We should be always grateful to the White man

Juke

Asagu/Asaga
VIP
I'm fully aware of that, but no group has committed as much genocide, even the Romans who conquered most of Europe, North Africa and half of the middle east did not do that. They dominated, subdued, but Romanized them and changed their culture for the better to such an extent that some of the generals were originally from conquered lands loyal to Rome.

No other group has ever done it because they didn't have the capability. Besides the overwhelming majority of native Americans died because of disease not violence.

Bantus when they were expanding committed genocide many groups during their expansion from west africa.

Somalis genocide all the Borana/Wardey living in Jubaland when they expanded into their territory.

Mongols/Turks genocides 30% of Iranians (mostly men) during their expansion and Chinese genocided tens of millions of the natives of Southern China.

I don't hate whites because they conquered the world.

I hate them because they're not my people and I'd rather my ancestors done it.
 
Yep, thanks for correction.
You are confusing Arawak Tainos and Island Caribs. Arawaks are still around and can also be found in South America, Caribs are extremely small in number and have some populations in some Caribbean islands.

Wait, wait

I was just reading about then now. It seems that Tainos no longer exist they lived in Jamaica to puerto Rico.

They hardly exist.
 

Gambar

VIP
No other group has ever done it because they didn't have the capability. Besides the overwhelming majority of native Americans died because of disease not violence.

Bantus when they were expanding committed genocide many groups during their expansion from west africa.

Somalis genocide all the Borana/Wardey living in Jubaland when they expanded into their territory.

Mongols/Turks genocides 30% of Iranians (mostly men) during their expansion and Chinese genocided tens of millions of the natives of Southern China.

I don't hate whites because they conquered the world.

I hate them because they're not my people and I'd rather my ancestors done it.
Somalis would’ve conquered all of Africa if they were able to and didn’t have meddlers involved. Half of Africa would probably be speaking Somali and Somalia wouldn’t allow them to seek refuge. Cadaan definitely have more naxaris or guilt rather.
 
No other group has ever done it because they didn't have the capability. Besides the overwhelming majority of native Americans died because of disease not violence.

Bantus when they were expanding committed genocide many groups during their expansion from west africa.

Somalis genocide all the Borana/Wardey living in Jubaland when they expanded into their territory.

Mongols/Turks genocides 30% of Iranians (mostly men) during their expansion and Chinese genocided tens of millions of the natives of Southern China.

I don't hate whites because they conquered the world.

I hate them because they're not my people and I'd rather my ancestors done it.

All of those group committed genocide against there neighbours which unfortunately part of human history.

The Romans most definitely could have done it and had the capability. They conquered nearly all of Europe to the middle east, to North Africa. What do you mean they couldn't? They managed to change the identities of people in all different parts of the world.

Even the Islamic empire, from the far corners of the Maghrib to the other side of Sind.

Walaal, yes Natives died of diseases, but it is well known it was biological warfare. They purposely gave them small pox, along with other diseases. I mean, there are more ways to skin a cat I suppose...
:urgh:
 

Juke

Asagu/Asaga
VIP
Somalis would’ve conquered all of Africa if they were able to and didn’t have meddlers involved. Half of Africa would probably be speaking Somali and Somalia wouldn’t allow them to seek refuge. Cadaan definitely have more naxaris or guilt rather.
I remember reading a report from British colonials about how they saved the Bantus/Maasai from the Somalis because if they weren't there Somalis would've conquered them. :silanyolaugh:
 
All of those group committed genocide against there neighbours which unfortunately part of human history.

The Romans most definitely could have done it and had the capability. They conquered nearly all of Europe to the middle east, to North Africa. What do you mean they couldn't? They managed to change the identities of people in all different parts of the world.

Even the Islamic empire, from the far corners of the Maghrib to the other side of Sind.

Walaal, yes Natives died of diseases, but it is well known it was biological warfare. They purposely gave them small pox, along with other diseases. I mean, there are more ways to skin a cat I suppose...
:urgh:
Romans are white too?
 
