Not 60% lol someone made a thread on here the average they get. The highest they could go is 60% but the average is 50-55% while Somalis get an average 45%.Yes this looks correct but G25 isn’t completely accurate some of the distances are completely wrong.
Eritreans are significantly more Eurasian than Somalis, as they are about 60% compared to Somalis 45%, they don’t have “extra African genes”.
View attachment 308968
Here’s a good qpadm model on Eritreans, this shows they are roughly a third Yemeni Mahra relative to Somalis which is pretty significant.
View attachment 308969
View attachment 308970
View attachment 308971View attachment 308972 These are Eritreans Fst distances which is a measure of population differentiation due to genetic structure and this is measured by the variance of allele frequencies between the populations, this is a way better and more robust measure of genetic of distance than G25.
That depends on the Eritrean since Eritrean isn't a single ethnicity and consists of many groups including literal Arabs. In general though Habesha do shift towards Eurasians whereas Somalis shift to Africans since the former is over 50% Eurasian while the latter is less than 50%. Not that it matters since Horners cluster pretty tightly and no one remotely plots close to any MENA group (aside from maybe Mozabite Berbers) let alone Europeans.Somalis
View attachment 308966
eritreans
View attachment 308967
Basically eritreans are more likely to be closer to Europeans then other Africans while Somalis are more likely to be closer to other African then Europeans ?
I thought habesha with extra African genes made them closer to African then mena people ?
Its not Nilotic, its Dinka like ancestry. The idea that we have Nilotic DNA is a myth.So we score higher Nilotic
I know the average habesha from highland Eritreans all to ahmara get 50-55% eursian due to early mix from Sudan and extra south Arabian.That depends on the Eritrean since Eritrean isn't a single ethnicity and consists of many groups including literal Arabs. In general though Habesha do shift towards Eurasians whereas Somalis shift to Africans since the former is over 50% Eurasian while the latter is less than 50%. Not that it matters since Horners cluster pretty tightly and no one remotely plots close to any MENA group (aside from maybe Mozabite Berbers) let alone Europeans.
That means I’m also related to @NiloticIts not Nilotic, its Dinka like ancestry. The idea that we have Nilotic DNA is a myth.
It is 60%, most studies in recent years that estimate Eurasian ancestry in Eritreans/North Ethiopians will say they are 55-65% EurasianNot 60% lol someone made a thread on here the average they get. The highest they could go is 60% but the average is 50-55% while Somalis get an average 45%.
Yes habesha people have some Omotic/Mota-like ancestry but it’s not significant at all in Eritreans and overall they have less Sub Saharan African ancestryYes habesha has extra genes (someone said it in here ) but I think it’s called the omatic something like that + Nilotic while Somali only got Nilotic. So we score higher Nilotic but they score higher omatic and eursian.
Usually due to mixing with Arabs and or south AsiansWhat about does Somali who hit above 50% how did they get those extra eursian genes unlike other Somalis such Kenyan Somali for example (which is the lowest if I’m correct? )
Can you link me to some studies? Most I've read say 50-55%.will say they are 55-65% Eurasian
Arabs I could understand but south Asian ? Unless if you’re reer xamar then no.Usually due to mixing with Arabs and or south Asians
The standard for Ethiopian Semites is 20-30% South Arabian DNA, with an average of ~25%.Can you link me to some studies? Most I've read say 50-55%.
Not in a true sense, if we're speaking scientifically. In a true sense, even the African part of us split from West Africans 10,000 years or so before Eurasians and our East African DNA split. There is just something weird with models that do not take into account the drift of Africans despite the higher differentiation between African groups. And also that non-Africans had weird drift after they ventured out.Chart shows we are closer to west africans then europeans, beesha trolls need to explains
Viva mama Africa indeed kkkk
No lol Tigrinya speakers in Eritrea and Tigray and probably Tigres aswell go back to the same group who was the main base for the original Habesha not Amhara, Amhara adopted the term way later than North Ethio Semitic people. Amhara have no direct connection to Axum there affinity with the kingdom is largely due to the southward shift that happened during the decline of the empire so they absorbed some Axumite ancestry, also they mixed with Agaw/Zagwe people who have a closer connection to Axum than Amhara but ultimately not a single Axumite site has been discovered in Amhara, literally not a single one. And linguist place South Ethio Semitic south of Tigray pretty early on, during D’mt even so Amhara were at best a peripheral people who adopted Axumite culture and identity.The Amharas and Tigray go back to the same group who potentially was the main base for what we call "Habash" but go to Eritrea and things get complicated.
A lot of trolls like to manipulate coordinates to make Somalis seem more Eurasian and they pass them off as if they’re legitChart shows we are closer to west africans then europeans, beesha trolls need to explains
I thought we are more closer to North Africans/Middle East than West Africa? Only the Beni Amer and Beja are more than 60%. According to illustrative, Gedmatch and other studies tigrinyas and Afars are 55% on Average and Amharas are 50% on average.A lot of trolls like to manipulate coordinates to make Somalis seem more Eurasian and they pass them off as if they’re legit
It’s interesting because beni amer kinda looks Somalis even tho they’ve high eursian bloodI thought we are more closer to North Africans/Middle East than West Africa? Only the Beni Amer and Beja are more than 60%. According to illustrative, Gedmatch and other studies tigrinyas and Afars are 55% on Average and Amharas are 50% on average.
We are as the original post made clear.I thought we are more closer to North Africans/Middle East than West Africa? Only the Beni Amer and Beja are more than 60%. According to illustrative, Gedmatch and other studies tigrinyas and Afars are 55% on Average and Amharas are 50% on average.