What? none of this makes sense.
1. "
docent mean their different ethnically then their bantu brothers"
I warned you to go brush up on your facts. Bantu isn't an ethnic group. Bantus live in Congo to South Africa. The Hausa are an ethnic group, sorry.
2. "
if your going to bring up the whole continent of Europe in Rome empire and they're advancements then you should be pro afrocentrism for a few centuries"
Lol wtf?? Looks like you didn't read what I wrote earlier, I'm not a Afro-centrist.
I REPEAT, I''M NOT A AFRO-CENTRIST.
How can I wait a few centuries?? Time doesn't work like that.
I see your dancing around the main question:
"If a divided Somali has always been what's worked best for Somalia, then show me the fruits of centuries of small kingdoms." Answer or bye-bye!
3."
worthless "advancements" Worthless??

How are inventions like paper and gunpowder "worthless"? Medicine, aqueducts, and philosophy waa iska useless huh? It's not my fault Somali kingdoms haven't done shit in progressing humanity.
4. "
we are too only difference is our tribes are literally warring"
So the Hausa and Igbo are "brothers" because their both Bantu. But oh no "Somalis are like, totally different, cause we like, fight each other and stuff."
@Life @Timo Madow and proud or
@Dalmoor come argue with me.
You have disappointed me with your cyclical arguments. One more chance. I need to take my blood pressure pills...oh wait, medicine is uSELESS