You guys lost me with anti somali male rhetoric, it turned from valid criticisms to insults and generalizations. You guys seem to believe that Somali history began in 1991 when that is far from the case, Somali history dates thousands of years ago and is filled with instances of Somali male successes and inspiring male individuals. You have to wonder, would Somalia even be better off if the events that occurred following the civil war until now would be any better if it was women dominated? Hate to break it to you but they are no angels, they'd likely have been corrupt power hungry individuals as well.
We need good people, male and female to run society, we need to uplift each other with our problems rather than engage in "who is worse" arguments"
@PuntiteQueen @Alluring @KawhiLeonard
If you look at Somali history, nomadic Somali women had it very rough, they would have to build the "aqal", which is the dwelling, look after the children, cook and also milk the animals.
Somali nomadic women would also give birth alone without assistance.
Whereas Somali nomadic men didn't do much in or around the dwelling, he only engaged in warfare which was not that often or herding cattle. There was a Western historian who wrote about Somali nomadic men lazing around and tending to their appearance.
In addition to this, Somali women had to tolerate sharing their husband with multiple wives as they didn't have much access to making their own livelihoods.
There is not much evidence of Somali women being merchants or having access to other parts of society outside of child-rearing etc,
Somali men didn't suddenly inherit this need to marginalise women, this is an old tradition.