Map and classification of the Omo-Tana languages (the language group Somali is in), OC (Revised)

[Idilinaa]

I think my skepticism comes from the fact that If you look at the bulk of this list it becomes obvious that most of these lanaguges he's comparing in the omo-tana stuff are basically lamaguges that are right next to each other or would have been the source of slaves that are working in the jubba valley.


View attachment 376657



If you look at this picture and imagine the pre-oromo expansion range of these lanaguges then theyre basically the southern Ethiopia region which one of the prime sources of slaves .
View attachment 376658

I don’t agree with the Omo-Tana classification. There’s really no such thing as an “Omo-Tana language group” , these are simply closely related languages and dialects that branched off from a common source. Linguists such as M. Nuuh Ali and others have attributed the differences among them primarily to ecological separation and social interaction patterns that shaped their development over time.


The idea of a Southern Somali or Southern Ethiopian origin also makes little sense. It relies too heavily on the “least moves principle,” which assumes that the area with the greatest linguistic diversity must be the point of origin. However, this principle doesn’t hold true for many languages, Somali included.

As for the claim that slavery influenced dialect formation. I find that unconvincing as well. Some of the largest slave owners historically were Northern Somali speakers, not Southerners.

When people are adopted or assimilated into another community, they generally take on the language and dialect of that group; they don’t reshape or alter it significantly.

 

[Zak12]

which assumes that the area with the greatest linguistic diversity must be the point of origin.

That is a good point. For example its like claiming Semitic languages originated from Ethiopia as that branch is very diverse in that country.

Personally, I think the mere fact that Proto-Somalis had words for camel and used them is proof alone that they couldn't have come from the south. Not only are both that animal and the word geel itself heavily rooted to northern Somalia's environment, the only reason proto-Somalis managed to inhabit to much territory is because of camels.

 

[Idilinaa]

That is a good point. For example its like claiming Semitic languages originated from Ethiopia as that branch is very diverse in that country.

Personally, I think the mere fact that Proto-Somalis had words for camel and used them is proof alone that they couldn't have come from the south. Not only are both that animal and the word geel itself heavily rooted to northern Somalia's environment, the only reason proto-Somalis managed to inhabit to much territory is because of camels.

Very true.

When it comes to discussions about Somalis, it’s important to remember that many of the most popular narratives about our language, economy, or history often overlook basic common sense and contradict available evidence, largely due to bias. In other cases, people reach hasty conclusions based on insufficient data, rather than reserving judgment until more reliable information is available.

 

[Midas]

Very true.
View attachment 376697
View attachment 376696


When it comes to discussions about Somalis, it’s important to remember that many of the most popular narratives about our language, economy, or history often overlook basic common sense and contradict available evidence, largely due to bias. In other cases, people reach hasty conclusions based on insufficient data, rather than reserving judgment until more reliable information is available.

The fundamental underpinning narrative about somali history is that were newcomers and that everything about us must have some external source.

The biggest problem with all the theories on somali migrations into the horn is that we have no evidence for somalis mixing with another pouplation. Even the yammnya who were the first indo-europeans who basically expanded all over Europe and due to a combination of disease and warfare were able to completely replace the earlier pouplations in Northern europe still show huge amounts of non-indoeuropean ancestry


But somalis somehow show no evidence of this.

 

[Idilinaa]

The fundamental underpinning narrative about somali history is that were newcomers and that everything about us must have some external source.

The biggest problem with all the theories on somali migrations into the horn is that we have no evidence for somalis mixing with another pouplation. Even the yammnya who were the first indo-europeans who basically expanded all over Europe and due to a combination of disease and warfare were able to completely replace the earlier pouplations in Northern europe still show huge amounts of non-indoeuropean ancestry


But somalis somehow show no evidence of this.

There is also no material and archeological evidence left behind to support that particular Somali migration theory, that they are new comers. Nor any substratum linguistically either of any other group pre-dating us in our current homeland.

As Herbert Lewis and Said Shidad pointed out while examining the textual records from ancient period to our modern era, the descriptions points to a basic population continuity.

 

[Midas]

There is also no material and archeological evidence left behind to support that particular Somali migration theory, that they are new comers. Nor any substratum linguistically either of any other group pre-dating us in our current homeland.

As Herbert Lewis and Said Shidad pointed out while examining the textual records from ancient period to our modern era, the descriptions points to a basic population continuity.

Plus we also have this massive geographical barrier called the danakil desert which is one of the one of tje hottest places on earth with Dalol having the highest avg temperature ever recorded on earth.
There was probably nobody living here for before the domestication of camels since it wasn't a place humans could survive .