DeathWish
Hotep and Hebrew Israelite
Don't be an ignorant suugo-pseudoscientist like @Amun and see the light. The DNA analysis was a lie. This is from the crocodile's mouth (the DNA research):Fair point.
I disagree about the Egyptian thing due to, again, me seeing more evidence saying otherwise and DNA analyses, but we are all different and have different opinions alhamdulillah, it's what makes life interesting.
Allah knows best.
"In their paper, the researchers acknowledged that “all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eveals-their-ancestry/?utm_term=.5cef42d9bf57
With this quote alone, I could disregard the whole study. They admit to it themselves that this is a lie. Let's not forget that Abusir is filled with foreigners.
"Importantly, there is evidence for foreign influence at Abusir el-Meleq. Individuals with Greek, Latin and Hebrew names are known to have lived at the site and several coffins found at the cemetery used Greek portrait image and adapted Greek statue types to suit ‘Egyptian’ burial practices.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694?proof=true&error=cookies_not_supported
Here is the opinion of a Ph.D. in Egyptology that worked for both the Cambridge and British Museum. Dr. Ashton also has an MA in Greek history, so she actually knows the difference between caucasians and Africans.
This is her opinion on the fake DNA research:
The sample size is very small; it is limited to a single area; it covers a period of over 1000 years; the majority of the sample was taken from Late Period to the Roman Period, so it really isn’t possible to extrapolate to earlier periods. All of these limitations are, if I recall correctly, cited in the full paper.
The sampling was heavily flawed. So, I don’t really see that the study is worth trying to rationalise.
http://kemetexpert.com/dna-from-kemet-does-it-really-have-all-of-the-answers/#comments
Join me nacalaa!!

Last edited: