RACIST BRITISH MAN "WE BUILT AFRICA, YOU DESTROYED IT AND HAVE RETURNED TO BEING POOR AND PRIMITIVE"

[HalimaJ]

there is nothing to predicting u fucking moron
he is to blame him for not initiating the conquest of europe, if he did so the predicted future would be one were europe is under the control of afirca

You are the moron in this situation.


No, you claimed that if Mansa Musa conquered the Europeans his people would be educated and that the Bantus would not be colonised. Arabs did everything you think Musa should have done, yet they are still not as educated and they were still colonised.

There goes your theory out the window.

You are an idiot.

 

[Yaquub]

No, you claimed that if Mansa Musa conquered the Europeans his people would be educated and that the Bantus would not be colonised.

Arabs did everything you think Musa should have done, yet they are still not as educated and they were still colonised.

There goes your theory out the window.

I just explained to you arabs conquered by the mercy of god and the persians were the real brains behind the scenes. Arabs just commanded the army and had no desire to learn science like the keen and eager persian converts. So of course they reverted to their natural lazy state once they lost their colonies and their moral plummeted.

Abu Huraira reported: We were sitting in the company of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) that Sura al-Jumu’a was revealed to him and when he recited (these words):” Others from amongst them who have not yet joined them,” Then a person amongst them (those who were sitting there) said: Allah’s Messenger...! But Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) made no reply, until he questioned him once, twice or thrice. There was amongst us Salman al Farisi (The Persian). The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) placed his hand on Salman and then said: Even if faith were near the Pleiades (The furthest Planet), a man from amongst these (Presians) would surely find it. (Book 031, Number 6178)

 

[CanIDimo]

Yes but when did he use his wealth to build a sustaining empire like europeans today. Why did he not encourage advancement? he didn't even bother to keep to build a lasting kingdom and it showed. Any true general would desire to see his country become a world power and would make sure his children did the same.

Also whites only colonised arabs because they were retarded and betrayed the real soldiers the ottomans. Ottomans were the only ones smart enough to engage whites in an arms race unlike africans in mansa musa's time and were not colonised as a result.

I get your point nothing happened in his time and there was peace but he should and could have prepared his sons to be good vigilante leaders but he failed to do this. Besides it's not white ppl's fault that mansa musa's sons were not able to advance their empire and defend their ppl against the poor whites who decided to educate themselves and invent superior weapons than africans. Which is by the way what mansu musa could have done with his time of peace but for some reason he didn't.

bro, we think alike, great minds think alike
arabs are to blame for the downfall of Ottoman empire
Ottomans are the one muslim group i respect, they are gods among us, longest empire and they would have still ruled the world if it wasn't for arab supremacy that the arabs fostered, which is responsible for the occuption of Palestine

 

[Yaquub]

Arabs unlike white people enslaved all types of different races from whites to mongols to indians.

Racism has always existed, but the preoccupations with race and the widespead view of African inferiority is definatley a modern concept that was not common in the ancient and medieval world.

Please get your facts right. Bilal was cursed for his mother's lineage hinting that being the child of a black woman was looked down upon by the ancient arabs.

 

[Yaquub]

A

bro, we think alike, great minds think alike
arabs are to blame for the downfall of Ottoman empire
Ottomans are the one muslim group i respect, they are gods among us, longest empire and they would have still ruled the world if it wasn't for arab supremacy that the arabs fostered, which is responsible for the occuption of Palestine

Arabs are still childish and became exactly like the jews they curse. They are jealous and want to be the saviours of the world and to be honoured continuously and when the ottomans had more power than them and treated the muslims justly the arabs rebelled and betrayed them.

 

[CanIDimo]

You're illogical. Arabs conquered Eureopeans, yet hundreds of years later they were conquered themselves, by the very people they conquered.

Algerians and Morrocans are descendents of the famous powerful Moors, yet look at what the French did to them.

Why are North Africans not as educated as the Europeans?