They’re a sub tribe of Arawaks who still exist. They are not the only natives.

Does it change the fact that they killed more than 90% of their people? Or the other people on my list?

Saying Somalis would have, doesn't change the fact they didn't although it would be interesting to see how Somalis would have behaved if they had the same military might.

Would they have killed of whole groups of people, or force them to speak Somali and dominate them in every way? Who knows.
 

Juke

Asagu/Asaga
VIP
All of those group committed genocide against there neighbours which unfortunately part of human history.

The Romans most definitely could have done it and had the capability. They conquered nearly all of Europe to the middle east, to North Africa. What do you mean they couldn't? They managed to change the identities of people in all different parts of the world.

Even the Islamic empire, from the far corners of the Maghrib to the other side of Sind.

Walaal, yes Natives died of diseases, but it is well known it was biological warfare. They purposely gave them small pox, along with other diseases. I mean, there are more ways to skin a cat I suppose...
:urgh:
Roman empire was made up of Mediterranean peoples. Those people always contact with another and are the same race.
 
Does it change the fact that they killed more than 90% of their people? Or the other people on my list?

Saying Somalis would have should have, doesn't change the fact they didn't although it would be interesting to see how Somalis would have behaved if they had the same military might.

Would they have killed of whole groups of people, or force them to speak Somali and dominate them in every way? Who knows.
Probably not as Muslims. Somali's also shit.
 

Helios

Certified Liin Distributor
AQOONYAHAN
VIP
@Mehdi Hassan @Gambar @Halimak how did you get dragged this deep into semantics? Whites knowingly massacred and genocided Native Americans, and Carribean natives are so langaab and have been wiped out or assimilated in nearly all cases. There's no debating this
:yousmart:

@Jimmer sometimes the Americans, French, and British would spread disease deliberately to cripple hostile native tribes. Ever heard of small pox blankets? Once they realized they used it as a chemical weapon they abused it.

Either way though I agree Cadaans aren't uniquely evil, and the Iroqouis on the behest of the English almost entirely wiped out their eternal enemies - the Algonquin from most of their traditional territory and happily massacred them.

Some tribes under the foot of the Aztecs also quickly switched to the Conquistadors side and helped Hernan Cortes annihilate the Aztec Empire and people.

tldr Humans are humans, no one is truly a guiltless victim, but some did suffer deeply no doubt.
:ufdup:
 
Roman empire was made up of Mediterranean peoples. Those people always contact with another and are the same race.

It stretched to France, Spain ect, at the time they were not the same, they were Celts, the original inhabitants of Britain. They were closer to the Welsh in heritage and language, rather than Italic. They adopted the latin language as it was forced on them.

North Africa was Berber and the Lebanese, Palestinians were Phoneican and Jewish.

They were not the same people at all.
 

Diaspora ambassador

''Dagaalka gala'' Garaad Jaamac Garaad Cali
VIP
If the whites never visited us we wouldn't have been in the west with these numbers

They fucked us up to, mainly ourselves however they were supporting the anarchists willingly.


I hope their nation burns just like ours did. Burn baby burn
 

Gambar

VIP
Does it change the fact that they killed more than 90% of their people? Or the other people on my list?

Saying Somalis would have, doesn't change the fact they didn't although it would be interesting to see how Somalis would have behaved if they had the same military might.

Would they have killed of whole groups of people, or force them to speak Somali and dominate them in every way? Who knows.
Yes it does cause you made it seem as if Tainos are the natives of the Caribbean when they’re a sub tribe.

Somalis would have dominated and forced people to speak Somali. The only difference would be they’d never allow them to lay claim to the land if they are shisheeye. Most people speak European languages not because they chose to, it was by force.
 

Juke

Asagu/Asaga
VIP
It stretched to France, spain, at the time they were not the same, they were Celts, the original inhabitants of Britain. North Africa was Berber and the Lebanese, Palestinians were Phoneican and Jewish.
They were not the same people at all.
Roman civilization comes form the Greek civilization which ultimately comes from Phoenician/Canaanite and Egyptian civilizations.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top