Did the Books written by Jews that were later burned contain Jewish/Hebrew racial supremacy propaganda?You should probably read about what the Jewish intelligentsia was up to in the interwar period, and their doings in the very progressive Weimar Republic. You should probably also look up what sort of books written by those aforementioned Jewish scientists wrote, that were later burned by the völkisch student league. Also read about the German civil war of 1918, and who exactly were the leaders. You probably should also read about the Juden Bund, Mensheviks and so on who supported the November(and infamous October) Revolution.
Quite sad people don’t know what exactly made the Germans of that time dislike the Jews in Germany, and I haven’t even mentioned how Hasidic/Haredim dynasties work.
Did the Books written by Jews that were later burned contain Jewish racial supremacy propaganda?
Absolute filthNo, the overwhelming majority of the books burned were either Marxist works, ography or the books of the so-called “Institute of Sexology” created by Magnus Hirschfeld, am influential force working for “the understanding” and legalization of homophilia, abortion, transsexuals, paedophilia and all manner of sexual perversion. Don’t look up the type of study they did there, it’s very gross but to give you an idea they very frequently experimented on children.
Other things burned were material considered relict of the decadence and degeneracy of the previous years of the Weimar Republic. After reading about this a bit I’m inclined to agree. You have to understand that the current state of the West is actually just an internationalist Weimar Republic. They didn’t burn Jewish racial supremacy propaganda, because there weren’t much of that, but they did burn most of the work of Jewish authors, like Magnus Hirschfeld.
Universites in scandenevia is FreeFor university, at least in Europe you need to take one in order to attend- roughly 9k euros or £9.25 in the UK. Unless their parents have a stash of money kept somewhere or you have a rich relative who's willing to pay for your tuition fees. This is the debt I'm talking about, not bank or loan shark money.
spot on as usual.As another person mentioned, integration is a two-way street. Denmark and its populist parties cannot simply wag a sanctimonious finger in the face of immigrants, especially Somalis, demanding integration while ignoring the employment discrimination, inadequate schooling, and social discrimination which hampers integration. Does their party platform even mention this?
Somalis, on the other hand, are probably the worst immigrant group in Europe. Too much (superficial) religion, shameless misuse of public resources, poor work ethic, lack of family planning and out of control children---Somalis are very soon going to be reviled as much as Roma Gypsies if this does not change. But sadly, this ethnic group lacks the ability or willingness/capacity to self-criticize itself and then make changes for the better (like the Chinese and Japanese are able to do, and so many other ethnic groups that rose from backwardness to modernity).All they do is proclaim Dhaqankeena Suuban and booty-shake for a failed and backward cultural system, or wallow in self-righteous indignation, blaming all their problems on gaalo while letting their own errors go unacknowledged.
Somalis lack the intelligentsia necessary to brutally critique them, and what few Somali intellectuals there are, they do not have an audience as Somalis do not have a large, middle-class group of literates. 95% of Somalis in the West who immigrated have not read a book in the past year or tbh the pat decade, a large number cannot read or write in any meaningful way, they work menial jobs and have a difficult, I-am-right-you-are-wrong attitude. It's not a culture that values education or educated people, to the extent that successful groups like Nigerians do.
I personally think Somalis do need to face stronger pressure to integrate---they are the poster child for why multiculturalism is a failed policy---so it will be interesting to see how the Denmark policy works out. Forced integration, and banning chain migration will be important first steps.
Then don’t move to a kafir countyCultural assimilation into a Kufr society is in direct conflict with Islamic teachings
This seems like a religiously-motivated smear of Jews, being that a skim-through of the link you provided and the contents of your post are world’s apart.No, the overwhelming majority of the books burned were either Marxist works, ography or the books of the so-called “Institute of Sexology” created by Magnus Hirschfeld, am influential force working for “the understanding” and legalization of homophilia, abortion, transsexuals, paedophilia and all manner of sexual perversion. Don’t look up the type of study they did there, it’s very gross but to give you an idea they very frequently experimented on children.
Other things burned were material considered relict of the decadence and degeneracy of the previous years of the Weimar Republic. After reading about this a bit I’m inclined to agree. You have to understand that the current state of the West is actually just an internationalist Weimar Republic. They didn’t burn Jewish racial supremacy propaganda, because there weren’t much of that, but they did burn most of the work of Jewish authors, like Magnus Hirschfeld.
The Weimar Republic was also the birthplace of the infamous “Frankfurt school” that’s been the target of many conspiracy theories or as it was called then, “the institute for social research”
You can read the Wikipedia article of the culture of the Weimar Republic and try to read in between the lines.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_culture
This seems like a religiously-motivated smear of Jews, being that a skim-through of the link you provided and the contents of your post are world’s apart.
