No, but being logically consistent in the manner required by science extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so far must religions fail not only to provide such evidence but even comport with basic understandings of the world.
The most logical position to hold would be agnostic atheist allowing for the discovery of a God figure.
Basically, the burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim. I understand. I love your rational thinking. But, I believe there are atheists who are out there that are facading atheism to scientism. Because science is ever-changing, religious folks may see this as bad, but it's actually good. I'm an empathetic person, I can put myself in your shoes. I also believe the answers are in the questions. I really dont know where
@VixR stands, but if she believes in the Hitchens razor, then there's a light, If not then its nihilism.
The fact is we dont know, And if you disagree then there is no need for me to waste my time. We do not know what's beyond this reality. If someone tells me they seen a man levitate,
I'm a huge fan of the quantum physics field world, and recently it seems they have been hitting what I call alchemy. The Peculiar Math That Could Underlie the Laws of Nature
New findings are fueling an old suspicion that fundamental particles and forces spring from strange eight-part numbers called “octonions.” Now I'm, not a physicist but I do remember some calculus.
From what I understood, In the article, Cohl Furey uses a sum of a nested summation requiring an ellipsis(its a very common notion or math you could say). This should tell you how science is ever changing.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-octonion-math-that-could-underpin-physics-20180720/