Nin xun
ʜᴀᴄᴋᴇᴅ ᴍᴇᴍʙᴇʀ
Ur dumb
Ur argument is dumb, throwing in all americans of subsaharan descent muddles the data and gives no clear conclusion. Also lol at that justification, we don't use data from lions when discussing tigers, put down the crackpipe.I am playing your silly game of "data, data, data" but you are just far too daft to see it. :siilaanyolaugh:
In science, once a data set is established then one must necessarily assume it applies across the board unless other special evidence exists that demonstrates it doesn't necessarily apply to a particular subset of that data. That is exactly what I did. I claimed the marriage out rates were significantly higher for Somalis than "MENA" as you call them. I submitted the evidence wherein the statisticians behind the PEW study did not see enough of a differential across the different "black" subgroups to actually list it. Now, since you are making the claim that "no, Americanized Somalis are special and much different than other Sub-Saharan Africans in their endogamous rates", from the perspective of a scientific argument, the burden of proof now shifts to you to demonstrate that such a claim is in fact the case.
You can't win this argument both ways, sxb. There is no data pertaining to Somalis that you can bring forth to help your claim, because either the academics behind all of these studies do not see any meaningful difference between their behaviors and other westernized sub-Saharan Africans or they merely couldn't careless to expend resources in understanding your sociology. Both perspectives only further bolster my argument. :siilaanyolaugh: