I think some strange mixture of two types of people a couple of millennia back might explain this. I don't think the proto-Somalis were of one group, from a theoretical point of view (just for the conversation to find valid model alternatives to manipulate to fit what we're sitting with). Maybe one was highly Arab with partial Somali-like composition but population size-wise lower and then absorbed into tribes that had high exogamy intermarriages to distribute the frequency. This idea does not explain why there is a push and pull relationship between the Natufian and Arab proxies on the samples when using G25. Why is it that Somalis got high Sub-Saharan African amount compared to the Early Pastoral Neolithic who, if you remove the Mota-like forager stuff they received in the Horn, would be overwhelming non-African on a level beyond any extant Horner? Can it be that our ancestors mixed with Nilotic-like peoples post-migration into the Horn of Africa? Or were the early Cushitic-speakers more diverse because I don't think we directly descend from those Early Pastoral Neolithic (I understand we overlap a lot) indirectly? Is there a chance that the Mota-like ancestry was on an intermediate between Nilotic-like and East African hunter-gatherer, or a bit southern-shifted cline of Mota characterized by geography as we see in the studies?
Furthermore, we have established that Mota carried deep ancestry designated "Ghost modern" at 30%. This component seems to be ANA-like, probably with some level of drift. Hunter-gatherers at the OOA times until 20kya used to migrate long distances, so it makes sense the forager people admixed highly with the North African endemic portion of Iberomaurusian.
Lipson et al. 2022 (I recommend reading):
Below I'm using Ancient North African simulated coordinate extracted from Taforalt samples on Mota (not trying to model here, only parse out ANA which conveniently fits with the Ghost modern proportion):
The fact is, this model is silly if read directly with the central African rainforest hunter-gatherers (Mbuti) and southern African foragers (ZAF_2100BP), these I placed only to tease out the ANA.
The Mota-related and southern-African-related ancestry sources are inferred to split deeply along their respective lineages, meaning that, in some sense, they represent ‘ghost’ populations (without closely related sampled representatives).
The Mota-related genetics is very ancient and forms a partially important baseline for most of the Paleolithic diversity.
"Although it is not possible at present to estimate when and how quickly this three-way cline emerged, it must have post-dated both the emergence of the Mota-related lineage around 80–60 ka"