So you will take care of another mans kids financially if your sister gets divorced, but not your own kids if you divorce your wife? You’re a loser.
In a Sharia court those children will go the man so no I don't have to, as for my own children I don't plan on having them here anyway, so your question doesn't even apply to me.
This forum is a great reflection why I would never raise children here because the nanny state takes full control and authority over them with free reign of satanic indoctrination, as a father allowing this to happen is the ultimate disservice to my children for which I will be judged upon.
I will provide the same education and protection that I was fortunate enough to have been granted myself so that I didn't end up like you questioning the the wisdom of Allah.
Why the hell would a woman leave her children in the hands of another woman just to get remarried? If you think it’s okay for sharia courts to take children of women and hand them to their father just because she chooses to leave him then you should go back to the old ages. That’s oppression!
Coming against the laws of your creator takes you out of the fold of Islam which doesn't surprise me to much on sspot, seeing your whole pro transgenderism poison you been spewing across this forum was already suspect.
It's also why I would neither raise kids her nor marry any women from here, only an insane man would do this, your diatribe laced post only proves my point.
Secondly do you really think men these days bear much responsibilities? Even you yourself talk a big game but I’m pretty sure in reality you don’t do much for your family.
No to your first statement because they are raised in filth no different from you by irresponsible parents and as for your second statement that's pure slander from you.
The nanny state takes care of the needy because men don’t want to take care of their families. Baqti men like yourself force their wives to claim that they are unmarried so he doesn’t have to pay anything and makes his children appear like bastards.
More and more slander, show me exactly where I claim this? if anything I oppose any sane man from marrying women in the diaspora and leave them all to the Ajanabi's which I am on record reiterating many times on here.
Detoxing a Xalimo that has drank for a decade from that poisonous well embroiled deeply into materialism, doubt and exceeding love for worldly life is a mission impossible that could break your back.
You’re actually bragging about men in 3rd world countries (and I say that because it only happens there) being able to remarry easier with children than women as if that’s something to be proud of and don’t see the inequality in that.
That's just the nature of man the same way the lion kills all the baby cubs of his rival to bring the female into season. Whether you take the scientific materialist view (a lot worse) or the rational view of present times, no man is willing to take care of children that don't belong to him.
A solution is required, idealism alone is not going to cut it, what's best for the children? what's best for everyone ? society has come up with a plan and Allah has provided a solution, we already know how devastating the solution of the nanny state has been thus far.
Muslims just need to get with the times and put the Quran and Hadith in context with the modern times.
What you are really saying is that Allah didn't know what would transpire in the 21st century and only knew about the events that would transpire in the 7th century and therefore his message is incomplete requiring interpolation, you have opened the gateways of Kufr without even knowing.
You remind me of those crazy people who take the Quran out of context and go around killing people because the Quran says “slay them wherever they may be” not realising that verse came out in a time of war between the early generations of Muslims who were fighting for their rights in an age where you had to fight in order to get rights and the kuffar.
Conjecture, I am a student of the Quran, not a day goes past without going through an hour of Tasfeer from classical scholars, to postulate such a thing is absolute nonsense, bring me proof were you have ever seen me support Kharijiite groups which I regularly attack on here.
People like you take Islam out of context and don’t try and take lessons from it in context to the world we live in today because you’re a sexist loser who thinks women are your property and you deserve a certain type of woman even if you aren’t that certain type of man yourself.
Allah's message is universal for all ages and to suggest it isn't is to imply he "didn't know" the circumstances of the 21st century which is kufr by unanimous consensus if you hold that belief.
Your comments reminds me of those Christian's that keep changing their already corrupt scriptures every decade or so to fit in with so called 'modern' times.
Sexist is a western term not in my dictionary, if by that you imply I should bend my faith to suit this satanic modern revolution then I take that label with pride.
The Prophet (PBUH) said the last people that will come out to "Dajjal" will be women, it was theorised that in this Dajjalic age we live in, this would be the modern "feminist" revolution, as all the other Dajjalic systems are already in place from finance all the way down to the agricultural monsanto seeds run by the same occult bloodlines.
In another hadith a time will come when the husband will be forced to use coercion so his wife doesn't go out to Dajjal, another hadith states that the majority of Dajjal followers will be women when he physically appears.
I know the likes of you very well and your temperament, had plenty of experience with them before, I actually feel sorry for you, there will come a time you'll remember my words.
