I'll give Poland, Croatia & some other Slavic states a pass to be in the Western camp because despite their Slavic ethnic identity they have actively participated in Western Civilisation in the past and are traditionally Catholic countries among other reasons.Lol, Belarus and Russia are best buddies:
![]()
Meanwhile.. Ukraine, lol:
![]()
I'll give Poland, Croatia & some other Slavic states a pass to be in the Western camp because despite their Slavic ethnic identity they have actively participated in Western Civilisation in the past and are traditionally Catholic countries among other reasons.
Ukraine on the other is a sort of a beg friend to the West despite the fact they have far more in common with Russia due to the common Orthodox/Slavic-Eastern European Civilizational heritage.
Lukashencko misses the Iron Curtain days and has resisted NATO infiltration this is my favourite interview where he schools the reporter on Belarus policies and historyImagine if Eritrea acted like this with Ethiopian leadership while Ethiopia is killing Tigrayans.
![]()
Lukashencko misses the Iron Curtain days and has resisted NATO infiltration this is my favourite interview where he schools the reporter on Belarus policies and history
It was before the current international order that Spain was known as Al-Andalus and Muslims were a big international power feared by the world. Al-Andalus represents the kind of things that can be achieved once the kuffar are out of the way. And if there is no big kaffir world police, the kuffar are in a much weaker position to prevent things like Al-Andalus and to prevent Muslims from establishing the sharia and becoming powerful.
Come on, Al-Andalus was in Spain, so you can't use that as an example in your ostensibly anti-imperialists arguments.
I am anti-imperialist. Just not when it comes to Muslim imperialism.
Then you're not an anti-imperialist and there's no morally consistent basis for your arguments; you just hate being subject to the power of another.
you just hate being subject to the power of another.
I am an anti-imperialist- I am opposed to imperialism of my enemies. But am I some sort of liberal f***ot who believes in some sort of universal abstract opposition to all forms of imperialism? Am I supposed to cry about the glorious conquests of Umar ibn Al Khattab or the epic victories of the Ottomans over the Christian Europeans? Do I need to write the Hindus an apology letter about the Mughals? No, of course I don't believe in that. Furthermore, I am a Mexicoweyn expansionist who believes in annexing California, Texas and Central America. Furthermore, I am a proud imperialist who believes in Mexico practicing "leadership" throughout Latin America and Spain, who proudly supports our current President's interference in the affairs of less powerful Latin American nations, who supports a weaker United States because middle finger to our opposition and who believes Mexico and Latin America can and should be world powers who are champions and defenders of the Third World- that we should play a global role.
What's wrong with that?
Yes- and? Yes, I'm not a cuck. Guilty as charged.
Nobody is asking you to feel personally responsible for acts of imperialism by Muslims centuries in the past... but you can't use rhetoric that decries the penchant of the West to impose its beliefs on others while also wishing to do the same to others.