Rhodesia would have been the first African first world country
- Thread starter haramcadd
- Start date
I blame the borders and corrupt government
OffTheDome
Proud American
This is just Salisbury (now Harare) the rest of the country was a shithole kkkkkk
That's like posting pics of pre-war Mogadishu and saying the country was great
It was still a shithole where a large part of the population was exploited, lived like shit and only a select group took all the wealth which they used.
It was still a shithole where a large part of the population was exploited, lived like shit and only a select group took all the wealth which they used.
Rhodesia was a racist project founded by the very Cecil Rhodes , a concept where Europeans would profit from the misfortune anyone that praises them are butt licking coons.
It's better to live in abject poverty than being subjected to a minority elite , imagine being a second/third class citizen in your own country, the media never showed the natives living in shacks and shantytowns , they didn't exist , the fancy buildings in Harare and the few state owned farms displayed by the neo-colonialists.
Mugabe was a lunatic but this is so far the best thing he's ever done , removing the parasites. Yes his administration went downhill paying a heavy price like many African leaders standing up against oppression , the sanctions put a burden in those countries but having dignity is far more worth.
South Africans are the opposites of Zimbabweans and I believe we still live in the legacy but combined cycles of prejudice, xenophobia , corruption, poverty and economic apartheid.
Somalia was once on the list for conquest of settlers we would have been annexed in 1917 the yahuud would have flocked in , the Brits conquered Palestine, but there were alternative habitable countries and we were included .
I can imagine what it would have been in an alternate timeline , some of you white praising coons would probably be among the Intifada matyrs.
Its best not to enjoy the suffering of others even if you despise them , outside Africa you're not different from a negroid
It's better to live in abject poverty than being subjected to a minority elite , imagine being a second/third class citizen in your own country, the media never showed the natives living in shacks and shantytowns , they didn't exist , the fancy buildings in Harare and the few state owned farms displayed by the neo-colonialists.
Mugabe was a lunatic but this is so far the best thing he's ever done , removing the parasites. Yes his administration went downhill paying a heavy price like many African leaders standing up against oppression , the sanctions put a burden in those countries but having dignity is far more worth.
South Africans are the opposites of Zimbabweans and I believe we still live in the legacy but combined cycles of prejudice, xenophobia , corruption, poverty and economic apartheid.
Somalia was once on the list for conquest of settlers we would have been annexed in 1917 the yahuud would have flocked in , the Brits conquered Palestine, but there were alternative habitable countries and we were included .
I can imagine what it would have been in an alternate timeline , some of you white praising coons would probably be among the Intifada matyrs.
Its best not to enjoy the suffering of others even if you despise them , outside Africa you're not different from a negroid
looks boring and cheaply made caadans have no taste lool
Trending
-
NSFW Breaking 🚨 conservative influencer Charlie Kirk shot in Utah
- Started by Chaseyourdreamzz
- Replies: 606
-
HISTORY look at how bad we got cucked by the italians.- Started by Bass
- Replies: 62
-
