There is no curvature on that video bro, the camera is wobbly and not stable.
Again address the picture above stop dancing around please.
@Inquisitive_ sxb waxaan ila arag bal.
@kaluumayste
These guys don't really know anything about fish eye or wide eye lens or what the differences even are, the fish eye lens is used due to a concave representation it gives to an image (capturing more detail) were as the wide-eye lens is the normal non manipulated lens e.g. what your eyes see.
An example best illustrates their stupidity, here you have famous red bull jump, on the left Fish eye lens (giving a concave representation) but on the inside he has wide eye lens (or called wide-angle)
The area your looking at on the whole left is NEW MEXICO desert, who wants to argue that NEW MEXICO makes almost 1/3 of the EARTH ???? what a fucking small earth we live on IF YOU ACTUALLY believe the image on the left is the ball planet whom you can almost see half of it in such a low altitude.
![]()
@kaluumayste
These guys don't really know anything about fish eye or wide eye lens or what the differences even are, the fish eye lens is used due to a concave representation it gives to an image (capturing more detail) were as the wide-eye lens is the normal non manipulated lens e.g. what your eyes see.
An example best illustrates their stupidity, here you have famous red bull jump, on the left Fish eye lens (giving a concave representation) but on the inside he has wide eye lens (or called wide-angle)
The area your looking at on the whole left is NEW MEXICO desert, who wants to argue that NEW MEXICO makes almost 1/3 of the EARTH ???? what a fucking small earth we live on IF YOU ACTUALLY believe the image on the left is the ball planet whom you can almost see half of it in such a low altitude, much lower then high altitude balloon shots posted on the first page!!!
This is enough to debunk the entire arguments the quakademics brought forth.
![]()
@Inquisitive_ @kaluumayste
What would they gain from telling you it's a spherical Earth?
Who really gives a shit?
What difference would it make if the Earth was flat?
Are you seriously asking those questions![]()
You tell me. I'm not the one who's making it my life mission to paint something fake as the truth.![]()
What am i painting that is fake here ?
The Horizon always rises to your eye level, impossible on a spinning ball planet
![]()
Simple trigonometry chart based on the 25000 mile circumference and the levels of curvature seen relative to distance! You learn this at fucking any decent college you gone to if you took a maths course, this alone converted the fast majority of the people to the movement, the horizon will NEVER EVER be eye level to the observer as you go up/.
![]()
@Inquisitive_ @kaluumayste
What would they gain from telling you it's a spherical Earth?
Who really gives a shit?
What difference would it make if the Earth was flat?
Flat Earth
@MadNomad
I made a comment under that video when he posted it the other day! I had a feeling you would bring this up! the top comment as well as the second top comment debunks the whole thing as well many more anomalies, if you had any brains you would know this.
I am referring to the first video, I really laughed the first time I looked at it, I know it's easy to deceive you in general seeing the kind of image you posted regarding the up-side-down moon in the norther/southern hemisphere.
As ridiculous as that was to me it was a 100 times more plausible then this drone video you posted, like I said earlier, once your in that paradigm you become a lost cause
This tired old claim again. No, the horizon does not rise up to your eye level. It does drop.
This guy did an experiment in which he filmed a sunset, and after the sun had set at sea level, he immediately elevated the drone up to 1000 ft. And Lord and behold, the sun suddenly came back into view and set for a second time. Impossible on a flat earth, proving the curvature of the earth.
In part 2 he demonstrates with clear proof that the horizon does dip upon elevation.
Now i know this clear proof won't convince you. And frankly i don't give a damn. Stay in your delusions.
Now i'm done. Sayonara.
You flat earthers are using images (quite unsuccessfully) to prove things in a realm where things are ultimately proven through mathematics.
@Burhan enlighten your brothers. We can't be having these people embarrass themselves with the views they hold in public.