Black Tunisians forced to bury their dead in “slave graveyards”
- Thread starter NA9
- Start date
- Status
somalis would be terrible slaves....they knew it wasnt worth it. First of all we are not built to carry heavy load constantly, secondly we are headache to deal with and rebels by nature. You would spend most of your days chasing runaway somalis. Its like employing a gypsie and expect him to turn up to work everyday.....you know its a losing battle
Kratos
Sonder
I know you don't believe it but there is significant historical, archaeological and anecdotal evidence to back up my claim. Don't worry, I will do a DNA test soon and post it here.You have no arab ancestor, doqonyahow is nacay
Muji
VIP
Just kidding hehehehehe
SOMALI GENERAL
VIP
You're the one that lacks knowledge. Religion didn't "save" us, historically Somalis would've never accepted being slaves to any foreigner & they would always fight to the death rather than live a life in bondage. Yes we were technologically inferior to many ajnabis, but so were the arabs since they got their sophisticated weapons from the ottomans etc.
Same reason goes for the North Africans, such as the Sahrawis & Tuaregs as to why they weren't enslaved, but west africans were enslaved by the Europeans....they would make terrible slaves & they'd never accept a life in bondage.
Ape
Study Sunt Tzu’s, ‘Art of War’.
Its because we aren’t physically strong like the bantus. The natives of america were not enslaved for long since they died easier, madows have more endurable and stronger bodies, so it wasnt worth it
SOMALI GENERAL
VIP
The alchemist
VIP
Actually that is incorrect. The majority of the west-central african slaves where muslims. And before islam, of all the east africans, the habeshas were a known slave commodity, somalis were not among those slaves. You could argue and say that the habeshas enslaved themselves too, but that's another story. So we wuz not slaves before and after islam, You argue that without islam in the equation, we would have been vulnerable to slavers because of our lack of strength? Isn't that for every weak ancient nation? I mean the greeks and romans used to enslave other white people. So by saying we could have been enslaved, does not mean that we are equal to the bantus of some sort. And we had the leverage of being good merchants, so the romans and the arabs both benefited from the exchange. You don't enslave people you see as equals, or at very least respect in some sense
Last edited:
Not really. The Arabs avoided the Maasai warriors too who to this day follow their traditional beliefs.
AarHawd_7
North-West, London
Wallahi this is the most scandalous post in sspot history. I’m 100% sure now this dude has a siiil
SOMALI GENERAL
VIP
It's shocking wallah, it puzzles me why certain Somalis suffer from extreme low self-esteem & lack pride in their identity.
The real reason we weren't enslaved is because we were known to the ancient world as far as the Greeks who called us macrobians and respected and also we participated with trade with these nations Arabs knew us as black berbers so we were known and respected and also we were feard no one conquered us habeshas Romans Arabs
Madows were enslaved because they were unknown thous no one cared about them
2 they were not economic trade partners so they were useless Somalia were usefull as trading partners and therfore respected as human beings
3 they were weak had no weapons no weapons nothing Somalia had weapons and could manufactur them
We were a superior race becous we are north Africans geneticly so part Caucasian
Madows were enslaved because they were unknown thous no one cared about them
2 they were not economic trade partners so they were useless Somalia were usefull as trading partners and therfore respected as human beings
3 they were weak had no weapons no weapons nothing Somalia had weapons and could manufactur them
We were a superior race becous we are north Africans geneticly so part Caucasian
Last edited:
I met many Tunisians in Italy and they were some of the most hospitable people you could meet.
Also I've lived in Egypt for a few months and they welcomed Somalis as their Arab brothers.
You people with a delusional hatred for Arabs have never met one nor been to their countries before.
Also I've lived in Egypt for a few months and they welcomed Somalis as their Arab brothers.
You people with a delusional hatred for Arabs have never met one nor been to their countries before.
This guy thinks he's enlightened when he's just a self hater who adopted a different identity (Madow/African American) and looks down upon his people. Disgraceful.
Wallahi those are the facts lol. Where did you get the weapons you used to defend yourselves 100 years ago? I'll wait
The alchemist
VIP
Just like today, even though saudi-arabia have the means to produce weapons and aircrafts it is easier for them to import, so they made connections with western countries through various interest. We had weapons we bought, and that is how an economy works. No one really makes their own weapons, you import them from a good producer with a good brand. Your argument is proving this 68 iq notion. And why are you trying so hard to downplay your own peoples history you toxic c*nt
Madows did have stiks and pikes as weapons, they could not manufacture good quality weapons. Our ancestors were among the people's who built brone age weapons and used them in North Africa as part of the bronze age Madows also could not trade for weapons Somalis could as we had a large trade network thats what made us dangerous
I don't know about your useless tribe, but the Dhulbahante nation in the 19th century fought on horseback with 2 spears and a shield, here is Speke; an English explorer in 1855 describing my tribe:
"The other people I met here were some Dulbahantas arming for the fight. They said they were 4000 strong in cavalry, and were slaughtering sheep wholesale for provision on the road. Each man carried a junk of flesh, a skin of water, and a little hay, and was then ready for a long campaign, for they were not soft like the English (their general boast), who must have their daily food; they were hardy enough to work without eating ten days in succession, if the emergency required it.
They (the Dhulbahante) did not fear guns. The English could not reach them; besides, their fathers had driven Christians from these lands; and if an army was to attack them, they would assemble so many cavalry, and ride in such rapidity around them, that their gunners could not take aim in consequence of the clouds of dust which this feat would occasion!
Dhulbahante are a nation who fight chiefly on horseback their arms being 2 spears and a shield. Their horses are powerful and courageous; the breed descended, according to Somali tradition, from the stud of Suleiman, the son of David, and consequently highly valued. The Dulbahante, as far as I have seen them, are a fine martial race of men, second to none of the branches of Darrood either in conduct or appearance, and they are described as being courteous and hospitable to the stranger who visits them."
My tribe alone could probably have mustered over 7500 cavalry, we had more horses than the entire desert Arabian Peninsula.
- Status
Trending
-
Somalis are the new targets - open your eyes to the racial conflict of the future- Started by Khaem
- Replies: 58
-
Islamic-relief.org.uk. ''Mogadishu was founded by settlers in the 8th century''- Started by Fobnimo Till I Dhimo
- Replies: 98
-
