Thats incorrect. European Meds are clearly White. They're kin to other fellow Europeans in the East & North.The white race consists of Celts and Germanic people - they cling to Mediterranean and Near Eastern history to account for the lack of any meaningful civilization in western or northern Europe until King Arthur
P.S. KANGS
What's wrong with you people. @Yahya say's "WUZ" and not one person replies back with "KANGZ". Instead you all begin replying and broke the chain.
I'm genuinely disappointed.
Thats incorrect. European Meds are clearly White. They're kin to other fellow Europeans in the East & North.
Middle-Eastern/Near-eastern Meds are not White.
Everybody defines white as different things since there is no objective ''white'' group which is why saying ''white people'' and ''black people'' is it really hard to say European.Thats incorrect. European Meds are clearly White. They're kin to other fellow Europeans in the East & North.
Middle-Eastern/Near-eastern Meds are not White.
Generally in the West, White=European. Thats the accepted definition over here.Everybody defines white as different things since there is no objective ''white'' group which is why saying ''white people'' and ''black people'' is it really hard to say European.
People should stop using that term in my opinion.Generally in the West, White=European. Thats the accepted definition over here.
Thats incorrect. European Meds are clearly White. They're kin to other fellow Europeans in the East & North.
Middle-Eastern/Near-eastern Meds are not White & have nothing to do with South Europeans.
People should stop using that term in my opinion.
I disagree, some South Italians & Greeks may be tanned, but they're still of European stock.I said blonde hair also. Seti was rameses father and seti m
Based on genetics they are white but culturally their more akin to middle eastern people, thats why northern white italians look down on the southern olive skin italians and greeks
It's an dumb word and very easy to use because all they do is check the skin-color, using continents as a way to identify people would be so much more respectable.Wish people used European, African, and East Asian as racial terms instead of these dumb colors. Most Europeans aren't even literally white, more like a peach color.
It's an dumb word and very easy to use because all they do is check the skin-color, using continents as a way to identify people would be so much more respectable.
He's Asian
He's African
He's European
He's South Amercican
He's North American
should be the default.
South American would definitely not work.Lol, South American may work because of the widespread Latino look, but North Americans have no common look.
Which is why you should specify ethnicites while talking about north americans.Lol, South American may work because of the widespread Latino look, but North Americans have no common look.
I actually agree with you on the need for more specific/accurate labels. However, going off by continents would not work in most cases, such as "African" and "Asian".It's an dumb word and very easy to use because all they do is check the skin-color, using continents as a way to identify people would be so much more respectable.
He's Asian
He's African
He's European
He's South Amercican
He's North American
should be the default.
South American would definitely not work.
The continent is way too diverse racially.
I disagree, some South Italians & Greeks may be tanned, but they're still of European stock.
Culturally, they're obviously closer to other Euros(Northerners and Easterners) due to shared indo-European heritage.
Continents is the better option but you should specify when talking about somebody.I actually agree with you on the need for more specific/accurate labels. However, going off by continents would not work in most cases, such as "African" and "Asian".