AdoonkaAlle
Ragna qowl baa xira, dumarna meher baa xira.
“Types of surgical forms ;(a) Circumcision or Sunna (“traditional”) circumcision: This involves the removal of the prepuce and the tip of the clitoris. This is the only operation which, medically, can be likened to male circumcision”[11]
Only a small bit of skin is taken not the whole hood. It’s meant to be the tip.
The type of female circumcision which is permitted in Islam entails cutting piece of the thin skin (prepuce) which is above the clitoris in a manner mentioned by the Prophet ﷺ (لا تنهكي) i.e. without exaggeration. Therefore, the method of female circumcision does not entail cutting any part of the clitoris or labia
Type 1 will involve cutting of the clitoris. The sunnah is to cut only a bit of the skin.
Removal of any of isn’t allowed:
The type of female circumcision which is permitted in Islam entails cutting piece of the thin skin (prepuce) which is above the clitoris in a manner mentioned by the Prophet ﷺ (لا تنهكي) i.e. without exaggeration. Therefore, the method of female circumcision does not entail cutting any part of the clitoris or labia
Hence removing any part of the clitoris is indeed mutilation. Why are you defending that?
What is the ruling of Shari’ah on female circumcision? - IslamQA
Question: What is the most preferred view on female circumcision? Did Prophet Muhammad ﷺ allow it for females and why? جزاك الله جيرا Answer: بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Female Circumcision in Islam Theislamqa.org
I was talking about the circumcision that happens in Gambia so why do I have talk about the West in order for me to say that Pagan circumcision is haram? To call
Something mutation do I have to list every form of other mutilation?
Let’s get this straight, if something is haram and of no benefit it’s mutilation. It’s as simple as that.
Female genitical mutilation. Cutting the clitoris is mutilation of the genitalia that belong to females. It’s as simple.
Type III is indeed 19% overall. Let’s not lie.
Look at the data again properly.
I’m talking about Type 1-3 that’s haram. Also, you can never say that type 3 doesn’t cause health risks even if done in the hospital. That’s a terrible lie of the highest order. When you seal a woman up it causes issues with periods and even urine as it’s now coming from one hole. I’m sorry to get graphic but it’s absurd what you’re saying Wallahi.
Also, why would you want to medicalize the haram? If you simply said only the Islamic type should be allowed and the rest should be banned, would I even bother going back and forth with you?
Firstly, cadaan mutilation isn’t common at all. It happens with trans which I find disgusting and then you have women in the corn industry who might have a big Labia trying to reduce it which another issue and I find it disgusting to be franks is it another flip of the coin, straight up misogyny. Whilst I can acknowledge all times are haram unless it’s a medical need, you simply can’t and will make excuses by using the West as an example.
How about you actually stop advocating and cheering on haram practices and simply stick what’s right instead of being a weird Afrocentric who’ll champion African paganism practices.
Like I stated earlier you’re just all over of the place, continuously contradicting yourself.
You cited the following definition:
“ Types of surgical forms ;(a) Circumcision or Sunna (“traditional”) circumcision: This involves the removal of the prepuce and the tip of the clitoris. This is the only operation which, medically, can be likened to male circumcision “
What you cited falls under type 1 fgm as defined by WHO. On # 34 I even posted the exact definition from WHO clearly indicating that the sunnah circumcision you cited above is included in type 1 fgm
Types of FGM
Female genital mutilation is classified into 4 major types:
Type 1: This is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans).
Type 2: This is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans and the labia minora (the inner folds of the vulva), with or without removal of the labia majora (the outer folds of skin of the vulva).
Type 3: Also known as infibulation, this is the narrowing of the vaginal opening through the creation of a covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and repositioning the labia minora, or labia majora, sometimes through stitching, with or without removal of the clitoral prepuce/clitoral hood and glans.
Type 4: This includes all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, e.g., pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterizing the genital area.
Female genital mutilation
Female genital mutilation (FGM) includes procedures that intentionally alter or cause injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons.
www.who.int
Type 1 that you were continuously claiming to be haram includes the sunnah circumcision as evidenced from that definition of fgm by WHO. The fact you don’t even realise just how much you’re contradicting yourself is shocking.
Even more astonishing is your selective usage of “mutilation” to only describe African modifications but not cadaan modifications.
“ Firstly, cadaan mutilation isn’t common at all. It happens with trans which I find disgusting and then you have women in the corn industry who might have a big Labia trying to reduce it which another issue and I find it disgusting to be franks is it another flip of the coin, straight up misogyny. Whilst I can acknowledge all times are haram unless it’s a medical need, you simply can’t and will make excuses by using the West as an example.”
In the above pic the fgcs equivalent alterations to fgm are listed side by side to show the similarities in the procedures. Yet despite the similarities you continue to call african alterations muitilation but not their european counterparts why is this ? I even asked if a Gambian goes to a hospital & chooses to undergo labiaplasty procedure is this muitilation ?
It’s your ideological bias that prevents you from accepting those clear cut facts. This why I stated your aversion to this issue had an ideological basis & not just transgressions of Islamic limits.