One way or another there is definitely actual "Levantine" and "Anatolian" ancestry in Horners and ancient Sudanese people, walaal. Forget just looking at auDNA and Y-DNA, it's fairly apparent from mtDNA. My own N1a has been found en masse in Neolithic Anatolia (epipaleolithic too, I believe) and even all across Neolithic Europe from Anatolian Farmers colonizing the place. K1a, N1a, I, R0a, R0, U3a, U9a... I think it's pretty undeniable that these would have been markers that came straight from the Middle-East with Anatolian/Dzudzuana type ancestry and aren't some very, very ancient north-african hold out or back-migration like M1a might be.
Yes we definietly have actual Levantine/Anatolian ancestry I'm just saying the migration into the horn occured from egypt so neolithic Egyptian/Sudanese DNA will paint a better picture.
But my main point is that some of this ancestry will be native to Africa, the bottleneck that characterises Eurasian ancestry is consistently dated to pre OOA, meaning it occured inside Africa.
"The second scenario that stems from the presence of a non-African component in Morocco at least 15kya is a more radical one, and it reflects back on what we may call, genetically, Africa. Putting together genetic evidence for a Northern exit OoA (Pagani et al. 2015) with the archaeological and palaeoclimatic evidence for a drastic reduction of human presence along the lower Nile Valley from MSI4 (60-70kya) until 25kya (Vermeersch et al., 1990; Van Peer, 2004; Vermeersch& Van Neer, 2015), one may postulate that the progressive drying out of the North-East African region from 70kya triggered a population fragmentation in the area....
Such a scenario would imply the following: i) a potential cause for the genetic bottleneck that characterizes all non-African group was the progressive increase of aridity of the Nile corridor, rather than the expansion out of Africa of a few wanderers during environmentally permissive conditions; ii) such a bottleneck did not take place at the gateways of Africa but, rather, within Africa (along the Nile basin), and iii) as a consequence of the MIS4 arid period, all subsequent coastal North African populations should be considered “non-Africans” from a genetic viewpoint or, in other words, they should be expected to share the same 70kya genetic bottleneck signature that characterizes all contemporary non-Africans" -
What is Africa? A human perspective Luca Pagani
I'm sure you understand the implications of this, Eurasians/Non-Africans came into existence from a genetic standpoint, inside North East Africa. Which makes sense when certain East Africans like Dinkas and Mota show Eurasian ancestry without showing neanderthal, or at least, not enough to account for how much Eurasian they show. I think this native North African ancestry will account for a large amount of "Levantine" ancestry present in the Horn of Africa.