Anyways I know it works because all my work career I cheated, I was taking crumbs from each person I worked with and his strength and added and ignored his negative and did with all to make myself damn complete. First it was hey this guy troubleshoot well, so i learned the method to troubleshoot( i am lazy now) but i know how do it when shit hits the fan. Then it was this person talks well so I learned that and moved into architecture(how to link business to tech) model similar to your house sxb u dont buy shit u dont need and u determine ur needs at home first, u do the same there and then cost it for value.
I was adding adding anigu all my career and keeping it for myself. The only thing i didnt learn was negiotation and diplomacy in that architecture role, I havent yet met one to cheat from. Plus sxb I never managed anyone but I had so many managers I mentally noted what worked and added them over time also especially the strengths cause they all have weaknesses u disregard it. Just add up the strengths and add it to yourself.
Thats why im telling u somaliyay, cheat cheat cheat forget the rules, you cant scream rules at nature it wont respond. Life isnt based on rules habartooda ha waseen if they say it is. U play within the rules thats it, u dont adapt yourself to it for life. Now im watching trump negiotation and diplomacy teams on kim, why? cause i wanna seee him? no so i cant fuckin cheat again. PPL think smartness is reading doing what others do and all that it isnt in all honesty UNLESS ITS WORKING obviously, its about RESULTS at the end of the day.
I remember when I first started my career, i planned it out to get technical skills so I went technical role and then it was get speaking skills so i went customer side of my role. Then I got stuck and said what the f*ck do I do now, so being young in my 20s, I just typed in highest paying IT job. Enterprise architecture came up, read it and said ok, then started looking out for it like any openings and intern type roles and thought get intern type role then move to 300k a year after 5 years. Short cut dont have cut all thru heirachy of IT.
Then I got there and their is a fuckin reason their paid high, I learned to respect CEO and CIO after that role, never would sit around even when i left when I heard them abused by fellow colleagues. They don't have a fuckin clue what's on the line there for them. U fucked up there, u arent getting a job ever again, its small circle and they know each other. Its ride or die type role, thats when i realized architecture is good enuff pays 300k and its not ride or die. U can always get another achitecture job, its so public like those ceo and cio. That's when I decided I wont seek leadership roles, its not worth the risk when the pay aint much different to architecture.
At the level like C grade u aint doing the work or managing it, your imagining it and guiding the ones below to do it as you see the end result but then u gotta translate into reality and if u f*ck up you aint getting another job, notice they all FUCKIN RETIRE.
The closest lament example I can give is it's like when u do restorations to a home, some just can get stuck in and pray it all goes well, well not thats unacceptable, it has to be imagined the whole thing and then designed on paper and then executed. They wont waste milllions on trial n error u just wont get it. That's why its hard to work there without imagining your work. Its like u see the support guys, the tech guys, design guys, business functions, how the technology hits, how well, cost, the inputs it needs and outputs it gives, how long can it last, seeing operate first in imagination and converting to visual designs. But I was exposed only to CIO the IT c grade, didnt see CFO or CEO which is another fuckin problem.
CIO sxb just pins the tech to ppl to the process linked to the vision and and ensure values are enshrined in the staff, the way the work carried out, security and all regulations met, and it's how much value did u provide that's measuring stick. Cause anyone can do it but they can spend billions while u spend millions to do a better job. I think the principles are the same but the context has expanded with CEO its not just technology and its related functions. But I can't comment on it as I havent seen it with my own eyes. Its all about value driving in that area, I heard my CIO, value value value all the time in her office cause I was next cubicle.