• The site is experiencing some temp downtime. It will be over soon. Thanks for your patience.

Somaliland’s Minister of Interior chased from Saylac town

Yh which is a retarded move, and clearly they don’t want peace unless you consider eastern sool to not be apart of Somaliland
As I see both communities living in the east want peace and the issue of eastern Sool doesn't need to solved through military force as it will resolve by itself
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Saylac to Bulaxaar was Ciise & HA. This where majority of the HA-Ciise conflict had happened. I swear you people are fucking gypsies

Everyone is allowed to believe in their own delusions so I will not fault you. However the facts will not change. And the British playing fiddle with friendly clans to reduce the others' influence will never change the facts on the ground.

The Gadabursi lived all the way to Bulhar and covered the tract from there all the way to Wajalale:
Gadabuursi Awdal Harawo2.jpg


Kalangeret was a Gadabursi coastal town where the French met the Gadabursi. It is even recorded in the French Treaty with the Gadabursi as being an important port town:
Screenshot_20251119_175952_Samsung Internet.jpg

Articles 2 of the treaty: "The French government will have the option of opening one or more commercial ports on the coast belonging to the territory of the Gada-boursis."


It's mentioned here aswell as part of the Gadabursi territory:
media_G2kIFygW4AAqLKg.png

Script: "Mohamed Abdi Liban, a wealthy merchant from El Darad (Ceel Daraad), alongside Haji Sharmarke, attempted to establish a settlement in Kalangreet, in the land of the Gadabuursi tribe".


Even Gadabursi bedouin raiders' headquarters were based in Wadi Aschat in the coastal strip east of Saylac:
20251119_140322.jpg


20251119_140326.jpg

20251119_140329.jpg


No politicized British favouritism actually changes the reality on the ground. There was a reason why the British had a vested interest in giving the impression that we were not significant and that's because we initally chose the French until relations with them soured in the 1960's. But the reality on the ground always reigns supreme.
 
In the 2012 local elections when the border was closed, the Ciise weren't even able to get a few councillors into the Zeila local council and lost in a humiliating way:


View attachment 378185


Fast forward to the 2021 local elections when Biixi opened the border when he was on friendly terms with IOG and placed 13 polling stations in Lawyacado on the border with Djibouti to get the Ciise to win. Had the border been closed and only those who lived within the district voted everyone in this life and the Afterlife knows that the Ciise would not be able to win.

View attachment 378186

FYI: Boon is part of Salal, but during the elections the polling stations of Boon come under Borama districts so the votes in any elections go straight to Borama.
The first mayor of saylac was ciise from 1960 to 2012 gadabursi have no history in the city . Were do you live other then fiqi aden and Sheekh aware area???? 4 tulos makes gadabursi the extreme minority

heres a video of the last mayor ciise mayor of saylac (2012) before Dahir riyaale took his cousins from boon (150km away) to saylac.

 
The British had a vested interest to reduce our land territories because we signed a Treaty with the French giving them the entire coast. So the British played clan politics by supporting friendly clans like the Ciise when justifying their claim to the coast. It's no surprise when the French like Rimbaud came and surveyed the coastal strip he mentioned the whole coast from Zeila to Bulhar was Gadabursi:

View attachment 378187
Even the French said gadabursi were landlocked. They even cracksd jokes about how gadabursi have no coast. "Gadabursi having a coast is like Switzerland having a coast on the Mediterranean sea. Adkatay :chrisfreshhah: who's lying gadabursi or the Europeans ??

1000017190.jpg

1000017191.jpg
 
View attachment 378188

"There was a general fear, rightly so, of the Danâkil, that a caravan couldn't have been persuaded to take this path. Danger also existed for the route we chose via Wárabot and Henssa, made unsafe by the Gadaburssi raiders, but is the one more frequently committed."
Paulitschke

There was a time when the two roads from Zeila was dominated by the Afar and Gadabursi.
Nigga even habar awals were raiding the caravan nothing special.

But the ciises owned the Zeila Harar caravan routes and every visiter says the same
1000017192.jpg



Egyptian were forced pay taxes to ciise because ot the important infrastructure that we control.

1000017193.png
 
Everyone is allowed to believe in their own delusions so I will not fault you. However the facts will not change. And the British playing fiddle with friendly clans to reduce the others' influence will never change the facts on the ground.

