Epidemic of single Somali women

Sophisticate

~Gallantly Gadabuursi~
Staff Member
Lol, epidemic implies a disease. :ftw9nwa:

There is nothing aberrant about being single.

I'm having an Sspot party and only inviting my chronically single friends. @Wervelwind and @DangerBadan must attend. I'm not here to change your status but to observe incessant marriage talks from team shot gun vs team run-away. @Khad2023 will have endless Perrier avaliable to maintain sobriety. I'll host. And guard the door because some individuals are in between spouses or looking for a spare. Like @Grigori Rasputin.
Watching Season 10 GIF by One Chicago
 
Every thread on gender on this site is 10+ pages wtf

Just constant calacal and female hormones polluting these threads, no benefit
 
It isnt such a lie. Conditions are today that your average worker in many big cities isnt even better off then room and board just this time likely without a husband and kids and some huge debt and work laws are still amazingly harsh
Work laws aren’t know where near as harsh. You have weekend pay, severance pay, sick leave, shortened work hours, free health care in society and the list goes on.
I can’t be bothered to go into detail but please read about life just after the industrial revolution in big cities in the UK. It was horrifying. Read it and then comment. It was the blood, sweat and tears of the working class and though the formation of trade unionism as to why we have weekends off, why we have sensible work hours and from 6am-8pm, why we don’t have child labour and the list goes on. The living conditions were also horrible. Google the East end in the 1800s.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Read historical accounts.
 
Lol, epidemic implies a disease. :ftw9nwa:

There is nothing aberrant about being single.

I'm having an Sspot party and only inviting my chronically single friends. @Wervelwind and @DangerBadan must attend. I'm not here to change your status but to observe incessant marriage talks from team shot gun vs team run-away. @Khad2023 will have endless Perrier avaliable to maintain sobriety. I'll host. And guard the door because some individuals are in between spouses or looking for a spare. Like @Grigori Rasputin.
Watching Season 10 GIF by One Chicago
Your voyeurism will be averted by me, you will not find enjoyment from the chronically wasmo la'aan
 
Work laws aren’t know where near as harsh. You have weekend pay, severance pay, sick leave, shortened work hours, free health care in society and the list goes on.
I can’t be bothered to go into detail but please read about life just after the industrial revolution in big cities in the UK. It was horrifying. Read it and then comment. It was the blood, sweat and tears of the working class and though the formation of trade unionism as to why we have weekends off, why we have sensible work hours and from 6am-8pm, why we don’t have child labour and the list goes on. The living conditions were also horrible. Google the East end in the 1800s.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Read historical accounts.
On this point I just wanted to mention that, no prosperity exists without torture and suffering of some people, so I know this is completely irrelevant to the thread, But I do not understand, why everyone is so obsessed with being happy and living a good life, without pain and suffering, when it is virtually impossible, and all our ease and opulence is hinged on the suffering of other people, and even then we still suffer, when you look at history, everyone lived painful difficult lives, since you have read alot about history, I would like to ask you, do you believe happiness or an easy life is a realistic goal, do you think that most people in history were happy, and do you believe the natural state of man is a positive or negative one, and what are your views and the majority of our history having some kind of pain and suffering going on that would make us question how they even enjoyed living life?
 

attash

Amaan Duule
@Odious Delirium and the rest

This is my analysis. Someone on twitter worded it perfectly:

View attachment 292632

View attachment 292634

View attachment 292635
The idea that you have to be a "good man" in order to get women is such a joke. There are so many terrible men who get play, including and especially in the West. People never needed good morals in order to attain wealth, power, women, and other pleasures of the dunya.

Anyways, the reason why there are so many lonely men is because they'd rather get their pleasure from the women on their screens than actually go outside and talk to real-life women.
 
Work laws aren’t know where near as harsh. You have weekend pay, severance pay, sick leave, shortened work hours, free health care in society and the list goes on.
I can’t be bothered to go into detail but please read about life just after the industrial revolution in big cities in the UK. It was horrifying. Read it and then comment. It was the blood, sweat and tears of the working class and though the formation of trade unionism as to why we have weekends off, why we have sensible work hours and from 6am-8pm, why we don’t have child labour and the list goes on. The living conditions were also horrible. Google the East end in the 1800s.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Read historical accounts.
Ah the great redistribution argument. I say if they didnt redistubte any wealth away from the wealthy which we all know by accounts that inequality has never been higher and the wealthiest enjoy the biggest share of overall global wealth they ever have enjoyed who did they distribute it from? Thats right. From your husband to you, from your child to your husband, from your huband to your child and took an admin fee for the pleasure (you do have to give it to the wealthy for their canniness) and thats before they redistibuted it from some poor soul in africa to you that would have otherwise been able to enjoy a decent dinner. Its akin to when women joined the workforce and expected the business owner to payout more of his profits but he instead just split the 100 he was already just giving the husband among the wife and husband and got double the labour at the same price (guess where needing two salaries to own a home and raise a family came from when it only used to be one). Ill read the article but its very unlikely any of those changes came at free gains to people. Extra benefits would come at lower wages, healthcare at extra tax essentially all translating to more time at the workplace for people hence likely why the official retirement age of most people will probably be 80 by the time its all said and done and thats if pensions havent blown up by then (uk did come close with truss), and we havent even gone into the national debt where every new child owes over like 100k from birth (paying that back will take some extra diluting of wages). All in all you could be worse off then the poor maid or carpenter
 
The idea that you have to be a "good man" in order to get women is such a joke. There are so many terrible men who get play, including and especially in the West. People never needed good morals in order to attain wealth, power, women, and other pleasures of the dunya.

