@Suldaanka you need to understand that the mentality of those who argue against the legality of female circumcision in islam, is one that has been conditioned to espouse western morality. The conditioning is so severe that they don't realise the apparent contradiction and double standards in place when it comes to "FGM"
To them "FGM" is only a tradition that's carried out by somalis, etc basicallay non-cadan people, but this isn't reality as it's also occurs among cadanka albeit under a different name altogether "FGCS" (female genital cosmetic surgery). It's mutilation when it's done only by non-cadan groups irrespective of the setting it's carried out in ie in medical or non-medical setting. Essentially this leads to dehumanization of non-cadan people and their culture. A point these gabdha don't seem to realise and reflect over.
Despite your attempts to explain that "FGM" comprises a wide range of modification made to the female genitalia and that the lesser forms of "FGM" is comparable to male circumcision. To refute your argument the extreme forms of "FGM" is brought forth as evidence to shut down any attempt of discussion. As if that helps their case, some of the cosmetic surgeries carried out on the female genitalia come under type 2 &4 "FGM" as defined by WHO.
Despite this fact FGCS is lawful while FGM is banned even though procedures done are the same. The ban has more to do with the reasoning behind the modifications and the culture that it takes place in ie non-cadan culture and reasons aren't acceptable. This why all women who hail from cultures where gudnin is the norm for gabdho are forbidden by law to have any modifications while their cadan counterparts can do as they please bal ka waran ?? a young cadan teenager is given the choice while a grown adult non-cadan woman is barred from having the same privilege. I wonder whatever happened to "my body "my choice" etc ??????
Gabdho gumaysga intas la eeg maxaa faaido ay ledahay ??? Hurdada ka kaca min fadlik