The Gadabursi lived all the way to Bulhar and covered the tract from there all the way to Wajalale:
View attachment 378231

Kalangeret was a Gadabursi coastal town where the French met the Gadabursi. It is even recorded in the French Treaty with the Gadabursi as being an important port town:
View attachment 378240
Articles 2 of the treaty: "The French government will have the option of opening one or more commercial ports on the coast belonging to the territory of the Gada-boursis."


It's mentioned here aswell as part of the Gadabursi territory:
View attachment 378241
Script: "Mohamed Abdi Liban, a wealthy merchant from El Darad (Ceel Daraad), alongside Haji Sharmarke, attempted to establish a settlement in Kalangreet, in the land of the Gadabuursi tribe".


Even Gadabursi bedouin raiders' headquarters were based in Wadi Aschat in the coastal strip east of Saylac:
View attachment 378232

View attachment 378235
View attachment 378236

No politicized British favouritism actually changes the reality on the ground. There was a reason why the British had a vested interest in giving the impression that we were not significant and that's because we initally chose the French until relations with them soured in the 1960's. But the reality on the ground always reigns supreme.

Dont ever bring up that treaty ever again. The French ripped it up after British told them the coast you claim belonged to ciises 😂😂😂

1000017195.jpg
1000017194.jpg
 
Everyone is allowed to believe in their own delusions so I will not fault you. However the facts will not change. And the British playing fiddle with friendly clans to reduce the others' influence will never change the facts on the ground.

The Gadabursi lived all the way to Bulhar and covered the tract from there all the way to Wajalale:
View attachment 378231

Kalangeret was a Gadabursi coastal town where the French met the Gadabursi. It is even recorded in the French Treaty with the Gadabursi as being an important port town:
View attachment 378240
Articles 2 of the treaty: "The French government will have the option of opening one or more commercial ports on the coast belonging to the territory of the Gada-boursis."


It's mentioned here aswell as part of the Gadabursi territory:
View attachment 378241
Script: "Mohamed Abdi Liban, a wealthy merchant from El Darad (Ceel Daraad), alongside Haji Sharmarke, attempted to establish a settlement in Kalangreet, in the land of the Gadabuursi tribe".


Even Gadabursi bedouin raiders' headquarters were based in Wadi Aschat in the coastal strip east of Saylac:
View attachment 378232

View attachment 378235
View attachment 378236

No politicized British favouritism actually changes the reality on the ground. There was a reason why the British had a vested interest in giving the impression that we were not significant and that's because we initally chose the French until relations with them soured in the 1960's. But the reality on the ground always reigns supreme.
Yeah everbody is angianst gadabursi for some reason huh justt to show you how much of a liar these Gadabursi are ill show you pictures of ciises living saylac in 1889
1000017186.jpg


FB_IMG_1762641995615.jpg


1000016992.jpg
1000016993.jpg


Just in case you have doubts here is agent who came to Zeila and Studied the people there they said 75% of Saylac was Ciise. The rest were merchants and goverment workers.
1000017196.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000017186.jpg
    1000017186.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 3
Everyone is allowed to believe in their own delusions so I will not fault you. However the facts will not change. And the British playing fiddle with friendly clans to reduce the others' influence will never change the facts on the ground.

The Gadabursi lived all the way to Bulhar and covered the tract from there all the way to Wajalale:
View attachment 378231

Kalangeret was a Gadabursi coastal town where the French met the Gadabursi. It is even recorded in the French Treaty with the Gadabursi as being an important port town:
View attachment 378240
Articles 2 of the treaty: "The French government will have the option of opening one or more commercial ports on the coast belonging to the territory of the Gada-boursis."


It's mentioned here aswell as part of the Gadabursi territory:
View attachment 378241
Script: "Mohamed Abdi Liban, a wealthy merchant from El Darad (Ceel Daraad), alongside Haji Sharmarke, attempted to establish a settlement in Kalangreet, in the land of the Gadabuursi tribe".


