the needy and the beggar. Thus have We subjected them to you that you may be grateful." - Al Hajj 22:36
This clearly implies that Allah's name should be mentioned when slaughtering animals in order for it to be considered permissible meat, which McDonald's doesn't
Aaaand now it makes sense why you thought it was extreme![]()
Should be and has to be are two very different things.
It's extreme because you have yet to provide proof, it's extreme you would take something for fact that you can't support
It is illogical, don't use an appeal to authority. If you're done, you're done whatever.
Alright, I'm done. You can take that however you want to. I'm just going to go ahead with my interpretation along with the illogical consensus of pretty much all scholars.
It is illogical, don't use an appeal to authority. If you're done, you're done whatever.
You provided this verse already![]()
It literally said so in the verse I quoted and you're telling me I'm providing no evidence of my claim. Should be not has to be ku te. What else do you want to extend that to? Fasting? Praying? Hajj?
Again
"(6:121) Do not eat of (the animal) over which the name of Allah has not been pronounced (at the time of its slaughtering), for that is a transgression. And behold, the evil ones do inspire doubts and objections into the hearts of their friends so that they dispute with you;86 but if you obey them, you will surely yourselves turn into those who associate others with Allah in His divinity."
This shows the previous was in reference to slaughtering.
It just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your decision
I rarely eat halaal slaughtered food at home, and it was the same growing up.I didn't even know Somalis eating haram food was a thing. You eat halal food at home and then eat whatever when you're out? Makes no sense.
You provided this verse alreadyjust this one has an interpretation that fits your belief
The Quran clarifies that it is in reference to slaughtering? You're confusing meYes, hence the again. It clarifies that it is in reference to slaughtering.
If you refuse that, it's whatever because following your logic you can pick what you deem is compulsory and recommended anyway.
The Quran clarifies that it is in reference to slaughtering? You're confusing me