Obviously yes but the prophet Muhammad himself was a merchant for a long time and Uthman and other sahabbis were ridiculously rich which shows that Islam has no qualms with private enterprise. As long as it's being conducted ethically and there is an appreciation for the unfortunate.
I think all public property should be owned by the government and highly regulated, meaning it should be leased and not sold as a freehold land. They should also not be inheritable to offspring who did not work the land themselves and can sell it at a profit. Personal property and goods is yours but all means of production particularly land should be publicly owned.
That's a country that has been under sanctions for most of its existence. You can argue the only reason it has survived till now is cause they work as a collective, however brutal it may be.
There's a reason the US and EU are rich and can sanction poor communists on a whim. They're just better.
Obviously regulated capitalism, but thats why i said complete free market capitalism.
Bruh you're rejecting private property ie land ownership ??? That's against Islamic principles lol. Why should the state own the land in your opinion?
What was Somalia before the war? With MSB, there was free healthcare, free education. No welfare ofc, but it wasn’t pure capitalism. I think Somalis do best with a dictator, it’s the only way we’ll listen.
Yeah they are better at war cause they practice a system that allows for the exploitation of the working man.
Socialism is just an inefficient management of the working man by bureaucrats instead of capitalists by your reasoning thenYeah they are better at war cause they practice a system that allows for the exploitation of the working man.
You could make the exact same argument against capitalism, the fact that somalis only care about their only family and qabil would make it so only a certian group of people would hold the power , we see it right now, there is barely any goverment in somali and complete free market, somalis dont give a f*ck about qualification and only hire their close family and qabil.
All private property should be under the state. It should be leased on a temporary basis for instance during a lifetime but it should not be hereditary property. I think the state should own it cause it lessens the profit motive people have. There's less room for price manipulation, exploitation such as wage theft. The average worker would get their fair share.
You consider exploitation to be efficient?
What do you think the state is? You know theyre just some humans right? Why should we let a few individuals control all the private property?
Prvate proberty aside, do you believe in personal proberty?
Free markets but with a little bit more restrictions.
The state is all of us, the beneficiaries of the production. We who voted in the people that represent our interest and can remove them through the ballot.
