Was I in the wrong?

AdoonkaAlle

Ragna qowl baa xira, dumarna meher baa xira.
Nope I didnt say anything. Im polite as already shown here. But why are you assuming I said something? Some girls are just assh0les by nature. Wouldnt you agree?




Shukansi lool. Ani iyo vix bad weyn baa noo dhexeesa. Shukansi macqul ma aha. Mida kale nin sheekh baan ahay. Dacwo kiliyan u wada vix

Maa sidasba ?lool iga raali noqo walaalkis, vix aqliga baa laga haye waxaa ku maqaan fikrada reer galbeedka, beri hore ayaa maskaxda laga adoonsaday ee haku daalin sxb


Mahadsanid
 

VixR

Veritas
Vixr & gooney112 seem like the same adorable sweet person to me, but dont bother with me tafadhaal.
I’m perplexed why you would think that?
:bell:
Nope I didnt say anything. Im polite as already shown here. But why are you assuming I said something? Some girls are just assh0les by nature. Wouldnt you agree?




Shukansi lool. Ani iyo vix bad weyn baa noo dhexeesa. Shukansi macqul ma aha. Mida kale nin sheekh baan ahay. Dacwo kiliyan u wada vix
Fair enough. If you say so. She’s definitely in the wrong then.
 
I am a uni student, and?

Did you really type the bold with a straight face?:cosbyhmm:

In the first world, more recently as women entered the workforce in numbers, most no longer require a man for their survival. Instead, it’s the model of a couple coming together of similar economic ground, which leaves room for looks and other traits to balance the equation.

But even in this system, there are women and men who prefer the throwback model of mutual exploitation, beauty for riches and riches for beauty, and to consider it prostitution is intellectually dishonest, because all couplings are essentially on an exchange continuum, and that’s what they chose build their relationship on.

Now for a look towards the third world, there’s no debating this model is the dominant reality there, due to a wealth distribution even more egregiously in favor of men (though importantly, not most men), so women are traditionally much more likely to select for the highest earning man they possibly can for the comfort of their offspring and of their self.

So you’re saying if these women happen not to be genuinely attracted to their mates, it automatically means it’s a prostitution of self, and that it cannot and does not often lead to a fruitful relationship in your eyes, because of this lack of mutual attraction? So you’re saying that most of worlds relationships are prostitution and not genuine.

I honestly can’t believe I have to explain this to you.

Why is mutual attraction more genuine reality and mutual exploitation isn’t?

You’re clearly living in a bubble.

This is why I asked about your parents.

:noneck:

I simply don't have the time to break all of this crazy talk down, piece-by-piece. But if we didn't know that you're actually a xalimo and rather some random post on the web, this would sound like some mgtow redpill incel loser justifying why they visit prostitutes or, sorry, "escorts" and how all relationships basically boil down to this "exchange". It's funny how you bring the third world into this, when we all know by your own standards most of the women in those marriages are not with men they otherwise would be with if their particular country adopted western culture. It's a total red-herring. As for my parents, physical attraction was absolutely the basis and I'm absolutely grateful for it. They are both from the same landheere sub-clan, so status or tribe had nothing to do with it.

Are you projecting? Why are you defending something that clearly most people do not agree with you on? Everyone knows the sex and intimacy in a relationship where there is mutual physical attraction is nowhere near the same for a relationship where at least one party is repulsed physically by the other. Why is that so hard to understand for you?:farmajoyaab:
 
Tell her now to make her own money. tell her she shouldn't rely you for her financial needs. it's 2018. women gotta bring their own cambuulo, if not, tell her to hit the road.
 
But even in this system, there are women and men who prefer the throwback model of mutual exploitation, beauty for riches and riches for beauty, and to consider it prostitution is intellectually dishonest, because all couplings are essentially on an exchange continuum, and that’s what they chose build their relationship on.

Before your expected convoluted response, I just wanted to comment on this interesting paragraph in your response. This type of relationship is dying fast, if it has not already. You yourself have even admitted earlier in the thread most men generally prefer women who are in the same socioeconomic/income bracket as them. The idea of a trophy wife may have appealed to a certain segment of wealthy dudes years ago, but with the courts the way they are and the huge liabilities associated with marrying a woman who is well below your socioeconomic ladder, this relationship dynamic is basically dead.

Inb4 sugar-baby nonsense. A sugar baby is a very different thing than a trophy-wife/gold-digger.
 

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
5560.jpg
whispers to self
 
No you werent wrong at all. By what your saying it seems as if MONEY is a big deal to her. The moment you told her I make enough she should have left it alone. For her to keep pushing , waiting for you to give her exact numbers shows she's interested too much in your income. Unless your married to her which as I read isnt the case she shouldn't be concerned with how much your bringing home. Be careful and listen to how she talks and acts. Sometimes people show their true colors without even knowing. Pay attention!

I have known this girl about 2 weeks. I have gone out with her 3 times...she is allright except being overly dramatic. But what woman isnt. Anyway we had a conversation on the phone and she asks me how much I made. I said allhamdulillah I make enough. She says so how much and being all pushy...so I try to change subject and she goes back to it. I said Im like a white man when it comes to these things. I dont like to talk about it.

She gets mad and say so you dont make good money then. Now Im annoyed and say Im make more than you so just leave it. She gets mad and say so I bet you dont even make a lot and start to bring figures up is it more than this or this. I say yo just fvcking leave it. And say I gotta go. I was actually p1ssed and didnt wanna say foul sh1t. I have no problem with the question. But the aggressive way she asked pissed me off. This dumbass should have good idea what I make knowing the field I work in
 
No you werent wrong at all. By what your saying it seems as if MONEY is a big deal to her. The moment you told her I make enough she should have left it alone. For her to keep pushing , waiting for you to give her exact numbers shows she's interested too much in your income. Unless your married to her which as I read isnt the case she shouldn't be concerned with how much your bringing home. Be careful and listen to how she talks and acts. Sometimes people show their true colors without even knowing. Pay attention!
You are right. But I am catious person by nature and take my time
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top