turks/ottomans were colonist

[haqiiiiiin]

turk/ottoman has colonised most muslim land and country saudi was doing was to get back their land
i dont see nothing wrong wiht most will say turk have right to control other people you have coloniel mind if u say that but who is not to colonines muslim couuntrys and controll their border and econamic and education system
if turk do that to somalis it is colonines and it is wrong
they cant tell no one we will rule over your land and economic and
resource
that is simpy colony
they used islam and politic to colonise other people land and took slaves from europe
some of are sick minded tht you will see if you colonise my muslim
that you have to obey and be on his side
if turks or any other non somali colonise somali i will not obey them and be on their side nor i support them
everyone should rule their own land
just cuz we share same faith doesnt mean you will colonise us
@HanadR6 or @Lostbox tag for me will ya

 

[CaliTedesse]

Wow first time I agree with you. Ottoman was not a caliph. It just masqueraded behind Islam.

 

[Al Muslim]

turk/ottoman has colonised most muslim land and country saudi was doing was to get back their land
i dont see nothing wrong wiht most will say turk have right to control other people you have coloniel mind if u say that but who is not to colonines muslim couuntrys and controll their border and econamic and education system
if turk do that to somalis it is colonines and it is wrong
they cant tell no one we will rule over your land and economic and
resource
that is simpy colony
they used islam and politic to colonise other people land and took slaves from europe
some of are sick minded tht you will see if you colonise my muslim
that you have to obey and be on his side
if turks or any other non somali colonise somali i will not obey them and be on their side nor i support them
everyone should rule their own land
just cuz we share same faith doesnt mean you will colonise us
@HanadR6 or @Lostbox tag for me will ya

Saudis were puppets backed by Britain and france. If the Ottomans were still in control then Palestine would be ours and the Islamic world would be in much better shape.

 

[CaliTedesse]

Saudis were puppets backed by Britain and france. If the Ottomans were still in control then Palestine would be ours and the Islamic world would be in much better shape.

Hooyada u sheeg you idiot it's Turks themselves with the rise of the Young Turks that caused Ottoman state to get dismantled you really think nationalist Turks would not give Palestine away to their European masters they so badly wanted to mimic.

They were f*cking gaal wannabes. Their nationalism caused Arab nationalism which was good.

 

[Al Muslim]

Hooyada u sheeg you idiot it's Turks themselves with the rise of the Young Turks that caused Ottoman state to get dismantled you really think nationalist Turks would not give Palestine away to their European masters they so badly wanted to mimic.

They were f*cking gaal wannabes. Their nationalism caused Arab nationalism which was good.

We are talking about the ottomans here no? The majority of Turkey now is against the young turks as you can see with Erdogan being leader. The secularist degenerates were and are now a minority in their nation. If world war two went differently then the ottomans would have remained and the majority of the middle east issues would not exist today. You can't deny the Saudis are westerns puppets.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

Saudis were puppets backed by Britain and france. If the Ottomans were still in control then Palestine would be ours and the Islamic world would be in much better shape.

again another muslim cant colonise another muslim country and ottamans were in the wrong for contrling saudi and their land and resource

 

[haqiiiiiin]

We are talking about the ottomans here no? The majority of Turkey now is against the young turks as you can see with Erdogan being leader. The secularist degenerates were and are now a minority in their nation. If world war two went differently then the ottomans would have remained and the majority of the middle east issues would not exist today. You can't deny the Saudis are westerns puppets.

stop supporting a coloniel

 

[Maximus]

again another muslim cant colonise another muslim country and ottamans were in the wrong for contrling saudi and their land and resource

Saudi arabia didn’t exist pre-ww1. If anyone had the right to hejaz, it was the Sharif of Mecca.

He was played by the Brits and French. The miskeen fella actually bought into their lies and was played dirty with

He thought he’ll get an empire uniting the levant and gulf


But after that, the Saudis took over hejaz and were welcomed by the brits, french, and later on the Americans (all zionists).

So to be honest, I won’t say the ottomans were colonisers; the Hejazis fought against another muslim kingdom and allied with the Zionists Brits.

 

[Juke]

The Ottoman empire was a just new dynasty in the Roman (Byzantine) empire. They ruled the same lands as they had before. The empire just transitioned from greek speaking, orthodox Christians to oghuz turkish speaking, muslims. The ottoman sultan retained the same titles as the emperor of the roman empire, Europeans like differentiate them because they were Muslim and Asian. The Habsburgs created the word Byzantine in the 16th century for this purpose.The ottomans even used Rumi (roman) as their name for themselves.

Turks/Mongols expanded from Northern China; multiple dynasties ruled China, South Asia, Iran, Middle east (ottomans), Siberia up until the age of European colonialism.

 

[SOMALI GENERAL]

Of course the Ottomans were colonisers/imperialists like any other Empire.

Luckily for the Turks, their visionary leader Atatürk saved the Turkish nation & began modernising it.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

Saudi arabia didn’t exist pre-ww1. If anyone had the right to hejaz, it was the Sharif of Mecca.

