I won’t even deny the US health care system is fuxked. Americans shouldn’t defend it.
@Teeri-Alpha
You sound like Alexis de Tockville on his essays on individualism & can it be adoptable and be realistic? Can you apply your newly founded individualism to yourself and cease being a spokesperson for your clan here for a month? What should the State do to families who can’t feed and look after themselves? Watch them perish with hunger and diseases? Sxb, waa ku sidee?
@Teeri-Alpha you have educated me saaxib, but i have a hard time believing, that a market with no regulation would benefit everyone, especially with no welfare state or anything like it. I feel like it would create a spiral of poverty for the same people, while the rich would be sending their kids to the best school, im not advocating communism, but i dont like the huge wealth inequality. There has to be some sort of support or service for people to get their basic need to be able to reach their full potential, it doesnt matter to me that some people would abuse it, as long as people with not a lot have the recources to pursue their career, not only people that were lucky to be born in a wealthy family
i think you replied to the wrong nigga saaxibconsumers regulate the market, if they cheat, you can go to competitors, ask those caught selling fake meat or this or that,
ask Nokia, once ruled and owned 93% of the world market, ask IBM, they invented the computer, ask retail giants that existed 150 years before amazon, ebay,
ask major airlines, the forgot to innovate, ask taxi drivers uber cleaned out, the abused consumers with higher prices, so they died,
you have no idea who much firms fear your wallet and its right to vote/veto any product,
if firms were never harmed by free market, no firm would go bankrupt and every firm would sell 100% of products they launched, how many products have failed,
did you know Microsoft created the first iPad in early 2000s spent half a billion yet failed,
the rich Australian owner of newscopr/sky bought Myspace for $15 billion yet he failed, he sold my space for 35 million afterwards,
firms dont have a right to exist and consumers dictate, this is why firms hate the free market and demand state protection bro,
firms fear the free market as it gives consumers choice bro,
@Teeri-Alpha
Now, will people be forced to become charitable (like zakat)? Sxb, in one point, you defend the selfish individualist and in another, a communitarian who is propagating on the good for the community like those taught in Islam. I told you that you are mixing different principles that totally are different and contradict.
I gave up.
i think you replied to the wrong nigga saaxib
@Teeri-Alpha you have educated me saaxib, but i have a hard time believing, that a market with no regulation would benefit everyone, especially with no welfare state or anything like it. I feel like it would create a spiral of poverty for the same people, while the rich would be sending their kids to the best school, im not advocating communism, but i dont like the huge wealth inequality. There has to be some sort of support or service for people to get their basic need to be able to reach their full potential, it doesnt matter to me that some people would abuse it, as long as people with not a lot have the recources to pursue their career, not only people that were lucky to be born in a wealthy family
Im not talking about the firms or patents. But the abiltiy for everyone to prosper in such a society.no, i replied you bro,
Ofc not everyone can prosper, but a socetiy where porr people have the recources to prospor, and not only richIm not talking about the firms or patents. But the abiltiy for everyone to prosper in such a society.
There's difference between personal property and private,one last question Dr @Teeri-Alpha
No intellectual property, patents should be available to all. If Tesla invents a vehicle that uses water to power it’s engines, they should make their technology available to everyone including foreign companies. That’s your free-market. Gartay.
What about other properties? Should I share my physical properties, home & office with others and how are they different than my intellectual properties that I spent money and time to invent and produce it?
who will fund research and development?
There's difference between personal property and private,
As teeri said there has to be some competition, especially for thing that are necessary, lets say someone discovers a cure to cancer with a single potion you drink, and he was the only one that could produce and sell that, imagine the priceone last question Dr @Teeri-Alpha
No intellectual property, patents should be available to all. If Tesla invents a vehicle that uses water to power it’s engines, they should make their technology available to everyone including foreign companies. That’s your free-market. Gartay.
What about other properties? Should I share my physical properties, home & office with others and how are they different than my intellectual properties that I spent money and time to invent and produce it?
who will fund research and development?
Private property is not your house but a capital, could be a store barber whatever something you generate revenue. Personal property is your own house or car.
I dont really understand, so do you believe in intellectual property? and patents or where you just playing devils advocate?@Dhallin
This argument started with @Teeri-Alpha declaring war on governments subsidising health care and arguing that they leave it to the “Free market” and here is anti-free market advocating against intellectual properties for the common good of the public. He’s an anarcho-capitalist & not a free marketeer.
Private property is not your house but a capital, could be a store barber whatever something you generate revenue. Personal property is your own house or car.