these dudes doing shirk with the way they’re expecting us to put complete faith in other regular humans. At the end of the day, they don’t have any other special knowledge. They provide their interpretation of the quran and sunnah from their continuous studies which I respect but that doesn’t mean I have to trust them or anything. There are millions of scholars all with slightly different interpretations.
Imagine doing takfir on someone else for calling a muslim scholar an “egyptian man”. Borderline shirk if you ask me.
What does being born in the 1800s do with it. Your basing his creditability off a date/time. So by inference, your claiming the hadith is false, cause he was "born in the 100s"
Nobody is doing takfir, its just a continuous pattern of discrediting scholars, thread after thread and claiming hadiths are false. The term "Egyptian man" ain't offensive, but the meaning behind it is. Its like me not referencing your name, but say "The Somali born in the early 2000s is unreliable"
calling someone out for takfir then doing it in the next literal sentence, are you okay? Nope the scholars are not "us". The people of knowledge are on a higher level than us this is basic islamic aqeedah. This is why people take matters of dispute to the scholars because they spend their entire lives studying. Are they infallible ? Nope nobody said they were. But they certaintly arent your average laymen
What capabilities do scholars have that every other human doesn't? Absolutely nothing. They're the same as us
I didn’t do takfir, I said it’s borderline shirk and not actual shirk. I was also exaggerating to show how preposterous it is.
They dont have special capabilities they just dedicate their lives to learning this Religion. Why are you trying to undermine the ulamah when you have no credentials your quite frankly a nobody, your agenda is clear as day tho
It’s ironic! Whats concealed is worse than what’s out in the open! Concealment is a festering wound. I think rather than Islamic it’s more somalic. Somali ppl love to sweep things under the rag.
I disagree, but lemme first clarify those Pakistani girls I was referring to do cover their hair for prayer. And they do dress modest except they just don’t cover their hair(there’s an ongoing debate if hair covering is even Islamic). I disagree that they’re both partially transgressing. Covering your hair isn’t part of the 5 pillars of Islam, praying and fasting is. The Pakistani girl that’s praying, fasting is more of a Muslim than big ole jilbabi xalimo that does none or partially. If anything wearing a hijab while not practicing is akin to munafiq as your external and internal conflict.
Being free and liberated is cool in white country you say but not at home like that’s something to be proud of! Lol when did Islam become a religion of unfreedom and subjugation? Lol do you even hear yourself? Lol
if you don’t know anything about the religion than ask your father, if his not edecuated enough than go to a well known sheik and i’m sure he’ll answer your questions more clearly than any on here.
liberation and freedom means to go outside with ur nipples showing now a days. xalimos r truly lost may Allah guide them.
Notice i put it in quotation marks to highlight something. Maybe like sarcasm. Your being deliberately obtuse, cloak is something that covers the whole body, like a jibab. Semantics when it comes to the word of Allah is not something to do lightly. Check 33:59. The word cloak is interchangeable to covering with outer garments the whole body
The way you weirdos interpret Quran verses and base credibility on Hadiths on if you agree with it or not.
Yes im a weirdo for not taking my intepretations from a hadith denying no qualification having person like you
They can have all the qualifications in the world but at the end of the day they're still a human just like the rest of us. Allah did not send these people down and did not tell us to listen to them as if they're a prophet
What are you talking about? I’m utterly confused. I don’t care if your quotation mark meant sarcasm or not dude. Also not semantics, I said cloak, jilbab, hijab are not mentioned in the Quran.... and that hair covering isn’t specified. It’s whatever, this argument is neither here or there.
Nobody treats them like prophets and Nobody said they're infallible, stop with the strawman arguments.
Sorry you can't read between the lines and yes the outer body garments or jilbab or veil is mentioned. Sorry if that bothers you