Why are North Africans not as educated as the Europeans?

north africans and arabs have also fucked and have not full conquered Europe, no one but u is denying that

 

[HalimaJ]

I just explained to you arabs conquered by the mercy of god and the persians were the real brains behind the scenes. Arabs just commanded the army and had no desire to learn science like the keen and eager persian converts. So of course they reverted to their natural lazy state once they lost their colonies and their moral plummeted.

Abu Huraira reported: We were sitting in the company of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) that Sura al-Jumu’a was revealed to him and when he recited (these words):” Others from amongst them who have not yet joined them,” Then a person amongst them (those who were sitting there) said: Allah’s Messenger...! But Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) made no reply, until he questioned him once, twice or thrice. There was amongst us Salman al Farisi (The Persian). The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) placed his hand on Salman and then said: Even if faith were near the Pleiades (The furthest Planet), a man from amongst these (Presians) would surely find it. (Book 031, Number 6178)

Persian helped, but the Caliphas were Arab, with Salah addin being Kurdish.

The Moors who invaded Europe, were North African and Arab NOT Persian.

 

[CanIDimo]

No, you claimed that if Mansa Musa conquered the Europeans his people would be educated and that the Bantus would not be colonised.

Arabs did everything you think Musa should have done, yet they are still not as educated and they were still colonised.

There goes your theory out the window.

stupid stupid ur stupid for that

arabs have not done it, he have also failed their people.

even the great ottoman empire that have lasted for sooo long and invented soo much weaponary and tech, have not fully made the world feel their presences and made the world proclaim their allegiance to them the way america does today,

usa invades every little hole in the world and makes sure they are no threat and are in accordance to their agenda. THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

 

[HalimaJ]

Why are North Africans not as educated as the Europeans?

north africans and arabs have also fucked and have not full conquered Europe, no one but u is denying that

Ottomans which you have respect for did not fully conquere Europe as well.

So whats your point?

Conquere or be conquered.

Yet history has proved that even if you do conquere, you can still be conquered.

So what is your point?

 

[CanIDimo]

Arabs unlike white people enslaved all types of different races from whites to mongols to indians.

Racism has always existed, but the preoccupations with race and the widespead view of African inferiority is definatley a modern concept that was not common in the ancient and medieval world.

i will tell u think
white have failed to conquer china and bring it to its knees and they will pay a price for this, we are witnessing the consequences of this today, somehow china has managed to go from not being in the top 10 most powerful nation in 1979 with the most population(a con, when ur broke, unused manpower) to being second world superpower today (a pro, when ur powerful, enough manpower to solidify ur place )

America and japan will pay a heavy price for failing to properly pacify china

 

[HalimaJ]

stupid stupid ur stupid for that

arabs have not done it, he have also failed their people.

even the great ottoman empire that have lasted for sooo long and invented soo much weaponary and tech, have not fully made the world feel their presences and made the world proclaim their allegiance to them the way america does today,

usa invades every little hole in the world and makes sure they are no threat and are in accordance to their agenda. THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

You are stupid for thinking that Empires last forever.

USA is in power today
150 years ago, the British were in power
800 years ago, the Arabs were in power
2000 years ago, the Romans were in power.

The Arabs have fell, the Romans have fell, the Mongols have fell, the Persians have fell. What makes you think that the people you admire today will not be read about in history books as nothing but past conquers?

All of these Empires have invaded nearly half of the world or more, yet look at their plight today? The mongols are poor, Arab countries are in dissary and the italians are forgotten Eureopeans that can't compete with the USA.

I wonder how the USA will be like in 200 years.

 

[CanIDimo]

Please get your facts right. Bilal was cursed for his mother's lineage hinting that being the child of a black woman was looked down upon by the ancient arabs.

he was half black half arab, looked something like this yet he was discriminated against like he was blick as f*ck and was 1000% negro

racism was much worse back then, at this point @HalimaJ is saying anything to stick with and support ur with initial arugment, she is stubborn

 

[CanIDimo]

Ottomans which you have respect for did not fully conquere Europe as well.

So whats your point?

Conquere or be conquered.

Yet history has proved that even if you do conquere, you can still be conquered.

