Evidence tell me when was the last attack in Mandera or wajir?Do you have evidence for this? A single evidence?
No.... Then stop spewing nonsense
And why MX are anti Kenya.When you connect the dots then its clear as a crystal.
Evidence tell me when was the last attack in Mandera or wajir?Do you have evidence for this? A single evidence?
No.... Then stop spewing nonsense
The worst inference I ever seen. These two don't even connect. What are you smoking.Evidence tell me when was the last attack in Mandera or wajir?
And why MX are anti Kenya.When you connect the dots then its clear as a crystal.
Kismaayo doesnt belong to Mx and never will so its not a brainer.Secondly Kismaayo was under AS when KDF with Madhoobe cpatured it,you were shacab in kismaayo and its not that you showed any resistance to AS who made you busy eating hyena meat and following orders of AS in Kismaayo.The worst inference I ever seen. These two don't even connect. What are you smoking.
Crisis24 | Actionable Risk Management
Discover security risk management & integrated risk management services & technologies offered to organizations worldwide by Crisis24, a GardaWorld company.www.garda.com
Crisis24 | Actionable Risk Management
Discover security risk management & integrated risk management services & technologies offered to organizations worldwide by Crisis24, a GardaWorld company.www.garda.com
MX are anti Kenya for a reason. Kenya for propping up a elicit regime down in Kismayo, being a continuous pain in our asses down in Xamar, innocent killings in Gedo, unwarranted drone attacks on civilians posts. So yes, we are anti-Kenya.
You was celebrating Jamhuri day yesterday, so how can I request evidence from a Kenyan mouthpiece
We tried out a central unified state and we saw how it turned out.
Unitary government at this point in time is not what we need, it in fact would hurt us more than help us. We can not unite upon just anything islamically and logically.Why do people on this site always fall back on this asinine argument? Historically, Somalis have never been unified under a single political entity; so what? Before 1871, Germany was a confederation of small states. After unifying they changed the political destiny of Europe forever. Today, they are the fifth largest economy in the world with the fourth highest HDI. Do you think they would have achieved even a fraction of their success if they remained divided?
As an aside, anyone making this argument really ought to familiarise themselves with the is-ought gap.
The idea that the unitary state is invalid, in perpetuity, because it failed in one particular context is ludicrous. The issue with Barre's government is not that it was centralised, but that it was a military dictatorship with no adequate balance of power. There was no bill of rights, independent judiciary, journalists, or any viable paths to change the political leadership of the nation. Not to mention, the country was at war with Ethiopia starting from at least mid-1960s and continuing well into the late-1980s. This heightened paranoia and possibly help justify increasingly draconian and regressive measures by the leadership.
Additionally, reducing a complex socio-political event to a single variable is wrong and far too simplistic. It is good to learn from your mistakes, but detrimental to learn the wrong lessons. The truth for post-war Somalia should have been "dictatorships are bad" not "unitary governments will always lead to failure". If anyone really believes this, count the number of unitary states in the top 20 economies.
Unitary government at this point in time is not what we need, it in fact would hurt us more than help us. We can not unite upon just anything islamically and logically.
The idea that the unitary state is invalid, in perpetuity, because it failed in one particular context is ludicrous. The issue with Barre's government is not that it was centralised, but that it was a military dictatorship with no adequate balance of power. There was no bill of rights, independent judiciary, journalists, or any viable paths to change the political leadership of the nation. Not to mention, the country was at war with Ethiopia starting from at least mid-1960s and continuing well into the late-1980s. This heightened paranoia and possibly help justify increasingly draconian and regressive measures by the leadership.
Additionally, reducing a complex socio-political event to a single variable is wrong and far too simplistic. It is good to learn from your mistakes, but detrimental to learn the wrong lessons. The truth for post-war Somalia should have been "dictatorships are bad" not "unitary governments will always lead to failure". If anyone really believes this, count the number of unitary states in the top 20 economies.
Naah its true MX have been attacking telecommunication masts hyjacking buses in Mandera and wajor and claimmed to be AS.
After the Gedo assaults seems like the attacks dropped significantly.
Tell me why?
Yes because mx have been trying to destroy the economy of NFD and trying to turn the Kenyan govt against reer NFD somalis.Is it true Kenya will build a wall on the Gedo border?
They should as it is their border and security matters unlike in xamar runned by idiotsIs it true Kenya will build a wall on the Gedo border?
One of them was on the radio calling kenya and jl/pl the same enemy states but did not have same energy for ethiopia when he was asked to and got madYes because mx have been trying to destroy the economy of NFD and trying to turn the Kenyan govt against reer NFD somalis.
Yoy know mx are weaklings and try to hide under populations.Ethiopia invaded Gheeto in 1995 and till today they still there.