If this is true Mr.Cheese has some explaining to do.

Are you trying to rewrite history that some of us are old enough to remember?
Source: Culture and Customs of Somalia
Innocent Maay communities, who fled to the safety of USC controlled areas, recounting the horror Morgan & Siad militias unleashed on them.
Did you even read your resource?
Can you paraphrase what it says? I would like to test your comprehension.
Also a quick google search and I found out the author of that text is originally a journalist and now a professor of linguistics rather than a historian.
I also found this book review from an accomplished historian that tore him and his book a new asshole. It would seem like every chapter has serious problems with it, even the one that touches on linguistics.
I pasted some excerpts from it here. It shows the strong bias of the other, and his dishonesty.
However, no format can excuse the shortcomings of the author's treatment of Somali political history in the introductory chapter. Absent here is the generous and inclusive spirit of the cultural chapters, which, while uneven, treat with respect the old and new, urban and rural, male and female, northern and southern aspects of Somali society. (One almost wonders whether this chapter and the "Chronology" preceding it were even written by the same author!) Instead the reader is presented with a teleological account in which northerners (the inhabitants of what is now the breakaway republic of Somaliland) are portrayed only as victims of the military Barre government in which they, in reality, consistently held central portfolios. In order to present northerners moreover as the only victims of the Barre regime, the author must ignore earlier mass brutalizations. To present them as the most important resisters of the Barre regime, he must downplay and misrepresent the earlier armed resistance front, that had already made considerable territorial gains on the Barre regime while the northern Somali National Movement was still in formation.
While the author is fully entitled to his opinions and his support for the breakaway republic of the north, in a general study of this kind he should at least note that such a denial of northern joint responsibility for all aspects of what happened in Somalia during the Barre regime is an extremely partisan position. This strong bias colors the whole introductory chapter, from the description of geography and Somali origins-where are Christopher Ehret and Mohamed Nuuh Ali in this context?-to colonial resistance, the origins of the nationalist movement, and the bloodletting in Mogadishu in 1991, which skips over the attempted ethnocide committed by USC militias (see pp. 25, 39-40). It is a pity that the series editor did not catch the highly politicized and biased nature of this historical overview, for one must assume that this series was created to turn the general reader's attention away from the divisiveness of politics toward the unifying potential and power of culture.
@Bahal @Thegoodshepherd @Abdalla Check this out guys.

I debunked his 'resource', copy pasta this if he shares this 'resource' again.
EDIT: Forgot to add the sauce.

It is downloadable and is only 4 pages long.
https://www.academia.edu/18304041/R...m_of_Somalia_by_Mohamed_Diriye_Abdullahi_2001