He was played by the Brits and French. The miskeen fella actually bought into their lies and was played dirty with

He thought he’ll get an empire uniting the levant and gulf


But after that, the Saudis took over hejaz and were welcomed by the brits, french, and later on the Americans (all zionists).

So to be honest, I won’t say the ottomans were colonisers; the Hejazis fought against another muslim kingdom and allied with the Zionists Brits.

Ottamans control the hejaz before even brits came to Arabia and that is colonial

 

[Ayubi]

Nope, The Ottoman empire was a legitimate Muslim Khalifa which all Muslims at that time loved. They were the fighters and protectors of Islam. If I was living in the middle ages, I would support them to rule my lands. Also, Turkish nationalism didn't exist at that time, it first started in the late 20th century which led to the collapse of the empire.

The Ottomans were all about Islamic brotherhood, they conquered Constantinople as the prophet prophesied it would happen. May Allah bless them.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

Nope, The Ottoman empire was a legitimate Muslim Khalifa which all Muslims at that time loved. They were the fighters and protectors of Islam. If I was living in the middle ages, I would support them to rule my lands. Also, Turkish nationalism didn't exist at that time, it first started in the late 20th century which led to the collapse of the empire.

The Ottomans were all about Islamic brotherhood, they conquered Constantinople as the prophet prophesied it would happen. May Allah bless them.

Ottamans were colonisers/imperialists like any other Empire.

 

[Ayubi]

Of course the Ottomans were colonisers/imperialists like any other Empire.

Luckily for the Turks, their visionary leader Atatürk saved the Turkish nation & began modernising it.

Ataturk was a secular munafiq who hated Islam and did everything to prevent it. As Muslims, it's our duty to uphold the Khilafa but Shaydan Mustafa Kemal destroyed it.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

Nope, The Ottoman empire was a legitimate Muslim Khalifa which all Muslims at that time loved. They were the fighters and protectors of Islam. If I was living in the middle ages, I would support them to rule my lands. Also, Turkish nationalism didn't exist at that time, it first started in the late 20th century which led to the collapse of the empire.

The Ottomans were all about Islamic brotherhood, they conquered Constantinople as the prophet prophesied it would happen. May Allah bless them.

Who made them Khalid lo Khalifa means leader which every muslim Kingdom had
Ottamans were colonisers/imperialists
Never will I support them so that they can colonial somalia
Get out with your bullsht here
Stop justifying by saying khalifa every muslim lande had khalifa
And titles khalifa has been used to colinise other land

 

[Maximus]

Ottamans control the hejaz before even brits came to Arabia and that is colonial

The Hejazis had no right to rebel against the ottomans (Quran; Surah Maidah: 51); bare in mind that they revolted after the Brits promised them the whole Arabian gulf and the levant.


I don’t support the ottomans, nor the Arabs. Both failed in the end either way

 

[SOMALI GENERAL]

Ataturk was a secular munafiq who hated Islam and did everything to prevent it. As Muslims, it's our duty to uphold the Khilafa but Shaydan Mustafa Kemal destroyed it.

You're naive. The Ottomans were an empire not a caliphate.

As for Ataturk, he's a respectable guy that fought against Britain, France, Italy & Greece e.g to save his nation after the empire crumbled. Ataturk guided the nation & laid the foundation for economic prosperity & modernity for his people.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

The Hejazis had no right to rebel against the ottomans (Quran; Surah Maidah: 51); bare in mind that they revolted after the Brits promised them the whole Arabian gulf and the levant.


I don’t support the ottomans, nor the Arabs. Both failed in the end either way

Again Ottamans took by forced and ottomans cant go and colonise other muslim land dont using Quran to justified colonilism
Saudi had every right to rebel if their been colonise by ottomans

 

[Ayubi]

Who made them Khalid lo Khalifa means leader which every muslim King from had
Ottamans were colonisers/imperialists
Never will I support them so that they can colonial somalia
Get out with your bullsht here

Abu Bakr and the sahaba conquered land. Conquests was a very necessary thing before and they did it for the sake of Islam and Islamic dominion. If I lived at the time of the Sahaba and they wanted to conquer my lands, I will except it for the sake of Muslim brotherhood. It's agreed by All Muslims that the Ottoman empire was a legitimate khilafa and they fought for the sake of Islam until everything turned ugly in the early 20th century.

 

[haqiiiiiin]

I

Abu Bakr and the sahaba conquered land. Conquests was a very necessary thing before and they did it for the sake of Islam and Islamic dominion. If I lived at the time of the Sahaba and they wanted to conquer my lands, I will except it for the sake of Muslim brotherhood. It's agreed by All Muslims that the Ottoman empire was a legitimate khilafa and they fought for the sake of Islam until everything turned ugly in the early 20th century.

I Will not accept it and it is wrong to colonise others you dumb you will proobly accept arabs and ottomans taking somalis slaves and non somali slaves lol

This man Realy said he will accept arabs and ottomans to conquer somali
Cuz they muslim
@SOMALI GENERAL @Samaalic Era