One read social sciences, engineering feats, physics, and art forms, and the general state of ppl post war, and the other read transsexual, pedophiles and sexology. You tell me who’s biased.“My link” you mean the Wikipedia article of the culture of the Weimar Republic? I’m pretty sure it mentions the institute of sexology, the degeneracy of 1920s Berlin and the Weimar Republic at large, the influence of Jewish intelligentsia etc. But you’re gonna have to click more links and do more of a skim then get back to me to what precisely you think I’m lying about.
One read social sciences, engineering feats, physics, and art forms, and the general state of ppl post war, and the other read transsexual, pedophiles and sexology. You tell me who’s biased.
One read social sciences, engineering feats, physics, and art forms, and the general state of ppl post war, and the other read transsexual, pedophiles and sexology. You tell me who’s biased.
@MusIbr
Your narrative is line with religiously or racially motivated antisemites, who even today, when a Jew or a few are involved in anything beyond their sensibilities (this could range in anything from Hollywood to economic policy to scientific research) believe Jews are to blame for social and economic realities even if non-Jews make up the majority in that engagement.
Sexology is a buzzword. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with researching sex, like anything else. What I was pointing out, was your incredible ability to overlook the bulk of the article you listed yourself, which was innocuous in describing German life post WWI and rife with objectively positive Jewish bigweights (scientists). Yet, you somehow turned a complex landscape into being all about the sexologist Jew.
Even if we’d like to condemn Hirschfeld (I don’t), and even if I don’t want to support those beyond him who engaged in nefarious child research (I don’t), at the same time, it’s undeniable that the German majority was engaged, and yet somehow it was the Jew who was to blame. Take his subjects; all adults, all German, all consenting. But that is the function of propaganda, Nazi propaganda nothwithstanding.
Meanwhile, the Germans themselves from the Nazi era, having no moral leg to stand on, are also responsible for research that is unethical to replicate to today’s standards (yet has proven useful for some disciplines), and yet no there’s no mention from you of that either.
Ironically, what the Germans lost in persecuting Jews, we (the US) gained in the subsequent fleeing of German and other European Jews the likes of Jon von Neumann, Albert Einstein, and countless others fleeing German brutality to line US history books. I guess one can hope burning down sex research of consenting German adults was worth the loss and the horror inflicted.
All you’ve done is underline everything I’ve said as truthful observation. With any luck, the Jews also cause you fitful sleeps. Quick! Throw them money so they disappearI think you’re suffering from a sort of cognitive dissonance whereupon the Jewish contributions in the physical sciences are apparent and readily obvious, where Jews are effortlessly assigned credit, but when their contributions to the social sciences are invoked then they are not the prime movers even though that’s equally apparent. I think we can agree that if it’s not antisemitic to discuss one, it cannot be antisemitic to discuss the other. Isn’t it funny how we all know about Einstein, but very few know about Hirschfeld or the Frankfurt School, even though their contribution is massive to the culture of today?
My motivations for speaking about this doesn't truly matter either, only if I’m correct or not. Also even if we disregard the institute for sexology, which I really don’t think is a small matter considering how inundated we are with things that concern precisely the type of research that was going on in inter-war Germany, which is no coincidence either. The intellectual work started by German Jews was continued by both French, English and American Jews in the post-war period. The papers contained in that institute were the bulk of the papers burned in the infamous Nazi book burnings.
The Germans elected the Nazis precisely because they didn’t like the way Germany was going socially, they didn’t like the museum of Sex, they didn’t like Marxist theory in both the cultural and economic realm, they didn’t like degeneracy. The National Socialist or Völkisch movement was counter-culture to the disgusting and pervasive Jewish intellectualism of the time and I do think we’re due a repeat in the West, the signs are there, and that’s why it’s important to understand it. The West essentially committed the same mistake as Germany after the First World War.
So understanding why exactly the Nazi government disliked Jews is of great importance to us today, especially us Muslims, because many of us struggle with understanding the social climate of the West and how it came to be. Many of us make the mistake that technological progress in the West had gone hand in hand with the West’s dislike for tradition, authority both within and outside of the family, the so-called sexual liberation, perverse sexual inclinations, social egalitarianism; but then I tell them that it was a process that started in Weimar Germany and only really caught up in the rest of the West in the sixties and the events of WWII start making sense to them. If you understand it like the National Socialists did, then you can resist it.
You like the culture of the West so of course you don’t care to blame anyone for it, but many internal and external forces don’t like it and so seek to understand it to counter-act it, and so naturally blame the Jews both of that time and those who carry on in the tradition of Hirschfeld, Freud, Moll, Marx, Bronstein, Horkheimer and so on.