Except today alot of these gabasars and scarves are no longer seen as adequate. Men's attire remain unchanged but women’s has drastically since the 80s in Somalia. Now wearing this huge tent is the norm and expected. Apparently can’t even wear direc outside these days which was perfectly normal before the war.
How are they wearing it on their own accord if showing few strands of hair in xamar causes so much harassment on the streets? If Somali women had true autonomy you’d see a variation of styles like you’d see normally among other societies. The simple fact that most are wearing jilbabs and even few loose strand of hair causes this kinda backlash tells us otherwise.I do believe Somali women are being oppressed in Somalia.
However, I do not think the simple act of wearing a niqab and hijaab counts as 'oppression'. It's mostly worn my Somali women on their own accord.
If you really cared about Somali women back home, you would actively call out excessive sexual violence being perpetuated against them. You would also call out the forced marriages women have to attend due to being r*ped by their perpetuators.
There are sooo many other pressing issues you can advocate for, yet you choose to complain about the modest act of wearing the Niqaab and Abaayah. Talk about misplaced priorities.
if you’re not gonna answer her question then stfu. Seems like you don’t know either and just want to hide your ignorance.
Some men are apparently aroused by the mystique of the veiled figure. But that’s exactly my point...the society became more conservative only when it comes to the women. There’s no difference for Somali men before and after the war.
What I always had problem with is how most Somalis obsess more over the hijab then even the salaat and even fasting. You’ll meet full blown xalimo hijabi that doesn’t even pray and then you meet a Pakistan girl wearing jeans and tunic no hijab that prays not only the obligatory 5 prayers but also multiple sunnah prayers. I’ve met plenty of both irl! Dressing modesty is required but it’s way below more important things like praying. And the jilbab is not Islamic. Idk who created it but Islam did not prescribe certain style for women. The Quran doesn’t even mention covering hair directly, it’s say cover your bosom(verse 24:31)regardless this unhealthy obsession with hijab and women’s modesty above all else is odd and demented.
Well some scholars argue that societal hypocrisy where these full blown hijabis commit sins is better than them being more naked. When sins are flaunted in the open can set a dangerous precedent. They argue that society would be more preserved this way despite the irony of it.
(FYI : I get the point, before someone states it ain't the point your trying to put across)
"The Uzbek", "The Egyptian Man" , what is with closeted gaalos/Quranists who disrupt the sunnah and their continuous defamation of Scholars and shiekhs.Authentic according to an Egyptian man born in the late 1800s
I didn't know trusting a "scholar" was a pillar in Islam but hey
Your irrelevant anecdotes mean nothing since 9/10 the one wearing a jilbab prays and the one wearings jeans doesnt. Not allowing women walk around without hijab is not an obession, i dont know if you heard but somalia is a conservative muslim nation. the vast majority are not sufi cucks. Its cool to be all "free and liberated" in the white country you live in but dont be suprised if that stuff doesnt fly back home.
Defamation of one ain't it, nor is it a pillar of Islam nor is it a part of Islam. Talking ill of the dead, talking ill of a scholar, talking ill of the deen which you claim to be a part of, your chargesheet just gets longer and longer.
Where did I say anything bad about him? I said he was born in the 1800s so I don't find him credible.
