So you mean to tell us a Muslim should view a piece of land over ones religion, they should be patriotic but they must refrain from adhering to their faith, a line that was drown on a map & given a fictitious name is more important than God. In a nut shell it's perfectly fine to get killed for disloyalty to ones nation if they're from the Judeo-Christian world but if they're from a Muslim country & they do the same then they're backwards & barbaric, a child can easily figure out your biased malicious views that are slyly intended to smear the religion of Islam, if that wasn't the case then likewise you would pour scorn on Israrl & America, you won't cause you would be arrested for being anti Semitic, you see the double standards? For the record I deem my religion to be more important than Puntland & my mother & father infact my entire family tree.
I didn't say it is perfectly fine to kill treasonous people. I am against the death penalty. What I am saying is, if you would refrain from misrepresenting my views is, comparing a private individual choosing their faith to someone causing harm to other people/their nation is not in any way equal. It is desperate and only serves a supremacist ideology.
Once upon a time the world worked near enough in the way that you imply, because the world was cut up into christendom, the caliphate and whatever else. The world does not work like that now. Apostasy does not equal treason without treason itself being involved. You have to make an argument for that and you haven't because you can't.
I don't care to malign muslims/islam. Those like you, who think people should be killed for choosing their religion are a problem and I will malign you all day, because why not? You are advocating my death and I am hurting your feelings. I couldn't care any less about your feelings sxb. You have to stop thinking I care about your feelings.
Many Muslims, especially today, don't advocate for things that are deplorable like killing people who leave Islam. And it is the Quran that said there is no compulsion in religion, and they take that above any hadith and any scholarly opinion. Which is good of them. And seeing as the Quran is supposed to be the world of Allah, it should reign supreme over the other things.
That doesn't mean I should ignore the opinions of some of the most influential sheikhs of sunni islam and all four schools of thought on the issue. An argument can be made that their rulings made sense in another time, but that doesn't stop lots and lots of Muslims still advocating it. It is my duty to speak out against it. You want me to be some kind of house-slave piece of shit that won't defend themselves against oppression? That's not happening.
If it was the Church of England that was advocating someone who leaves Anglicanism and converts to Islam should be killed, and then pulled their weight to influence courts to this effect, I WOULD BE SAYING THE EXACT SAME THING! Anybody who reads what I have written in my previous statement and this one can see my reasoning and it would apply in this case as well.
The reason why people like you desperately try to make it seems like people who have opinions like me are somehow being unfair to muslims or islam and then add on some totally and completely meaningless stuff like 'my religion is more important to me than puntland' is because keeping the argument straight doesn't serve your interests. The only way you feel comfortable in a conversation like this is if you misrepresent my opinions. Well its not happening. Shame on you and everyone who would agree with that bs.
Don't talk to me about double standards. Double standards is prosletizing on a Thursday and killing murtads on a Friday, that's a double standard. But you won't admit that will you? Or will you?