KinsiHilaac
Pretend there is a title here
i don't agree with this. Ok, so you said "atheism is the lack of belief in God". we can rephrase this and it becomes "atheism is the belief in the claim that God does't exist". Now, to be an atheist you are making a claim, and every claim requires a proof. Therefore to be an atheist you must provide proof for your claim ( God not existing).
For me to type to you, I would need a phone, which depends on the resources mined to manufacture that phone, which depends on the formation of the earth to produce those resources, and so on till you reach the universe. We are all aware that the universe was created. At the end is god because what is after the universe?. An infinite list of dependencies is not an option because that would lead to the infinite regression fallacy. Thus, there must be a self-sufficient maker. But how would we recognise this autonomous being as Allah? This only makes up half of the justification for Islam.
find me a hole in this logic
Your argument makes sense but the possibility of something existing. In the manner that you explained above. Doesn’t necessarily mean that it does exist.
It does not logically follow that a fact exists simply because it may possibly exist--logically,
it just as possibly may not exist.