Even Gadabursi bedouin raiders' headquarters were based in Wadi Aschat in the coastal strip east of Saylac:
View attachment 378232

View attachment 378235
View attachment 378236

No politicized British favouritism actually changes the reality on the ground. There was a reason why the British had a vested interest in giving the impression that we were not significant and that's because we initally chose the French until relations with them soured in the 1960's. But the reality on the ground always reigns supreme.
That guy is right mamasn always used to border Habar awals on the coast near bulhar we fought there all the time.
From 1889
1000017197.png


Heres a video of ciises living in ceel sheekh duriing Cirro Election which gadabursi live nowhere near

 
Fighting over a historical city that looks like rust cod barren land nothing built no port no roads nothing and you part of disneyland lol case in point why somalis will never move forward
 

Araabi

Awdalite
The first mayor of saylac was ciise from 1960 to 2012 gadabursi have no history in the city . Were do you live other then fiqi aden and Sheekh aware area???? 4 tulos makes gadabursi the extreme minority

heres a video of the last mayor ciise mayor of saylac (2012) before Dahir riyaale took his cousins from boon (150km away) to saylac.


From the first local elections ever held in SL in 2000/2001 and the first parliamentary elections in 2005, the mayor of Saylac was Gadabursi. Before the local elections in 2012, the seat was vacated to the former Ciise deputy mayor and in after those elections it was a landslide because you couldn't illegally vote from Djibouti:
Lughaya councillors.jpg



Boon comes under the Borama district and not Saylac. That's the 2nd time you mentioned inaccurate information:
Screenshot_20251119_204953_Drive.jpg

Even when the British demarcated the 6 regions in Somaliland, they mentioned the Ciise do not settle in British Somaliland:
Screenshot_20251119_204331_Samsung Internet.jpg

"They (Issa) are nomadic and therefore, unlike the Gadabursi, have no permanent interest in the land."

The Italians when describing the Ciise, mentioned them as a wandering clan and that it is the Gadabursi who settle in Saylac:
Italian population estimate of the Dir.png


The Ciise were known as a loyal clan to all and every single colonial power.
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Nigga even habar awals were raiding the caravan nothing special.

But the ciises owned the Zeila Harar caravan routes and every visiter says the same View attachment 378261


Egyptian were forced pay taxes to ciise because ot the important infrastructure that we control.

View attachment 378262

So what is exactly your point? The Darmi Pass that goes east of Saylac to Harar was Gadabursi. Whereas you shared the route with the Nole Oromo, whereas pit route was exclusively Gadabursi:
Screenshot_20251119_210345_Drive.jpg
 
Ciises loyal to colonial powers ??????????

Let me prove why the British have no reason to lie

Ciises fought the British twice and beat them while Gadabursi never fought them
FB_IMG_1761833441711.jpg

the Gadabursi were actual puppets of the British like Ugaas Elmi who brought 500 Gadabursi men to fight for the in the dervish war

20251110_001617.jpg
 
So what is exactly your point? The Darmi Pass that goes east of Saylac to Harar was Gadabursi. Whereas you shared the route with the Nole Oromo, whereas pit route was exclusively Gadabursi:
View attachment 378283
All you did the whole time was give me second hand sources, I have provided British and French first hand accounts of who controlled the caravan and who lived on the coast.

When you have actual proof let me know
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Dont ever bring up that treaty ever again. The French ripped it up after British told them the coast you claim belonged to ciises 😂😂😂

View attachment 378267View attachment 378269

The French government abandoned it because they came to a settlement with the British:
Screenshot_20251119_210811_Samsung Internet.jpg


Had nothing to do with the French 'finding' out that it was actually the Ciise all along. Absolutely comical stuff.

Rimbaud himself toured the whole coast:
Gadabursi coast.png
 

Araabi

Awdalite
All you did the whole time was give me second hand sources, I have provided British and French first hand accounts of who controlled the caravan and who lived on the coast.

When you have actual proof let me know

Isn't this the same source you used:
20221120_180331.jpg


The route from Zeila to Harar that passed through Issa territory was shared with the Nole Oromo. Our route was exclusively Gadabursi, shorter, quicker and more direct.
 
The French government abandoned it because they came to a settlement with the British:
View attachment 378286

Had nothing to do with the French 'finding' out that it was actually the Ciise all along. Absolutely comical stuff.

Rimbaud himself toured the whole coast:
View attachment 378288
Alfred bardey said the treaty would never work because you didn't have coast and he was right. Alfred been through Gadabursi territory like mutliple times btw


1000017199.jpg
 
Top