Sure but just wanted highlight the difference between that and a woman in her traditional setting where such inadequacy would not really be present. Take nomadic Somali women. They were every bit as important to the family's survival as the man and had daily tasks and responsibilities. Making the tent by gathering all the materials and fashioning them together like the poles, ropes and mats. Tending the sheep and goats who were the most numerous livestock historically and the main source of meat, preparing all the crucial dairy products like ghee and sour-milks, preparing all the meals, protecting and doing much of the emotional parenting for the kids alongside many other duties. These women would have never felt useless. The man likewise was responsible for defending the entire family from raids, for conducting raids of his own if needed, for tending to the larger animals like the camels and horses, for teaching the sons their future responsibilities, for being the family's representative in matters of trade and legality and so forth. There was a harmony, no one was truly more important than the other or could truly talk down to the other like what they did wasn't of absolutely crucial value.
This is the natural state of women in hunter-gatherer, pastoralist and farmer settings, as a man's partner in daily survival. This is what they mentally evolved in. Taking that being and expecting them to be happy as some well-off housewife is bound to cause mental distress in my opinion.