Garaad diinle
We go by the rules of ijma'. It really doesn't matter if one sahabi said something contrary.There are many things he didn't allow his people to do which are permissible, because it would lead to a bigger harm
We go by the rules of ijma'. It really doesn't matter if one sahabi said something contrary.There are many things he didn't allow his people to do which are permissible, because it would lead to a bigger harm
Look if your talking about an absolute non mixing you're right there are no rulings against it as far as i know. You could say hajj is a free mixing. That's not what i mean with freemixing. There are boundaries between non mehram stated in the quran and sunnah that we muslims must follow.Nope, that doesn't say anything about free mixing, one of them is seclusion, one of them is only in the mosque, and one of them is just to do with lowering gaze, nowhere does it say anyting about free mixing
In fact when you go out everyday you have to free mix, if freemixing was haram in and within itself you wouldn't be allowed to go outside,
Nah i gotta say it developed into an interesting tangent and i can proudly say i learned a lot.8 pages arguing if you can sleep with a teen![]()
Huh? that has nothing to do with what I am saying, Most issues have no Ijmaa', and this entire conversation is not about Ijmaa' its about permissible thigns being not allowed for a greater benefit.We go by the rules of ijma'. It really doesn't matter if one sahabi said something contrary.
Just because you love your western ideals more than Islam doesn't mean you need to project it onto us8 pages arguing if you can sleep with a teen![]()
Yes but the whole issue of free mixing is not clear and has alot of ikhtilaaf and therefore a ruler must make a decision based on what he deems to be harmful to soceity and not because there is not clear text on itLook if your talking about an absolute non mixing you're right there are no rulings against it as far as i know. You could say hajj is a free mixing. That's not what i mean with freemixing. There are boundaries between non mehram stated in the quran and sunnah that we muslims must follow.
Just because you love your western ideals more than Islam doesn't mean you need to project it onto us
I will criticise western culture as much as I want, I didn't get a choice to live here, I was born here, plus, are you a Muslim? I find it interesting that if you live in a country you are not allowed to criticise it, you sounding like a madkhali bootlicker now.Yes i am thankful that i don't argue day and night to justify marrying girls under 18 like you.
Also like we discussed in the other thread, don't shit on western culture while you live in the west. Hypocrisy is a big no no in Islam you should know that.
I think i'm beginning to understand where you coming from. You see my friend where there are no 'jma' you find different madhabs with their own ijtihad supported by quran and sunnah. So in this case one might ask what do shafi's thing of this what do hanbalis say about that.Huh? that has nothing to do with what I am saying, Most issues have no Ijmaa', and this entire conversation is not about Ijmaa' its about permissible thigns being not allowed for a greater benefit.
Rulers don't make it up they collect evidence discuss with informed scholars and make their decision based on thatThese sort of stuff i often times think is up to learned men to figurer out not rulers. That being the case you might very well be right about this or know something i'm ignorant of. That's why i ask for a dalil.
We can't just keep arguing about this forever let's just agree to disagree.Rulers don't make it up they collect evidence discuss with informed scholars and make their decision based on that
Very informative jazakallahu khaira.He is talking about the tripple talaq ruling being changed. Its well known. Ibn Taymiyyah was even arrested for disagreeing that a man can divorce his wife three times on the spot. Read up on it.
It was Omar RA that changed it:
Abu Bakr and the first two years of ‘Umar’s caliphate, a threefold divorce was counted as one. Then ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab said: People have become hasty in a matter in which they should take their time. I am thinking of holding them to it. So he made it binding upon them.
@Garaad diinle
Not just that as well
Yasir Qadhi makes a very good point about child marriage. In Islam it is merely allowed and a ruler can disallow it supposedly. Qadhi made logical points and he also talks about numerous cases of the Mubah being temporarily disallowed in Islamic history starting with Umar bin Khattab’s R.A time.
Before all of these people with grade 1 fiqh get upset, why did Umar bin Khattab R.A temporarily disallow marrying Jew and Christian women despite it being explicitly allowed in the Quran? It was a pragmatic decision. He didn’t go against the Quran and Sunnah, he merely limited it as he was worried about the marital status of Muslim women and it was about the greater good of these women not being spinsters. Hence, the Question is why can’t Muslim Ulama in today’s modern world actually take a pragmatic view and actually worry about the health of young Muslim girls?
Some Salafis on here will call Qadhi a progressive, but that doesn’t make sense. If in early Islam, Marrying Jews and Christian women was limited and the permissibility of marrying their women is explicitly mentioned in the Quran, yet child marriage isn’t, why is it okay for one to be limited and not the other? Take for example the issue of triple talaq at one time as well. It is allowed but it has been limited throughout Islamic history.
Looking at Islamic history really does unravel a lot of the talking points of many have here. Anyways, most Muslim countries do have age limits any way.
Yes somalis should apply that and marry outside their race.Not just that as well
Umar Ibn khattab (RA) limited cousin marriage in fact he was pushing the men and the women to marry outside their tribe or race
Never understood why they’re against it (those who are against it )Yes somalis should apply that and marry outside their race.
Lets make a post about it and see how many people in this forum agree with this
that has nothing to do with limiting cousin marriage. just say you want an cadaan girl with your chest.Yes somalis should apply that and marry outside their race.
Lets make a post about it and see how many people in this forum agree with this
You talk to them, they are so interested in race and qabiil and all of that its embarrsiingNever understood why they’re against it (those who are against it )
At the end of the days other tribes and races are the people of allah doesn’t matter if they’re Jew , arab , Nigerian , somali , Spanish etc they believe in allah and that’s all it matters.
Some Somalis themselves hold cultures over deen which is so wrong islam
I don't like cadaan women thanks, Umar ibn khattab didn't discourage just cousin marriages, thats more of a modern day western thing, he encouraged people to marry outside of their tribe and cities, basically diversify who you marry, because different races of people have different strengths, this is even known in animal breeding aswell, point being, if somalis want to just marry inside their qabiil or only somalis they are limiting their diversity in genetics and therefore limiting there strenght.that has nothing to do with limiting cousin marriage. just say you want an cadaan girl with your chest.