• The site is experiencing some temp downtime. It will be over soon. Thanks for your patience.

Somaliland’s Minister of Interior chased from Saylac town

Araabi

Awdalite
That guy is right mamasn always used to border Habar awals on the coast near bulhar we fought there all the time.
From 1889
View attachment 378280

Heres a video of ciises living in ceel sheekh duriing Cirro Election which gadabursi live nowhere near


And what is your point? The surroundings of Zeila was purely Afar and Gadabursi until the mid 1880's.
media_G2vo8GvW4AAe32i.jpg


The Afar migrated westward and thats when you arrived.
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Alfred bardey said the treaty would never work because you didn't have coast and he was right. Alfred been through Gadabursi territory like mutliple times btw


View attachment 378290

Rimbaud, Paulitschke, Reclus who all went to the coast were wrong but the colonial India Office which played can politics to favour the nomadic Ciise clan because they have no permanent settlement were right? Even the British made the admission:

Screenshot_20251119_204331_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Isn't this the same source you used:
View attachment 378289

The route from Zeila to Harar that passed through Issa territory was shared with the Nole Oromo. Our route was exclusively Gadabursi, shorter, quicker and more direct.

And what is your point? The surroundings of Zeila was purely Afar and Gadabursi until the mid 1880's.
View attachment 378291

The Afar migrated westward and thats when you arrived.
75 % of Zeila are Issas this from an eye acount witness who came studied the town and people 1884

1000017196.jpg



About the surroundings ciise controlled it all we even used to sell the salt in toqoshi
To Harar for high prices 1876
1000017202.png
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Alfred bardey said the treaty would never work because you didn't have coast and he was right. Alfred been through Gadabursi territory like mutliple times btw


View attachment 378290

How coincidental that the British who made a treaty asking the Gadabursi to use their ports all of a sudden after the French Treaty was signed, they remembered how actually it was the non permanent Ciise nomads who the area belonged to?
content.png

Your rationale sounds ridiculous.
 
Rimbaud, Paulitschke, Reclus who all went to the coast were wrong but the colonial India Office which played can politics to favour the nomadic Ciise clan because they have no permanent settlement were right? Even the British made the admission:

View attachment 378293
The French said you lied about your coastal territory and thats why your deal fell though. Gadabursi have farmers that why they werent as nomadic


1000017194.jpg



Theres pictures of ciises living in saylac in 1890 just stop yapping your finished


1000016992.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000017199.jpg
    1000017199.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 3

Garaad Awal

Former African
75 % of Zeila are Issas this from an eye acount witness who came studied the town and people 1884

View attachment 378292


About the surroundings ciise controlled it all we even used to sell the salt in toqoshi
To Harar for high prices 1876
View attachment 378294
They live in an alternate reality. Ciise & us Sacad Muuse know very well what the previous border used to be like. Interestingly many of the HA clans that lived on the SL coast had left for Jabuuti just like the Ciise. This depopulation gave way for Samarone migration to the coast. These are people who knew nothing of the sea/coast nor of trade.
 
How coincidental that the British who made a treaty asking the Gadabursi to use their ports all of a sudden after the French Treaty was signed, they remembered how actually it was the non permanent Ciise nomads who the area belonged to?
View attachment 378298
Your rationale sounds ridiculous.
Thats because ciise allowed gadabursi to use saylac port. The British were clear when they said you had to cross ciise territory.

1000017181.png


The British also clearly stated that Zeila port belonges to ciises and they mentioned our 600 huts in the city
1000017203.png
 
They live in an alternate reality. Ciise & us Sacad Muuse know very well what the previous border used to be like. Interestingly many of the HA clans that lived on the SL coast had left for Jabuuti just like the Ciise. This depopulation gave way for Samarone migration to the coast. These are people who knew nothing of the sea/coast nor of trade.
Facts even when you give them proof they deny. Even today 90% of awfal coast belongs to ciise
Look at lughaya
From hadayte to ceel shiekh we still live there gadabursi only have like 15km of coast today 😂
 
They live in an alternate reality. Ciise & us Sacad Muuse know very well what the previous border used to be like. Interestingly many of the HA clans that lived on the SL coast had left for Jabuuti just like the Ciise. This depopulation gave way for Samarone migration to the coast. These are people who knew nothing of the sea/coast nor of trade.
The Somalis that built the economy of Jabuuti and were the merchants and traders of the city were Isaaq iyo Samroon not Ciise as they're nomads with no purchasing power
 

Araabi

Awdalite
The French said you lied about your coastal territory and thats why your deal fell though. Gadabursi have farmers that why they werent as nomadic


View attachment 378296


Theres pictures of ciises living in saylac in 1890 just stop yapping your finished


View attachment 378299

Both the French and British signed treaties with the Gadabursi before they signed with the Issa.

Both powers:

Gadabursi British Treaty dated December 11th, 1884:
content.png

British Ciise Treaty dated 31st December, 1884:
Screenshot_20251119_213519_Samsung Internet.jpg



French Gadabursi Treaty dated March 25th 1885:
Screenshot_20251119_175952_Samsung Internet.jpg


French Issa Treaty, dated 26th March 1885:
Screenshot_20251119_213223_Samsung Internet.jpg


Both powers signed with the Gadabursi before the Issa. That was no accident. They knew the predominant community. Not a nomadic unsettled population that moves everything searching for rain.
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Thats because ciise allowed gadabursi to use saylac port. The British were clear when they said you had to cross ciise territory.

View attachment 378300

The British also clearly stated that Zeila port belonges to ciises and they mentioned our 600 huts in the city
View attachment 378302

The Gadabursi trade in Zeila was greater than the Ciise trade, when the European powers first came it was the Gadabursi they negotiated trade deals with:
Gadabuursi Zeila trade2.jpg
 
Both the French and British signed treaties with the Gadabursi before they signed with the Issa.

Both powers:

Gadabursi British Treaty dated December 11th, 1884:
View attachment 378303
British Ciise Treaty dated 31st December, 1884:
View attachment 378305


French Gadabursi Treaty dated March 25th 1885:
View attachment 378306

French Issa Treaty, dated 26th March 1885:
View attachment 378307

Both powers signed with the Gadabursi before the Issa. That was no accident. They knew the predominant community. Not a nomadic unsettled population that moves everything searching for rain.
Now your just yapping i have debunked all of your sources. The British and French governments said you were landlocked which was true.

The British signed that treaty about the The port of Zeila because gadabursi used come there for trade
1000017181.png
 

Araabi

Awdalite
Now your just yapping i have debunked all of your sources. The British and French governments said you were landlocked which was true.

The British signed that treaty about the The port of Zeila because gadabursi used come there for trade
View attachment 378309

Why would they sign with us before you unless they knew for a fact that you are only a nomadic population:
Screenshot_20251119_204331_Samsung Internet.jpg


So they signed with a population that only uses the ports and signed later with the population that owns the ports?

Lol, the mental gymnastics.
 
Top