Oh that one, My badBruh check the first image, it says 720 CE.
Bro believe im not lying but wallahi Ive seen in a book that this was a misread. Everything Ive read on Xamar I never save because its pointless, southern history is just too blurry and there are no native texts about the history like for the north
As for the source that all these europeans are quoting its in De Barros Decades de Asia, sub title is "a chronicle of the kings of this city"
Basically the portuguese captured Kilwa in the early 16th century, and copied a book that they had found there, the book was a variant of Kitab al Sulwa and contained the whole story about Fakr al Din and the Al Ahsa tribe and the arabs etc etc, but this same story can also be found in Kitab Al Zunuj, and this is the only documentation of the founding of the city we have around the 800-900ADs, I tried disproving this but the only thing you can counter this with is chittick saying that he found no traces of the city prior to the 12th century
I only vaguely remember all this because I tried disproving these stories myself one day, Im too lazy to start researching all these manuscripts and books just to argue with the other idiots in this thread, waste of energy but if you really want to disprove the arab origins of mogadishu this is what you need to read :
De Barros Decades de Asia (1552)
Kitab al Sulwa
Kitab Al Zunuj
And theres chances that this story is present in more swahili manuscripts cause swahilis have over 30 000 manuscripts on their history, compared to banadir which has none, one of them even says the arabs of pate conquered mogadishu and many other things
If you manage to find a way to disprove the fakhr al din story and the rest, which I could not do, then you basically debunked the foreign origins
Wsc Im not gonna waste my time on this any longer, this isnt my taarikh