So what is your point?

history has proved that even if you do conqueror, you can still be conquered.

i agree with this statement
the problem is mensa musa has not even conquered or set out to conquer Europeans to begin with, and we are saying that u can't respect that and he was an idiot for that.
we would have respected him if he conquered them and was conquered back

 

[CanIDimo]

You are stupid for thinking that Empires last forever.

USA is in power today
150 years ago, the British were in power
800 years ago, the Arabs were in power
2000 years ago, the Romans were in power.

The Arabs have fell, the Romans have fell, the Mongols have fell, the Persians have fell. What makes you think that the people you admire today will not be read about in history books as nothing but past conquers?

All of these Empires have invaded nearly half of the world or more, yet look at their plight today? The mongols are poor, Arab countries are in dissary and the italians are forgotten Eureopeans that can't compete with the USA.

I wonder how the USA will be like in 200 years.

what made ur thick brain think that i am naive enough to believe empires last forever??
it is all about making it last long enough like the ottomans, all those empires u mention have something in common that mali does not
they invaded and conquered other continents

 

[HalimaJ]

history has proved that even if you do conqueror, you can still be conquered.

i agree with this statement
the problem is mensa musa has not even conquered or set out to conquer Europeans to begin with, and we are saying that u can't respect that and he was an idiot for that.
we would have respected him if he conquered them and was conquered back

My point is this, even if he set out to conquer them, 1000 years down the line would the outcome be different?

My guess is no.

Empires rarely last that long.

West africans along with the North would have been colonised. The end.

Winners fast become losers.

I can imagine, nobody during Musa's time period could believe that Northern Europe would be powerful. That's how unpredictable life is.

 

[CanIDimo]

You are stupid for thinking that Empires last forever.

USA is in power today
150 years ago, the British were in power
800 years ago, the Arabs were in power
2000 years ago, the Romans were in power.

The Arabs have fell, the Romans have fell, the Mongols have fell, the Persians have fell. What makes you think that the people you admire today will not be read about in history books as nothing but past conquers?

All of these Empires have invaded nearly half of the world or more, yet look at their plight today? The mongols are poor, Arab countries are in dissary and the italians are forgotten Eureopeans that can't compete with the USA.

I wonder how the USA will be like in 200 years.

only people who have not conquered other races are black people
it is why they are bottom tier today
romans are doing good
even arabs are doing relatively good compared to blacks, even though they developed under the mercy, intelligence,know-how and permission of the Europeans

 

[CanIDimo]

My point is this, even if he set out to conquer them, 1000 years down the line would the outcome be different?

My guess is no.

Empires rarely last that long.

West africans along with the North would have been colonised. The end.

Winners fast become losers.

I can imagine, nobody during Musa's time period could believe that Northern Europe would be powerful. That's how unpredictable life is.

what you are doing it called a straw man fallacy, look it up nayaa
u are bringing up and debunking things we are not even saying

 

[HalimaJ]

what you are doing it called a straw man fallacy, look it up nayaa
u are bringing up and debunking things we are not even saying

Your whole argument was a strawman fallacy to begin with.

You blamed a medieval man from a completley different time period, by suggesting that if he attemped to conquer Europe during the dark ages (basically nearly 1000 years ago) Bantus would not have been colonised.

How retarded is that argument.

He didn't need to, the Moors did, and there ass was colonised 800 years later.

 

[CanIDimo]

Arabs unlike white people enslaved all types of different races from whites to mongols to indians.

Racism has always existed, but the preoccupations with race and the widespead view of African inferiority is definatley a modern concept that was not common in the ancient and medieval world.

another straw man,
our point is that racism was Simply more severe back then, today we live in a human right/politically correct world. united nation has is on ur side and has ur back if u r discriminated against.

people of different race also didn't procreate much or interact on the level they do today so race relations was bleak,

 

[HalimaJ]

another straw man,
our point is that racism was Simply more severe back then, today we live in a human right/politically correct world. united nation has is on ur side and has ur back if u discriminated against.

people of different race also didn't procreate much or interact on the level they do today so race relations was bleak,

By modern i'm talking about modern history. 17th century to the mid 20th century.

NOT the 21st century obviously.