Anyways, the reason why there are so many lonely men is because they'd rather get their pleasure from the women on their screens than actually go outside and talk to real-life women.
i dont believe they would prefer, i think they find it too difficult, and just settle with it bc they cba to try because they have always failed
 
This is a universal (West) thing, late 20 to mid 30 is the norm as it’s the age where you’re likely to be financially secured.

I’m 30s and have been pressured as well but the negative outweighed the positive unfortunately. I just can’t afford to cover “extra” basic necessities for the family, petrol, education, hobby etc.

Just simply not falling for my parent’s trap who have the mentality of the past, doesn’t think about their kids situation and high the cost of living.
 
This is a universal (West) thing, late 20 to mid 30 is the norm as it’s the age where you’re likely to be financially secured.

I’m 30s and have been pressured as well but the negative outweighed the positive unfortunately. I just can’t afford to cover “extra” basic necessities for the family, petrol, education, hobby etc.

Just simply not falling for my parent’s trap who have the mentality of the past, doesn’t think about their kids situation and high the cost of living.
The issue is everyone is basically broke if they don't have disposal income after family, petrol, education etc
Looks like a lot of people have anxiety, depression etc because there broke when we take Into account the current standards of living
 
The idea that you have to be a "good man" in order to get women is such a joke. There are so many terrible men who get play, including and especially in the West. People never needed good morals in order to attain wealth, power, women, and other pleasures of the dunya.
Yes, there are but at the same time the average woman ain’t marrying the average man for provision or power. Also you do know that terrible men mask their terribleness in the beginning?! Also terrible men can’t retain women. That’s what men forgot. They attract women via deception and then once their real character comes out, women file for divorce.

So yes, being a good man is the way in which you get and keep women. Also, look at terrible men like drug dealers and other men in murky situations, what type of women are they getting? Do you honestly think that those men are getting the type
Of women the average man values? No.
Various studies show the type of characters of men women value. Altruism, openness and generosity

Anyways, the reason why there are so many lonely men is because they'd rather get their pleasure from the women on their screens than actually go outside and talk to real-life women.
No, they don’t ‘rather’ be right someone online. Many don’t have the skills or the ability of socialize and anxiety and other issues are one the rise. If men had a preference for that we wouldn’t be getting a lot of dialogue about lonely men, the rise in redpill and incels shooting up places.
 
Last edited:
Ah the great redistribution argument. I say if they didnt redistubte any wealth away from the wealthy which we all know by accounts that inequality has never been higher and the wealthiest enjoy the biggest share of overall global wealth they ever have enjoyed who did they distribute it from? Thats right. From your husband to you, from your child to your husband, from your huband to your child and took an admin fee for the pleasure (you do have to give it to the wealthy for their canniness) and thats before they redistibuted it from some poor soul in africa to you that would have otherwise been able to enjoy a decent dinner. Its akin to when women joined the workforce and expected the business owner to payout more of his profits but he instead just split the 100 he was already just giving the husband among the wife and husband and got double the labour at the same price (guess where needing two salaries to own a home and raise a family came from when it only used to be one). Ill read the article but its very unlikely any of those changes came at free gains to people. Extra benefits would come at lower wages, healthcare at extra tax essentially all translating to more time at the workplace for people hence likely why the official retirement age of most people will probably be 80 by the time its all said and done and thats if pensions havent blown up by then (uk did come close with truss), and we havent even gone into the national debt where every new child owes over like 100k from birth (paying that back will take some extra diluting of wages). All in all you could be worse off then the poor maid or carpenter
‘Could of would off’ isn’t thepoint here. What is a fact that of now is that the conditions of work is 10x better than the past. Actually read about work conditions and the law surrounding works for the working class before commenting.

People didn’t didn’t spend less time at work. That is inaccurate. What are you on about? Do you honestly think poor working class people worked 9-5 at factories? Do you honestly think working class people got Friday’s off like they now do at a lot of companies?

You literally have more free time than your ancestors could. Like I said actually read up work life in the past. There is no point debating if you can’t even acknowledge basic historical facts.
 
You definitely don't read any of the available studies on this matter
Yes I have. You don’t and you’re a liar. What studies show that Zina has increased form the 90s?! I hate it when people try and argue with me over facts. Are you sitting there trying to tell me that there is more Zina now than the 2000s when celibacy is at an all time high since the 90s and early 2000s!

Don’t argue with me for the sake of it. Unless you post studies that show Zina has increased since the 90s, don’t @ me. I can’t stand attention seekers who are so loud and wrong.
 

Juke

Asagu/Asaga
VIP
Yes I have. You don’t and you’re a liar. What studies show that Zina has increased form the 90s?! I hate it when people try and argue with me over facts. Are you sitting there trying to tell me that there is more Zina now than the 2000s when celibacy is at an all time high since the 90s and early 2000s!

Don’t argue with me for the sake of it. Unless you post studies that show Zina has increased since the 90s, don’t @ me. I can’t stand attention seekers who are so loud and wrong.
Self-reported data is trash. Rising STD rates are much better indicators.
 
There's a lot of single Muslims in general. There's many reasons for that. I say, focus on your Deen, because everyone isn't guaranteed a spouse. But Noone will be single In jannah.
No, I'm not discouraging pursuing a spouse, just saying don't let the lack of one get you down/depressed, etc.
 

Trending

Top