http://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/2013/01/normal-0-false-false-false.html?m=0
Read and leave your first impresions
Read and leave your first impresions
http://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/2013/01/normal-0-false-false-false.html?m=0
Read and leave your first impresions
A bunch of pictures of Bantu slaves from East Africa assimilated into Arab society.
Somali and their illiterate dhaqan. Read,not look at pictures. take sometime and read.A bunch of pictures of Bantu slaves from East Africa assimilated into Arab society.
All right lazy motherfuckers. Ill go and copy paste intresting partsSpoon feed me. Ain’t got time to read all that
This is biased Afrocentric crap, next. Nobody will take it seriously. The guy is simply using the descendants of African slaves to represent Arabs. Weak sauce..
From your avatar, it looks like you are a Hotep. Bad news buddy:
Ancient Egyptians were less Sub-Saharan African than today's Egyptians:
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
All the geneticists agree with me. Even modern-day Copts are less Sub-Saharan African than so-called ''Arab invader'' Egyptian Muslims because Muslims had Central African slaves while Coptic Egyptians didn't. That is the only invasion that actually happened to Egypt.
By geneticists you mean the Jewish owner of haplogroup.com?
You’re spreading propaganda
The same argument applies to Somalia.
Today's Somalia is much blacker and way more Sub-Saharan African on average than Ancient Somalia ~two millennia ago as Ancient Somalia did not have Bantu slaves like Modern Somalia does.
Same for Egypt.
You insulted (the family of the Prophet) because of their blackness (bi-l-sawad), while there are still deep black, pure-blooded Arabs. However, you are white – the Romans (Byzantines) have embellished your faces with their color. The color of the family of Hashim was not a bodily defect (aha).[From poem of Abu al-Hasan Ali b. al-Abbas b. Jurayj (Ibn al-Rumi) (d. 896), apud Abu al-Faraj al-Isbahani, Maqatil al-tãalibiyyin, 759] (Williams, 2009, p. 32). Al rumi was 13th century.Spoon feed me. Ain’t got time to read all that
More fake news
How is that possible when Somalis haven't intermarried with them? Or do you mean their presence in Somalia?@World can confirm.
There were no Bantus in Ancient Somalia. The median genetic average of Somalia two millennia ago was more Eurasian than today's Somalia.
Extrapolate that to Egypt. Same shit. They also had black slaves who pushed the country's median in a more Sub-Saharan direction.
Ibn Mandour- a North African of the 14th century and others also claimed most Arabs were dark brownish-black and kinky haired and tended to look down on fair-skin and straight or lank hair, as it was then seen as characteristic of "slaves" (Ibn Mandour, Lisaan al Arab IV:209).Spoon feed me. Ain’t got time to read all that
How is that possible when Somalis haven't intermarried with them? Or do you mean their presence in Somalia?
No one uttered bantu, Im talking afroasiatic:somali beja sudan habesh tuareg oromo ARABSame, both their presence and the fact that quite a few Somalis have intermarried with them. I have seen Bantu outliers in a study of Somalis sampled in Mogadishu.
In the case of Egypt, they completely absorbed them. There is no Afro-Egyptian community except for the Nubians and Beja who do not descend from slaves and have their own culture and community.
The Sub-Saharan African slaves in Egypt were absorbed by the Arabic speaking Muslim Egyptians and not by the Coptic Egyptians due to cultural/religious barriers.