Daniel Haqiqatjou and "Red Pill"

@Omar del Sur no one takes madkhalis seriously anymore. And no one speaks of Salafis, but madkhalis. You know exactly how they support/protecting liberalism, by supporting gulf leaders who support liberalism and secularism.

Really it is not leadership it is only MBS/MBZ/Sisi they protect, any leader that opposes them they think is good to attack and topple. Basically, they only support Zionist aligned leaders who advance liberalism/secularism and fight Muslims.


They have been thoroughly exposed over the years.


 
EXPOSED: Jahil North and Saajid circulate fake quotes of religious texts

https://twitter.com/KnowledgeNorth/status/1678638815320109059…

Jahil North is a shameless open liar and Madkhali government agent, whose falsehoods are now being definitively exposed.

In one of his lie-filled videos attacking me, and accusing me of terrorism, he attributed a fake quote to Ibn Taymiyya.

The quote states that before one can criticize violations of the Sharia one must be a scholar.

This quote was used to support the Madkhali position that only "scholars" can criticize violations of the Sharia by particular Gulf governments (e.g., on social media).

(It is also tacitly assumed by Madkhalis that someone cannot be a scholar unless he is a member of their sect and allied with particular Gulf governments; Anyone else is a "deviant" or "khariji" regardless of their credentials; also anyone jailed by a Gulf government immediately loses his status as a scholar regardless of his credentials).

Jahil North first claimed that the preceding quote came from Ibn Taymiyya's Majmu'a al-Fatawa - but suspiciously did not provide an accurate reference in his video.

See
https://twitter.com/yusefren/status/1678247693737660416…

Once this lie was exposed, Jahil North promised to provide a source for the quote within a day. He also randomly accused the person who exposed his lie of being a terrorist and member of ISIS.

https://twitter.com/KnowledgeNorth/status/1678287830928302080…

Now that 24 hours have passed, Jahil North is claiming that he will provide a source for the video at some time in the future "if Allah wills."

He says that he must first visit a particular Gulf country to consult with Government scholars there. He also suggests that the quote is likely found in an unknown unpublished Ibn Taymiyya manuscript.

https://twitter.com/KnowledgeNorth/status/1678639230996688897…

Jahil North's video has been constantly promoted by other Madkhalis like Saajid.

This video should be immediately taken down given that it is filled with lies, including the fake quote attributed to Ibn Taymiyya to support particular Gulf governments. It is disgusting to make up and circulate fake quotes just to advance a government agenda.

How can someone who fakes quotes for propaganda purposes be considered a reliable source of knowledge?

Saajid should condemn the video and Jahil North. If he does not, it is simply additional evidence that he is, like that fool, a liar and a government agent.

 
Sh al-Albani rahimahullah SLAMS the secret police and those Muslims who work with the secret police.

Madkhalis, please reconcile this clear statement of the respected shaykh with your work with these governments to report and entrap Muslims.

TRANSLATION:

Q: Shaykh there is someone in our country who says it is permitted to inform the secret police on people who are thought to belong to certain groups [i.e., disfavored political groups] ; or on people who are believed with certainty to belong to certain groups. With the aim of showing support for the ruler, and [on the belief] that this is the way of the Salaf. What is your opinion?

A: My opinion is when something is based on what is wrong - it is wrong. Does an Islamic government use secret police?

Q: No

A: The best answer is that which is short and gives guidance. This is a disaster – to try and justify violations [of the Sharia] by saying : ‘This is what the ruler wants.’


 
I know many brothers in America who thought they were madkhali but recently realized they want nothing to do with that stupid cult of bid'a.

They mistakenly thought being madkhali means not engaging in violent rebellion. Actually, most ulama, salafi and non-salafi, have this position. That's not what being madkhali means.

Being madkhali means having the unprecedented bid'a position that it is impermissible to ever criticize any Muslim ruler for any reason (in practice, they only mean gulf rulers, because they themselves criticize rulers they don't like, like Morsi, Erdogan, Hamas, constantly).

Some of the more insane madkhalis even believe it is impermissible to criticize non-Muslim rulers!

Furthermore, they elevate this position to a matter of aqidah, such that if you disagree, that makes you a khariji outside ahl al-sunna and a potential terrorist. They then say that, since you're a potential terrorist, it is permissible for authorities to surveil, imprison, or kill you.

You can see all the main madkhali accounts put this into practice by reporting Muslims they disagree with online to police, knowing that the authorities in some countries kill any alleged dissident.

Who would want to be associated with such a ridiculous, odious group? That's why in places without gulf money, you won't see them have much of an influence. And online, they're 90% paid bots. It's pathetic.



 
@Omar del Sur no one takes madkhalis seriously anymore. And no one speaks of Salafis, but madkhalis. You know exactly how they support/protecting liberalism, by supporting gulf leaders who support liberalism and secularism.

"Madkhalis" are crypto-liberals.... this is the dumbest conspiracy theory.

Also, all the real Salafis are in line with "Madkhalism". "Madkhali" is just a Salafi who opposes the ikhwani type ideology of people like Haqiqatjou.

Really it is not leadership it is only MBS/MBZ/Sisi they protect, any leader that opposes them they think is good to attack and topple. Basically, they only support Zionist aligned leaders who advance liberalism/secularism and fight Muslims.

this is just a hoax. "Madkhalis" (who are actually just Salafis) avoid talking about the rulers in general.
 
I also want to mention.... this whole narrative that "Madkhalis" (actually Salafis).... because they don't go around publically ranting against the governments of Muslim countries.....

that this means they support this or that government.

that whole premise is completely fake. I don't go and talk about the government of Indonesia. so I'm a stooge for that government?

not discussing a government does not equal being a supporter or stooge of that government. that is a completely ridiculous principle.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top