Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
Nigga send screenshots of the book
I ain't going search for unaccessible links
Don't you see me sharing the pages? Why can't you lol
Is anyone else angry Somali history before colonization is not well known?
- Thread starter DangerBadan
- Start date
I ain't going search for unaccessible links
Don't you see me sharing the pages? Why can't you lol
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
bros tweaking. he's citing a guy who believed Ahmed gurey was Somali.
Somalis were not the majority in the malasaay or Adal. Somalis didn't even constitute half of the fighting force. "The jihadic wars of the
sixteenth century are presented as the work of the fanatic nomads. It is true that the nomads played an important part in the jihad between
1529-1531*. Even then, they did not constitute half of the fighting material. After that their role in the war progressively declined.
On the other hand, the farmers of Harar were engaged in the jihadic wars between 1529 and 1577 such an extent that they were exhausted, devasated and forced to abandon their means of livelihood. Most Somali nomads didn't even want to join the Jihad against abyssinia. Imam Ahmed spent a large amount of his time fighting Somali Nomads." Somalis only spent two years fighting and got exhausted. The Oxford journal you showed me was refuted by many prominent intellectual scholars. It was an opinion rather than an established fact.
Once again you decontextualized the Malassay following Somalis. OMG. It has nothing to do with Somalis being the majority. Did you even read the full context.
Read THE OROMO OF ETHIOPIA, 1500-1850 : WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE GIBE REGION by Mohammed Hassen. He goes into great detail about the Muslim and Christian struggle in Ethiopia. Most of his sources are actually from Futush-al-Habesh. It's really informative.
Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
As much as i know you're an ignorant i will share it one more timeSomalis were not the majority in the malasaay or Adal. Somalis didn't even constitute half of the fighting force. "The jihadic wars of the
sixteenth century are presented as the work of the fanatic nomads. It is true that the nomads played an important part in the jihad between
1529-1531*. Even then, they did not constitute half of the fighting material. After that their role in the war progressively declined.
On the other hand, the farmers of Harar were engaged in the jihadic wars between 1529 and 1577 such an extent that they were exhausted, devasated and forced to abandon their means of livelihood. Most Somali nomads didn't even want to join the Jihad against abyssinia. Imam Ahmed spent a large amount of his time fighting Somali Nomads." Somalis only spent two years fighting and got exhausted. The Oxford journal you showed me was refuted by many prominent intellectual scholars. It was an opinion rather than an established fact.
A reliable academical source from Oxford
Says somalis were the majority
Are you going to deny this too? If so i can't help
Attachments
Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
It was a meeting between somalis
Read the text first lol
Majority of Malassay were somalis bro dang just admit it
Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
Isn't it a reliable academical source from the world's best university?You are sharing the same source
Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
Oromo?
He cites Futush al Habesh in most of his sources. You can see the sources in the bottom of every paragraph. He even cities many great scholars and geographers such as Masudi and Umari.
Somali_patriotic
Everything unuka leh
The title itself is enough of evidence
The nga main objective wasn't even who wuz adal and who wasn't
You're making his side commentaries look like Great sources smh
Somali nomads did play a role in the jihad against abyssinia. No one denies that. But to say they were the majority fighting force for Imam Ahmed is a blatant disregard for historical accuracy. Okay, for the sake of argument, Malasay are Somali. What does Malasay mean in af Somali? Why were Malasay and Somalis separated and described differently in Futush-al-Habesh? Why did Imam Ahmed have to send spies to observe his own people? Imam Ahmed trusted Malasay. That's because Somali Nomads were very treacherous. Malasay following Somalis doesn't prove shit
.He doesn't give his own opinions. Everything he has compiled is from Futush-al-Habesh, intellectual scholars and archeological evidence. So futush al Habesh is not enough evidence. Statements from scholars such as Al Umari and masadui is not enough evidence? Come bro you could do better than that.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
who is Imam ahmeds brother-in law?Somali nomads did play a role in the jihad against abyssinia. No one denies that. But to say they were the majority fighting force for Imam Ahmed is a blatant disregard for historical accuracy. Okay, for the sake of argument, Malasay are Somali. What does Malasay mean in af Somali? Why were Malasay and Somalis separated and described differently in Futush-al-Habesh? Why did Imam Ahmed have to send spies to observe his own people? Imam Ahmed trusted Malasay. That's because Somali Nomads were very treacherous. Malasay following Somalis doesn't prove shit
We wuz kangs and sheet. Take care and doing extensive reading on this topic. Wallahi it will change your opinion.
. Take care and doing extensive reading on this topic. Wallahi it will change your opinion.
Khaem
VIP
The cope from this man in the face of the sources he just brings up load of bs and somehow not a single one of them can he bring a screenshot of what he's talking about. This is a certified Habasha niggaWe wuz kangs and sheet
Crying over the greatness of the Somali race won't rebuild all those churches we burnt down habash.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
A Somali commander killed the first born son of Dawit II. your doing everything ti avoid talking aboit primary sources which reference Somalis more than any other ethnicityWe wuz kangs and sheet
Sharif Aidarus is not a source correct? Did you even read the book lol. I literally screenshot the excat words of sharif aidarus.
THE OROMO OF ETHIOPIA, 1500-1850 : WITH SPECIAL with a special emphasis on the given region is not a source correct?
The conquest of absynnnia by sihab ad din isn't a source correct.
