I guess you can argue I was not super clear on the first part, I did mention UN and EU as well but that is the only valid point you brought.
Somaliland is recognized as a de facto state, which makes it relevant meaning they have statehood not necessarily by legal right. That is what I meant by the Somaliland state is considered "illegal" in the eyes of the international community. Kinda straightforward..
Look at ALL my previous post and tell me exactly where I wrote that
word for word? You either missed that, altered or fabricated that quote to prove your own point.
View attachment 36830
You wrote that quote yourself and pretending it was my words and have the nerve to comment on my english? You can quote me but for the love of God don't change my sentence.
@draco malfoy look at this, these haters lose an argument and start fabricating shit to prove their own point. This is a new low..


I'm not the one on the losing end of an argument that needs to call in his uqdad ridden friend to defend him bc his back is up against the wall.
I'm also not the one that conceded.
I guess you can argue I was not super clear on the first part, I did mention UN and EU as well but that is the only valid point you brought
You are clearly lost and don't know what you're talking about. Bc your dumbass keeps misusing the the word "statehood".
Somaliland is recognized as a de facto state, which makes it relevant meaning they have statehood not necessarily by legal right.
Somaliland doesn't have "
statehood" you fucking dimwit. I already gave your dumbass the definition of Statehood
The status of being a "RECOGNIZED INDEPENDENT NATION".
Somaliland isn't a recognized independent nation. so saying this
they have statehood not necessarily by legal right.
Is simply stupid use of the English language and doesn't make any sense and is also plain wrong. THEY DON'T HAVE STATEHOOD for f*ck sake, so they can't have illegal or legal statehood (which doesn't make sense). saying legal statehood and illegal statehood doesn't form a coherent sentence in the English language in this context, that's something you made up.
Wallahi it's like arguing with a rock, how thick in the head you are
You wrote that quote yourself and pretending it was my words and have the nerve to comment on my english? You can quote me but for the love of God don't change my sentence.
Xoolo, fucking Xoolo
Maybe you should follow your own advice and read the whole post before commenting yourself.
Where the f*ck did I say those were your words. As a matter of fact I specifically said I'm going to edit your quote by switching the word "statehood" with it's definition as to help you see the absurdity of the statement
Let me just re-quote you and use the definition of statehood instead of the word itself, to show you how absurd that statement sounds.
From the first time you decided to reply to me with your shitty input all the way to now, you haven't made a single accurate criticism of anything I said. You made 4 BS claims which you've taken your fault in 1, and the other 3 being that I miss quoted you, (which wasn't true), that I contradicted myself (which I haven't), and Finally that I misused or misunderstood the definition of "statehood" (which I also haven't), but instead you're the one that misunderstood and and misused it.
You are a fool who argues in circles and repeats the same mistakes over and over and over, and I'm quite frankly tired of explaining to your ass how language works and why "illegal and legal statehood" doesn't make any fucking sense. So adios my uqdad ridden typical lander.